Literature DB >> 35119492

Risk of penetration of the baseplate peg in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for an Asian population.

Eiji Tashiro1, Naohide Takeuchi2, Naoya Kozono1, Akira Nabeshima1, Ei Teshima3, Yasuharu Nakashima1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Baseplate positioning may affect clinical outcome after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of penetration of the baseplate peg in RTSA.
METHODS: Forty-four patients with rotator cuff arthropathy or massive rotator cuff tears were included. Using their computed tomography data, ten insertion patterns of the baseplate pegs were simulated. First, in the axial plane, the baseplate was placed perpendicular to the Friedman axis (Friedman placement) and parallel to the glenoid surface (glenoid placement). Second, each of these placements were classified into the following groups: The baseplate peg was placed 2 mm anterior to the long axis of the glenoid (group A2), 1 mm anterior (group A1), on the long axis (group C0), 1 mm posterior (group P1), and 2 mm posterior (group P2). Cases in which the baseplate peg was within the scapular neck were defined as non-penetration, and the non-penetration rates among each group were evaluated and compared between sexes, and their relationship with patient height was evaluated.
RESULTS: In both the Friedman and glenoid placements, the non-penetration rate was significantly higher in groups A2 (68.2% and 70.5%) and A1 (65.9% and 65.9%) compared with groups P1 (18.2% and 29.5%) and P2 (9.1% and 13.6%; p < 0.001) and in males than in females (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the non-penetration rate tended to be higher as the patient's height increased.
CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the baseplate peg be placed anterior to the long axis of the glenoid.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baseplate; Massive rotator cuff tears; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; Rotator cuff arthropathy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35119492     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05328-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  34 in total

1.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current concepts, results, and component wear analysis.

Authors:  D Nam; C K Kepler; A S Neviaser; K J Jones; T M Wright; E V Craig; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a mini 25-mm glenoid baseplate.

Authors:  George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Deficiency: A Concise Follow-up, at a Minimum of 10 Years, of Previous Reports.

Authors:  Derek J Cuff; Derek R Pupello; Brandon G Santoni; Rachel E Clark; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Long-Term Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Follow-up of a Previous Study.

Authors:  Guillaume Bacle; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Pascal Garaud; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Nuno Sevivas; Nuno Ferreira; Renato Andrade; Pedro Moreira; Raquel Portugal; Diogo Alves; Manuel Vieira da Silva; Nuno Sousa; António J Salgado; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Mid-term outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the alternative center line for glenoid baseplate fixation: a case-controlled study.

Authors:  Ryan Colley; Teja S Polisetty; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  Does preoperative diagnosis impact patient outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Atticus C Coscia; Robert N Matar; Emil E Espinal; Nihar S Shah; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Radiographic changes around the glenoid component in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; María Galán-Olleros; Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Carlos García-Fernández; Fernando Marco
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty clinical and patient-reported outcomes and complications stratified by preoperative diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  June Kennedy; Christopher S Klifto; Leila Ledbetter; Garrett S Bullock
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  The influence of glenoid component position on scapular notching: a detailed radiographic analysis at midterm follow-up.

Authors:  Nicholas C Duethman; William R Aibinder; Ngoc Tram V Nguyen; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.