| Literature DB >> 35115933 |
Xiao-Bao Liu1,2, Lu-Shi Tang1,3, Jing-Wen Chen1,2, Chang-Song Lin1,2, Qiu-Hong Liu1,3, Qiang Xu1,2.
Abstract
Background: Uveitis refers to inflammation in the uvea, retina, retinal blood vessels, and vitreous, which can lead to irreversible eye damage and permanent vision loss. Glucocorticoid drugs are the first-line treatment, but side effects, such as obesity and hyperglycemia, can occur. Therefore, biologics have become a new treatment choice. Case Presentation: A 18-year-old girl developed eye pain and was diagnosed with binocular uveitis. Prednisone 50 mg was administered once a day, and the redness and pain in both eyes improved. Later, the prednisone dose was gradually reduced, and treatment was discontinued 3 years ago. Two years ago, the patient's condition relapsed, with both eyes becoming red and painful. She was administered prednisone 20 mg once daily and adalimumab. Visual acuity in both eyes continued to progressively decrease, accompanied by cataracts. At the same time, the patient experienced complications, including obesity and hyperglycemia. Subsequently, a new treatment regimen, oral prednisone 20 mg once a day, tofacitinib 5 mg twice a day, and methotrexate 10 mg once a week, as well as the use of insulin to control blood sugar, was initiated. One month later, the patient's redness and eye pain eased, and her vision gradually improved. The dosage of prednisone was gradually reduced to 5 mg once daily. At the same time, her blood sugar returned to normal, and insulin was stopped. Outcomes: The patient was treated with tofacitinib for 10 months. Subsequently, her best-corrected visual acuity of the right eye rose from 0.06 to 0.075, and the best-corrected visual acuity of the left eye rose from CF/30 cm to CF/100 cm. Redness and eye pain were relieved, her glucocorticoid consumption reduced from 15 to 2.5 mg, and her blood sugar gradually normalized.Entities:
Keywords: JAK inhibitor; case report; glucocorticoid drugs; noninfectious uveitis; tofacitinib
Year: 2022 PMID: 35115933 PMCID: PMC8804343 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.784860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Treatment progress.
FIGURE 2(A–E): Eye examination at each stage. (A-1) Shows the right eye before treatment, showing mild mixed conjunctival hyperemia, anterior chamber empyema, posterior corneal deposits (+), posterior iris adhesions, and mild lens opacity. (A-2) Shows the left eye before treatment, showing mild mixed conjunctival hyperemia, anterior chamber empyema, posterior corneal deposits (+), posterior iris adhesion and pupil closure. (B-1) Shows the right eye 1 month after the treatment. Conjunctival hyperemia, anterior chamber empyema, posterior corneal deposits (+), and posterior iris adhesions did not change significantly, and the degree of lens opacity was less than before. (B-2) Shows the left eye 1 month after treatment; there was no obvious change compared with the previous picture. (C-1) Shows the right eye 2 months after treatment; there was no significant change compared with the previous picture. (C-2) Shows the left eye 2 months after treatment, with mild mixed conjunctival hyperemia, anterior chamber empyema, posterior corneal deposits (+), posterior iris adhesions compared to before, no obvious changes, and fiber exudation in the pupil area. The film was absorbed and became lighter than before. (D-1) Shows the right eye, 3 months after treatment. The patient’s conjunctival hyperemia was worse than before, and the rest had no obvious changes. (D-2) Shows the left eye 3 months after treatment, the conjunctival hyperemia was worse than before, and the rest showed no obvious changes. (E-1) Shows the right eye, 10 months after treatment. Conjunctival mixed congestion is lessened, anterior chamber empyema, posterior corneal deposits, and the front image showed no obvious changes; the posterior iris adhesions were loosened compared with the front, the lens surface was pigmented, and the lens was slightly opaque. (E-2) Shows the left eye, 10 months after treatment. Conjunctival mixed conjunctival hyperemia was lessened, posterior iris adhesions were aggravated, and the rest had no obvious changes.
Best corrected vision and intraocular pressure of each stage.
| Time | Best corrected vision | Intraocular pressure (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | OD: 0.06 | OD: 8 |
| OS: CF/20 cm | OS: 7 | |
| 1 month later | OD: 0.06 | OD: 12 |
| OS: CF/30 cm | OS: 11 | |
| 2 months later | OD: 0.075 | OD: 12 |
| OS: CF/50 cm | OS: 12 | |
| 3 months later | OD: 0.075 | OD: 13 |
| OS: CF/50 cm | OS: 11 | |
| 10 months later | OD: 0.075 | OD: 12 |
| OS: CF/100 cm | OS: 10 |