Literature DB >> 35118164

Brain tumor IDH, 1p/19q, and MGMT molecular classification using MRI-based deep learning: an initial study on the effect of motion and motion correction.

Sahil S Nalawade1, Fang F Yu1, Chandan Ganesh Bangalore Yogananda1, Gowtham K Murugesan1, Bhavya R Shah1, Marco C Pinho1, Benjamin C Wagner1, Yin Xi1, Bruce Mickey2, Toral R Patel2, Baowei Fei3, Ananth J Madhuranthakam1, Joseph A Maldjian1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Deep learning has shown promise for predicting the molecular profiles of gliomas using MR images. Prior to clinical implementation, ensuring robustness to real-world problems, such as patient motion, is crucial. The purpose of this study is to perform a preliminary evaluation on the effects of simulated motion artifact on glioma marker classifier performance and determine if motion correction can restore classification accuracies. Approach: T2w images and molecular information were retrieved from the TCIA and TCGA databases. Simulated motion was added in the k-space domain along the phase encoding direction. Classifier performance for IDH mutation, 1p/19q co-deletion, and MGMT methylation was assessed over the range of 0% to 100% corrupted k-space lines. Rudimentary motion correction networks were trained on the motion-corrupted images. The performance of the three glioma marker classifiers was then evaluated on the motion-corrected images.
Results: Glioma marker classifier performance decreased markedly with increasing motion corruption. Applying motion correction effectively restored classification accuracy for even the most motion-corrupted images. For isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) classification, 99% accuracy was achieved, exceeding the original performance of the network and representing a new benchmark in non-invasive MRI-based IDH classification. Conclusions: Robust motion correction can facilitate highly accurate deep learning MRI-based molecular marker classification, rivaling invasive tissue-based characterization methods. Motion correction may be able to increase classification accuracy even in the absence of a visible artifact, representing a new strategy for boosting classifier performance.
© 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep learning; isocitrate dehydrogenase; magnetic resonance imaging; motion artifact simulation; motion correction

Year:  2022        PMID: 35118164      PMCID: PMC8794036          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.1.016001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  23 in total

Review 1.  An introduction to the Fourier transform: relationship to MRI.

Authors:  Thomas A Gallagher; Alexander J Nemeth; Lotfi Hacein-Bey
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutions.

Authors:  Maxim Zaitsev; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  CSF pulsations within nonneoplastic spinal cord cysts.

Authors:  D R Enzmann; J O'Donohue; J B Rubin; L Shuer; P Cogen; G Silverberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Correction of Motion Artifacts Using a Multiscale Fully Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  K Sommer; A Saalbach; T Brosch; C Hall; N M Cross; J B Andre
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Gang Song; Philip A Cook; Arno Klein; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A novel fully automated MRI-based deep-learning method for classification of 1p/19q co-deletion status in brain gliomas.

Authors:  Chandan Ganesh Bangalore Yogananda; Bhavya R Shah; Frank F Yu; Marco C Pinho; Sahil S Nalawade; Gowtham K Murugesan; Benjamin C Wagner; Bruce Mickey; Toral R Patel; Baowei Fei; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Joseph A Maldjian
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-07-17

8.  Radiomics Strategy for Molecular Subtype Stratification of Lower-Grade Glioma: Detecting IDH and TP53 Mutations Based on Multimodal MRI.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Qiang Tian; Liang Wang; Yang Liu; Baojuan Li; Zhengrong Liang; Peng Gao; Kaizhong Zheng; Bofeng Zhao; Hongbing Lu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Classification of brain tumor isocitrate dehydrogenase status using MRI and deep learning.

Authors:  Sahil Nalawade; Gowtham K Murugesan; Maryam Vejdani-Jahromi; Ryan A Fisicaro; Chandan G Bangalore Yogananda; Ben Wagner; Bruce Mickey; Elizabeth Maher; Marco C Pinho; Baowei Fei; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Joseph A Maldjian
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-12-10

10.  MRI-Based Deep-Learning Method for Determining Glioma MGMT Promoter Methylation Status.

Authors:  C G B Yogananda; B R Shah; S S Nalawade; G K Murugesan; F F Yu; M C Pinho; B C Wagner; B Mickey; T R Patel; B Fei; A J Madhuranthakam; J A Maldjian
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.