Literature DB >> 35116822

Prostate health index is useful for prostate cancer detecting in Chinese people.

Yuhua Huang1, Xiaolei Gu1, Yu Wang1, Jianquan Hou1, Xiaofei Qi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence was increased substantially in the last two decades in China. We evaluated the performance of prostate health index (PHI) in predicting the presence of PCa in Chinese people.
METHODS: A total of 108 consecutive patients were recruited to develop a PHI-based nomogram to predict PCa. Serum total prostate specific antigen (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), and p2PSA were measured by Beckman Coulter's DxI 800 Immunoassay System. PHI was calculated by [p2PSA/fPSA]×. Performance of individual PSA and PHI measurements in discriminating clinical outcomes was measured using the detection rate of PCa, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: Among all patients, PHI was a better predictor of PCa compared with tPSA. PHI achieved the highest AUC of 76.6% in discriminating PCa from non-PCa compare to tPSA measurement, the difference of AUC area between PHI and PSA was about 6% in the entire cohort. The PHI-based nomogram reduced the number of biopsies. With the cutoff value (tPSA >4 ng/mL, PHI >40), there were 37 patients need to do biopsies in tPSA >4 ng/mL group, while with PHI >40, only 30 patients need to do. Seven patients could avoid unnecessary biopsies. When combined with the two values (tPSA >4 ng/mL, PHI >40) only 24 patients remained.
CONCLUSIONS: Our finding has implication PHI and provides added value over tPSA for PCa detecting in Chinese people. 2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate health index (PHI); prostate cancer (PCa); prostate specific antigen (PSA)

Year:  2019        PMID: 35116822      PMCID: PMC8798185          DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2019.05.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence was increased substantially in the last two decades in China (1,2). Different from Western countries, more high-grade PCa (Gleason score 7 or more) were detected at the first time of diagnosis in Chinese. And un-similar with Western countries, total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) were higher than 10 ng/mL in most of those people (1,3-5). For PCa detecting, total PSA was still an excellent biomarker now days, however tPSA was not PCa specific, other non-cancer conditions such as enlarged prostate and inflammation in the prostate may also lead to elevated PSA levels, so its specificity was relatively low, meanings a high prevalence of unnecessary biopsies (6-8). To preserve the benefit of early detection while reducing over-diagnose, new biomarkers would be welcome to increase the specificity of the PSA test (1,5-8). [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), a truncated PSA isoform, was demonstrated better accuracy than serum tPSA and fPSA in detecting PCa. The prostate health index (PHI), derived from a combination of p2PSA, tPSA, and fPSA (free PSA) had been shown to be better predictor of PCa (9-14), had been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). There were many papers reported the PHI is a better predictor of PCa in patients from Europe and American (1,6,10,12-14), but few papers in Chinese people. In this paper, we would using an observational prospective study design to test whether PHI could aid in clinical practice.

Methods

Patients and tissue samples

A total of 108 consecutive patients which visited doctors between 2014 and 2016 in No. 1 affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were included in this study. After written informed consent, PHI and PSA was detected for each patient before any study-specific investigation was performed. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy was performed using a 12-core scheme. All biopsy specimens were reviewed by two doctors at the Pathology Department. This study was approved by the ethic committees at local hospitals.

Laboratory methods

Beckman Coulter’s DxI800 Immunoassay System was using to detecting Serum p2PSA, tPSA and fPSA of each patient. PHI was calculated by ([p2PSA/fPSA]×. Performance of individual PSA and PHI measurements in discriminating clinical outcomes was measured using the detection rate of PCa, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (1,6).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package of the Social Sciences software version 19.0 (SPSS, Inc.). A two-sided P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

A total 108 patients were recruited in this research. Baseline characteristic of all patients were shown in . Most of the patients were aged between 60 and 70 years, mean of all patients age was 69.4 [47-87] years.
Table 1

Characteristics of study objects

CharacteristicsOverall, n=108Absence of PCa, n=57 (52.8%)Presence of PCa, n=51 (47.2%)P value
Age, yr69.4±6.8 [47–87]68.9±7.469.9±6.2>0.05
tPSA, ng/mL20.6±4.24 (2.23–149)10.3±8.430.3±38.4<0.05
fPSA, ng/mL2.88±4.2 (0.03–20)1.9±1.63.8±5.6>0.05
PHI142.8±340.8 (6.85–2,986.2)46.5±17.5233.2±458.2<0.05

PCa, prostate cancer; tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; fPSA, free prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index.

PCa, prostate cancer; tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; fPSA, free prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index. Among all people, 51 patients were diagnosed with PCa, 57 patients were absence of PCa, mean of age in PCa group is 69.9, while in absence of group it is 68.9. fPSA was 3.8 vs. 1.9 ng/mL. No different with age and fPSA. PHI and tPSA were higher in PCa group, in the group of absence of PCa, mean of tPSA was 10.3 ng/mL, in PCa group was 30.3 ng/mL (P<0.05). Similar as tPSA, PHI was higher in PCa group, in PCa group, mean of PHI was 233.2 ng/mL, while in absence of PCa, there was 46.5 ng/mL only (P<0.05). To get the more effect marker in predicted PCa, the PHI, PHI + tPSA and tPSA were selected. When we choose 60% sensitivity, the specificity for PSA to detect PCa was 68%, while the PHI and tPSA + PHI was 86%, 87.7% respect. When sensitivity was 70%, the specificity of PSA was 56.1%, PHI and tPSA + PHI were decrease to 75.4% and 77.2%. With 80% sensitivity, the specificity of PSA was 38.6%, PHI and PHI + PSA were 45.6% (). All that means the specificity of PHI or PHI + PSA were higher than PSA.
Table 2

