Literature DB >> 29135662

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Deficiency: A Concise Follow-up, at a Minimum of 10 Years, of Previous Reports.

Derek J Cuff1, Derek R Pupello, Brandon G Santoni, Rachel E Clark, Mark A Frankle.   

Abstract

We previously evaluated 94 patients (96 shoulders) who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a central compressive screw with 5.0-mm peripheral locking screws for baseplate fixation and a center of rotation lateral to the glenoid as treatment for end-stage rotator cuff deficiency. The purpose of this study was to report updated results at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Forty patients (42 shoulders) were available for clinical follow-up. In the patients available for study, implant survivorship, with the end point being revision for any reason, was 90.7%. Since our 5-year report, 2 patients underwent revision surgery; 1 patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture 7 years postoperatively and 1 patient had a dislocation because of chronic shoulder instability at 8 years postoperatively. At a minimum follow-up of 10 years, the patients continued to maintain their improved outcome scores and range of motion, which were comparable with earlier follow-up evaluations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29135662     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  25 in total

1.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CORR Insights®: Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 5.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

Review 6.  Massive Rotator Cuff Tear: When to Consider Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas R Sellers; Adham Abdelfattah; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

7.  CORR Insights®: Improved Clinical Outcomes After Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Winston J Warme
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cost-effectiveness of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Does indication affect outcome?

Authors:  Jamie A Nicholson; Rhiannon Jones; Deborah J MacDonald; Iain Brown; Julie McBirnie
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-01-23

9.  [Research progress of treatment for massive rotator cuff tears].

Authors:  Xiaolong Zheng; Kanglai Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

10.  Humeral-sided Radiographic Changes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler J Brolin; Ryan M Cox; John G Horneff Iii; Surena Namdari; Joseph A Abboud; Kristen Nicholson; Matthew L Ramsey
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.