| Literature DB >> 35118831 |
Kazumi Yoshizawa1, Saki Ukai1, Junpei Kuroda1, Tsugumi Yamauchi2, Daisuke Yamada2, Akiyoshi Saitoh2, Satoshi Iriyama3, Shoichi Nishino4, Satoru Miyazaki5.
Abstract
Stress has been shown to affect brain activity and exert potent and complex modulatory effects on pain. Several behavioral tests have shown that acute stress produces hyperalgesia, depending on the stress conditions. In the present study, we investigated the effects of single restraint stress on the tactile threshold and anxiety sensitivity in mice. Mice were evaluated for the tactile threshold using von Frey filaments and for anxiety sensitivity using the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. Tactile thresholds were lowered by both 2 and 4 hour of restraint stress, but anxiety-like behaviors were observed only after 4 hour of restraint stress in the EPM test. In addition, we found that alfaxalone, which is a positive allosteric modulator of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor, prevented restraint stress-induced hyperalgesia-like and anxiety-like behaviors. These results indicate that GABAergic function appears to be critical in the regulation of physical stress-induced hyperalgesia and anxiety.Entities:
Keywords: allopregnanolone; anxiety; hyperalgesia; physical stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35118831 PMCID: PMC9216362 DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychopharmacol Rep ISSN: 2574-173X
FIGURE 1Showing the experimental timeline A. Mice were evaluated for the tactile threshold using von Frey filaments B, and for anxiety sensitivity using the EPM test C, after 2 or 4 h of restraint stress. Each point or column represents the mean ± SEM of six mice per group. *P < .05 and **P < .01 versus the control group. Raw data of Figure 1B and 1C are shown in Tables S1‐S2
FIGURE 2Showing the experimental timeline A. Effects of alfaxalone on the tactile threshold evaluated using von Frey filaments B, and on anxiety sensitivity evaluated using the EPM test C, in stressed mice. Each point or column represents the mean ± SEM of six mice per group. *P < .05 and ***P < .005 versus the restraint alone group. Raw data of Figure 2B and 2C are shown in Tables S1‐S2