Literature DB >> 3511648

Systematic correlation of continuous-wave Doppler and hemodynamic measurements in patients with aortic stenosis.

M D Smith, P L Dawson, J L Elion, T Wisenbaugh, O L Kwan, S Handshoe, A N DeMaria.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare estimates of pressure gradients obtained from continuous-wave (CW) Doppler recordings with direct pressure measurements derived from cardiac catheterization in patients with aortic stenosis. Forty patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for evaluation of aortic stenosis were prospectively studied with CW Doppler spectral recordings of the aortic valve prior to catheterization. Thirty-three patients underwent a second Doppler examination simultaneously with pressure recordings in the catheterization laboratory. Nineteen of the patients had catheterization pressures measured using high-fidelity, micromanometer-tip catheters. Doppler and pressure tracings were digitized using a microprocessor-based computer with a software program which allowed for calculation of maximal instantaneous, mean, and peak-to-peak gradients, plus ejection and acceleration times. Maximal instantaneous gradient by CW Doppler showed an excellent correlation with maximal instantaneous catheterization gradient (r = 0.93, SEE = 9 mm Hg). The correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler gradient with peak-to-peak catheterization gradient was also linear (r = 0.85, SEE = 12 mm Hg), but there was a consistent overestimation of peak-to-peak gradient in 38 of 40 cases (mean = 17 mm Hg). Mean gradient as calculated by the two techniques correlated best of all measurements performed (r = 0.95, SEE = 6 mm Hg). When patients were grouped into subsets of mild (0 to 25 mm Hg), moderate (25 to 50 mm Hg), and severe (greater than 50 mm Hg) levels of stenosis, the correlation of maximal instantaneous Doppler and peak-to-peak catheterization gradients were r = 0.22, 0.44, and 0.77, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3511648     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90135-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  The quest for the unholy grail.

Authors:  T Kimball
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Assessment of cardiac hemodynamics and valvular function by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; J Dubin; R B Devereux
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-10

3.  Influence of stenotic valve geometry on measured pressure gradients and ventricular work: the relationship between morphology and flow.

Authors:  E G Cape; D L Kelly; J A Ettedgui; S C Park
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  [Percutaneous transfemoral valvuloplasty in patients with calcified aortic stenosis and significantly increased surgical risk: clinical course and value of Doppler sonography in assessment of therapeutic success].

Authors:  H Kücherer; H Katus; R Dietz; B Rauch; W Kübler
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1988-07-01

5.  Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children.

Authors:  Antonios P Vlahos; Gerald R Marx; Doff McElhinney; Stephen Oneill; Ioannis Goudevenos; Steven D Colan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Doppler estimation of pressure gradient in pulmonary stenosis: maximal instantaneous vs peak-to-peak, vs mean catheter gradient.

Authors:  A W Aldousany; T G DiSessa; R Dubois; B S Alpert; E S Willey; S E Birnbaum
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.