Purpose: Deep learning has shown promise for predicting the molecular profiles of gliomas using MR images. Prior to clinical implementation, ensuring robustness to real-world problems, such as patient motion, is crucial. The purpose of this study is to perform a preliminary evaluation on the effects of simulated motion artifact on glioma marker classifier performance and determine if motion correction can restore classification accuracies. Approach: T2w images and molecular information were retrieved from the TCIA and TCGA databases. Simulated motion was added in the k-space domain along the phase encoding direction. Classifier performance for IDH mutation, 1p/19q co-deletion, and MGMT methylation was assessed over the range of 0% to 100% corrupted k-space lines. Rudimentary motion correction networks were trained on the motion-corrupted images. The performance of the three glioma marker classifiers was then evaluated on the motion-corrected images. Results: Glioma marker classifier performance decreased markedly with increasing motion corruption. Applying motion correction effectively restored classification accuracy for even the most motion-corrupted images. For isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) classification, 99% accuracy was achieved, exceeding the original performance of the network and representing a new benchmark in non-invasive MRI-based IDH classification. Conclusions: Robust motion correction can facilitate highly accurate deep learning MRI-based molecular marker classification, rivaling invasive tissue-based characterization methods. Motion correction may be able to increase classification accuracy even in the absence of a visible artifact, representing a new strategy for boosting classifier performance.
Purpose: Deep learning has shown promise for predicting the molecular profiles of gliomas using MR images. Prior to clinical implementation, ensuring robustness to real-world problems, such as patient motion, is crucial. The purpose of this study is to perform a preliminary evaluation on the effects of simulated motion artifact on glioma marker classifier performance and determine if motion correction can restore classification accuracies. Approach: T2w images and molecular information were retrieved from the TCIA and TCGA databases. Simulated motion was added in the k-space domain along the phase encoding direction. Classifier performance for IDH mutation, 1p/19q co-deletion, and MGMT methylation was assessed over the range of 0% to 100% corrupted k-space lines. Rudimentary motion correction networks were trained on the motion-corrupted images. The performance of the three glioma marker classifiers was then evaluated on the motion-corrected images. Results: Glioma marker classifier performance decreased markedly with increasing motion corruption. Applying motion correction effectively restored classification accuracy for even the most motion-corrupted images. For isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) classification, 99% accuracy was achieved, exceeding the original performance of the network and representing a new benchmark in non-invasive MRI-based IDH classification. Conclusions: Robust motion correction can facilitate highly accurate deep learning MRI-based molecular marker classification, rivaling invasive tissue-based characterization methods. Motion correction may be able to increase classification accuracy even in the absence of a visible artifact, representing a new strategy for boosting classifier performance.
Authors: Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Gang Song; Philip A Cook; Arno Klein; James C Gee Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Chandan Ganesh Bangalore Yogananda; Bhavya R Shah; Frank F Yu; Marco C Pinho; Sahil S Nalawade; Gowtham K Murugesan; Benjamin C Wagner; Bruce Mickey; Toral R Patel; Baowei Fei; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Joseph A Maldjian Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2020-07-17
Authors: Sahil Nalawade; Gowtham K Murugesan; Maryam Vejdani-Jahromi; Ryan A Fisicaro; Chandan G Bangalore Yogananda; Ben Wagner; Bruce Mickey; Elizabeth Maher; Marco C Pinho; Baowei Fei; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Joseph A Maldjian Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-12-10
Authors: C G B Yogananda; B R Shah; S S Nalawade; G K Murugesan; F F Yu; M C Pinho; B C Wagner; B Mickey; T R Patel; B Fei; A J Madhuranthakam; J A Maldjian Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 3.825