Literature DB >> 17160731

Effect of micro-environment maintenance on embryo culture after in-vitro fertilization: comparison of top-load mini incubator and conventional front-load incubator.

Mutsuko Fujiwara1, Kentaro Takahashi, Mika Izuno, Ya Ru Duan, Maya Kazono, Fuminori Kimura, Yoichi Noda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of microenvironment maintenance on embryo culture and clinical results using two types of incubators.
METHODS: Temperature and oxygen concentration in a mini-incubator and a conventional incubator were compared following a 5-s door opening/closing procedure. Embryos of 30 in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cases were randomly allocated to either one of the incubator, cultured, and the early-stage good embryo formation rate and the good blastocyst formation rate were compared, as indicators for micro-environment maintenance ability.
RESULTS: Temperature recovery after a 5-s door opening/closing procedure was approximately 5 min for the mini-incubator and 30 min for the conventional incubator. The oxygen concentration return was significantly improved in the mini-incubator (3.0 +/- 0 min) compared with the conventional incubator (7.8 +/- 0.9 min). Both the early-stage good embryo formation rate and the good blastocyst formation rate were significantly higher in the mini-incubator (39.5% and 15.1%) than the conventional incubator (28.4% and 7.8%).
CONCLUSION: The microenvironment maintenance ability of incubators appears to significantly influence the formation of good embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17160731      PMCID: PMC3455086          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9088-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  5 in total

1.  Objective assessments of temperature maintenance using in vitro culture techniques.

Authors:  Simon Cooke; John P P Tyler; Geoff Driscoll
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Comparison of two media for sequential culture after IVF and ICSI shows no differences in pregnancy rates: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Klaus-Peter Zollner; Ursula Zollner; Minka Schneider; Johannes Dietl; Thomas Steck
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2004-01

3.  The efficacy of test tube warming devices used during oocyte retrieval for IVF.

Authors:  Queenie Sum Yee Yeung; Christine May Briton-Jones; Grace Ching Ching Tjer; Tony Tak Yu Chiu; Christopher Haines
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparison of G1.2/G2.2 and Sydney IVF cleavage/blastocyst sequential media for the culture of human embryos: a prospective, randomized, comparative study.

Authors:  A Van Langendonckt; D Demylle; C Wyns; M Nisolle; J Donnez
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: an analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst.

Authors:  V N Bolton; S M Hawes; C T Taylor; J H Parsons
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1989-02
  5 in total
  14 in total

1.  Temperature variations inside commercial IVF incubators.

Authors:  George Anifandis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Can we use incubators with atmospheric oxygen tension in the first phase of in vitro fertilization? A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Guarneri; Liliana Restelli; Alice Mangiarini; Stefania Ferrari; Edgardo Somigliana; Alessio Paffoni
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Considerations Regarding Embryo Culture Conditions: From Media to Epigenetics.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; George Anifandis; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Maria Lambropoulou; Athanasios Pappas; Efthimios Deligeoroglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Need for choosing the ideal pH value for IVF culture media.

Authors:  Nicolas Gatimel; Jessika Moreau; Jean Parinaud; Roger D Léandri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The role of co-culture systems on developmental competence of preimplantation mouse embryos against pH fluctuations.

Authors:  Seyed Noureddin Nematollahi-mahani; Amirmehdi Nematollahi-mahani; Ghazaleh Moshkdanian; Zhinoosossadat Shahidzadehyazdi; Fatemeh Labibi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The importance of the cleavage stage morphology evaluation for blastocyst transfer in patients with good prognosis.

Authors:  Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita C S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Temperature of embryo culture for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Nora A Baak; Astrid Ep Cantineau; Cindy Farquhar; Daniel R Brison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-17

8.  Offspring from mouse embryos developed using a simple incubator-free culture system with a deoxidizing agent.

Authors:  Fumiaki Itoi; Mikiko Tokoro; Yukari Terashita; Kazuo Yamagata; Noritaka Fukunaga; Yoshimasa Asada; Teruhiko Wakayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Laser confers less embryo exposure than acid tyrode for embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles: a randomized study.

Authors:  Selmo Geber; Renata Bossi; Cintia B Lisboa; Marcelo Valle; Marcos Sampaio
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  A Simple Method for Transportation of Mouse Embryos Using Microtubes and a Warm Box.

Authors:  Mikiko Tokoro; Noritaka Fukunaga; Kaori Yamanaka; Fumiaki Itoi; Yukari Terashita; Yuko Kamada; Sayaka Wakayama; Yoshimasa Asada; Teruhiko Wakayama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.