Performance of tPSA and PHI measurements in predicting prostate cancer

Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
60
   tPSA68.0 (54.8–80.1)
   PHI86.0 (74.2–93.7)
   tPSA + PHI87.7 (76.3–94.9)
70
   tPSA56.1 (42.4–69.3)
   PHI75.4 (62.2–85.9)
   tPSA + PHI77.2 (64.2–87.3)
80
   tPSA38.6 (26–52.4)
   PHI45.6 (32.4–93.7)
   tPSA + PHI45.6 (32.4–93.7)

tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; fPSA, free prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index.

tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; fPSA, free prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index. Compared with tPSA measurement, AUC was always higher for PHI. In detecting PCa, AUC of PHI was 76.6%, tPSA + PHI was 76.7%, while tPSA was only 70.8% (compare with 50%, P<0.05), the difference of AUC between PHI and PSA was about 6% in the entire cohort ().
Figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses of predictor for prostate cancer. tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; fPSA, free prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index.

Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses of predictor for prostate cancer. tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; fPSA, free prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index. We also evaluated the benefit of PHI over tPSA in reducing the number of biopsies. As show, in 57 PCa negative patients, there were 37 patients need to do biopsies with the cutoff value of tPSA >4 ng/mL; while with the value of PHI >40, only 30 patients need do. Seven patients could avoid unnecessary biopsies. When combined with the two values (tPSA >4 ng/mL, PHI >40) only 24 patients remained (P<0.05).
Table 3

The benefit of PHI over tPSA in reducing the number of biopsies

tPSA (ng/mL)PHI
≤40>40
≤4146
>41324

tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index.

tPSA, total prostate specific antigen; PHI, prostate health index.

Discussion

Although reasons were unclear, the PCa incidence and its trend were differences in Western countries and China. The incidence in China was lower than Western counties. More PCa patients in first diagnosed were high-grade PCa in China compared with Western country. Furthermore, the gray zone is different in Chinese patients from Western country (2,6,15). So some useful marker in detecting PCa in Western country need to validated in Chinese people, such as PHI. Derived from a combination of p2PSA, tPSA, and fPSA, PHI had been shown to be a better predictor of PCa in Western country. Similar as the results of Western country, we find that PHI performed better than tPSA in PCa detecting. The specificity of PHI and PHI + tPSA is higher than tPSA. The PHI achieved an AUC 76.7% while tPSA was 70.8%. All those date meanings that PHI-based strategy can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies while maintaining the same detection rate of PCa. Although additional muti-center with larger sample size need, our results identified the PHI can be used as a new reference standard for PCa detecting in China.
  15 in total

1.  PSA and prostate cancer screening: the challenge of the new millennium.

Authors:  Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Flip H Jansen; Ron H N van Schaik; Joep Kurstjens; Wolfgang Horninger; Helmut Klocker; Jasmin Bektic; Mark F Wildhagen; Monique J Roobol; Chris H Bangma; Georg Bartsch
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Predicting prostate biopsy outcome: prostate health index (phi) and prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) are useful biomarkers.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Dario Bruzzese; Sisto Perdonà; Claudia Mazzarella; Ada Marino; Alessandra Sorrentino; Angelina Di Carlo; Riccardo Autorino; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Carlo Buonerba; Vincenzo Altieri; Angela Mariano; Vincenzo Macchia; Daniela Terracciano
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.786

4.  Performance of serum prostate-specific antigen isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and the prostate health index (PHI) in a Chinese hospital-based biopsy population.

Authors:  Rong Na; Dingwei Ye; Fang Liu; Haitao Chen; Jun Qi; Yishuo Wu; Guiming Zhang; Meilin Wang; Wenying Wang; Jielin Sun; Guopeng Yu; Yao Zhu; Shancheng Ren; S Lilly Zheng; Haowen Jiang; Yinghao Sun; Qiang Ding; Jianfeng Xu
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Clinical utility of %p2PSA and prostate health index in the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Laura Foj; Josep Maria Augé; Rafael Molina; Joan Alcover
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Donna P Ankerst; Andreas Boeck; Stephen J Freedland; Ian M Thompson; Angel M Cronin; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; J Stephen Jones; Michael W Kattan; Eric A Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Daniel M Moreira; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The burden of prostate cancer in Asian nations.

Authors:  Jennifer Cullen; Sally Elsamanoudi; Stephen A Brassell; Yongmei Chen; Monica Colombo; Amita Srivastava; David G McLeod
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2012-03-19

Review 8.  Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis: From Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) to Exosomal Biomarkers.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Laura Foj
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Outcomes and trends of prostate biopsy for prostate cancer in Chinese men from 2003 to 2011.

Authors:  Rong Na; Haowen Jiang; Seong-Tae Kim; Yishuo Wu; Shijun Tong; Limin Zhang; Jianfeng Xu; Yinghao Sun; Qiang Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Prostate cancer in East Asia: evolving trend over the last decade.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Hong-Kai Wang; Yuan-Yuan Qu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of alternative splicing profiling reveals novel events associated with prognosis and the infiltration of immune cells in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tianqi Wu; Wenfeng Wang; Yanhao Wang; Mengfei Yao; Leilei Du; Xingming Zhang; Yongqiang Huang; Jianhua Wang; Hongbo Yu; Xiaojie Bian
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.