| Literature DB >> 35115820 |
Suzhu Chen1, Pengyu Huang1, Yan Sun1, Shengrong Du1, Yunhong Lin1, Beihong Zheng1, Dianliang Lin1.
Abstract
This study set out to evaluate quality control within a new in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory environment and of new incubators based on the culture results of tripronuclear zygotes. The representative environmental indicators within new and old IVF laboratories were monitored, and tripronuclear zygotes were cultured in the two laboratories; the results were analyzed and compared. Subsequently, tripronuclear (3PN) zygotes were cultured in both new and old incubators and the culture results were compared. No differences were found in embryo development between 3PN zygotes in the old and new laboratories. However, in the quality control test, the degeneration rate and developmental arrest rate in the new incubator early phase group were significantly increased when compared with the old incubators. Moreover, the grade I embryo rate also decreased significantly. Nevertheless, all the above comparisons in the new incubator later phase group showed no statistical significance as compared to those observed in old incubators. Tripronuclear zygotes are sensitive to the environment in IVF laboratories and can be considered useful during quality control trials of new IVF laboratories and new equipment including incubators.Entities:
Keywords: degeneration rate; developmental arrest rate; embryo development; new incubator
Year: 2022 PMID: 35115820 PMCID: PMC8805836 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S345818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Environment Quality Test
| Index | Old Laboratory Group (n = 183) | New Laboratory Group (n = 185) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 24.09 ± 0.53 | 24.18 ± 0.89 | 0.240 |
| Humidity (%) | 50.11 ± 8.22 | 49.25 ± 7.40 | 0.292 |
| PM2.5 (pc/m3) | 0.77 ± 0.15 | 0.75 ± 0.19 | 0.263 |
| VOC Concentration (ppb) | 264.10 ± 53.60 | 267.20 ± 65.71 | 0.620 |
Abbreviations: n, measured days; VOC, volatile organic compounds; PM, fine particulate matter.
Figure 1The in vitro development of human tripronuclear (3PN) zygotes. (A and D) 3PN zygotes on Day 1. (B and E) 3PN zygotes continued to develop to the cleavage stage on Day 2. (C and F) 3PN zygotes continued to develop to the cleavage stage on Day 3.
Development Comparison of 3PN Zygotes in the New and Old Laboratories
| Index | Old Laboratory Group | New Laboratory Group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 164) | (n = 168) | ||
| Cleavage rate | 100% (164/164) | 99.4% (167/168) | 0.969 |
| Grade I embryo rate | 36.0% (59/164) | 40.5% (68/168) | 0.646 |
| Degradation rate | 11.6% (19/164) | 11.9% (20/168) | 0.929 |
| Development arrest rate | 3.0% (5/164) | 1.2 (2/168) | 0.440 |
Development of 3PN Zygotes in the New and Old Incubators
| Index | Old Incubator Group | New Incubator Early Phase Group | New Incubator Later Phase Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 168) | (n = 150) | (n = 152) | |
| Cleavage rate | 99.4% (167/168) | 96.7% (145/150) | 98.7% (150/152) |
| Grade I embryo rate | 40.5% (68/168) | 24.0% (36/150) a | 36.2% (55/152) |
| Degradation rate | 11.9% (20/168) | 23.3% (35/150) a | 10.5% (16/152) |
| Development arrest rate | 1.2% (2/168) | 6.7% (10/150) a | 3.9% (6/152) |
Note: aBy comparing with the old incubator groups.