Literature DB >> 35119555

Study of the significance of parameters and their interaction on assessing femoral fracture risk by quantitative statistical analysis.

Rabina Awal1, Jalel Ben Hmida1, Yunhua Luo2, Tanvir Faisal3.   

Abstract

Early assessment of hip fracture helps develop therapeutic and preventive mechanisms that may reduce the occurrence of hip fracture. An accurate assessment of hip fracture risk requires proper consideration of the loads, the physiological and morphological parameters, and the interactions between these parameters. Hence, this study aims at analyzing the significance of parameters and their interactions by conducting a quantitative statistical analysis. A multiple regression model was developed considering different loading directions during a sideways fall (angle [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] on the coronal and transverse planes, respectively), age, gender, patient weight, height, and femur morphology as independent parameters and Fracture Risk Index (FRI) as a dependent parameter. Strain-based criteria were used for the calculation of FRI with the maximum principal strain obtained from quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis. The statistical result shows that [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text], age [Formula: see text], true moment length [Formula: see text], gender [Formula: see text], FNA [Formula: see text], height [Formula: see text], and FSL [Formula: see text] significantly affect FRI where [Formula: see text] is the most influential parameter. The significance of two-level interaction [Formula: see text] and three-level interaction [Formula: see text] shows that the effect of parameters is dissimilar and depends on other parameters suggesting the variability of FRI from person to person.
© 2022. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Hip fracture; Multiple regression analysis; Parametric quantitative analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35119555     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02516-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  43 in total

1.  Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  L Duchemin; V Bousson; C Raossanaly; C Bergot; J D Laredo; W Skalli; D Mitton
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry.

Authors:  F A Mourtada; T J Beck; D L Hauser; C B Ruff; G Bao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Assessment of finite element models for prediction of osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  Yeokyeong Lee; Naomichi Ogihara; Taeyong Lee
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-05-11

4.  Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).

Authors:  A Tenenhouse; L Joseph; N Kreiger; S Poliquin; T M Murray; L Blondeau; C Berger; D A Hanley; J C Prior
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  T J Beck; T L Oreskovic; K L Stone; C B Ruff; K Ensrud; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Cross-sectional assessment of age-related bone loss in men: the MINOS study.

Authors:  P Szulc; F Marchand; F Duboeuf; P D Delmas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Contribution of hip strength indices to hip fracture risk in elderly men and women.

Authors:  Henrik G Ahlborg; Nguyen D Nguyen; Tuan V Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures.

Authors:  Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Pierre Delmas; John A Eisman; Seiko Fujiwara; Heikki Kroger; Dan Mellstrom; Pierre J Meunier; L Joseph Melton; Terry O'Neill; Huibert Pols; Jonathan Reeve; Alan Silman; Alan Tenenhouse
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; K E Warden; W W Scott; G U Rao
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Artificial Intelligence Applied to Osteoporosis: A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Fragility Fractures From MRI Data.

Authors:  Uran Ferizi; Harrison Besser; Pirro Hysi; Joseph Jacobs; Chamith S Rajapakse; Cheng Chen; Punam K Saha; Stephen Honig; Gregory Chang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.