Literature DB >> 35115703

A systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct-current stimulation effects on cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Alireza Majdi1, Luuk van Boekholdt1, Saeed Sadigh-Eteghad2, Myles Mc Laughlin3.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) appears to enhance cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Accordingly, over the last two decades, the number of studies using tDCS for AD has grown. This study aimed to provide a quantitative assessment of the efficacy of tDCS in improving cognitive function in patients with AD. We systematically searched the literature until May 2021 to identify relevant publications for inclusion in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies were sham-controlled trials assessing the impacts of anodal or cathodal tDCS on cognitive function in patients with AD. The outcome measure of this study was the effects of tDCS on distinct cognitive domains including memory, attention, and global cognitive function. The initial search yielded a total of 323 records. Five other articles were found using manual search of the databases. Of these, 13 publications (14 different studies) with a total of 211 patients of various degrees of AD severity underwent meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed the non-significant effects of tDCS on attention (0.425 SMD, 95% CI, -0.254 to 1.104, p = 0.220), and significant positive impacts on the amelioration of general cognitive measures (1.640 SMD, 95% CI, 0.782 to 2.498, p < 0.000), and memory (1.031 SMD, 95% CI, 0.688 to 1.373, p < 0.000) dysfunction in patients with AD. However, the heterogeneity of the studies were high in all subdomains of cognition (ϰ2 = 22.810, T2 = 0.552, d.f. = 5, I2 = 78.80%, p < 0.000 for attention, ϰ2 = 96.29, T2 = 1.727, d.f. = 10, I2 = 89.61%, p < 0.000 for general cognition, and ϰ2 = 7.253, T2 = 0.085, d.f. = 5, I2 = 31.06%, p = 0.203 for memory). Improved memory and general cognitive function in patients with AD was shown in this meta-analysis. However, due to the small number of studies and the high heterogeneity of the data, more high-quality studies using standardized parameters and measures are needed before tDCS can be considered as a treatment for AD.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35115703     DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01444-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   13.437


  43 in total

1.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive and motor functions in the ageing brain? A systematic review and meta- analysis.

Authors:  Jeffery J Summers; Nyeonju Kang; James H Cauraugh
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 10.895

Review 3.  tDCS peripheral nerve stimulation: a neglected mode of action?

Authors:  Luuk van Boekholdt; Silke Kerstens; Ahmad Khatoun; Boateng Asamoah; Myles Mc Laughlin
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 4.  The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Martin Prince; Renata Bryce; Emiliano Albanese; Anders Wimo; Wagner Ribeiro; Cleusa P Ferri
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Prolonged visual memory enhancement after direct current stimulation in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Paulo Sergio Boggio; Roberta Ferrucci; Francesca Mameli; Débora Martins; Oscar Martins; Maurizio Vergari; Laura Tadini; Elio Scarpini; Felipe Fregni; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  R Ferrucci; F Mameli; I Guidi; S Mrakic-Sposta; M Vergari; S Marceglia; F Cogiamanian; S Barbieri; E Scarpini; A Priori
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  P S Boggio; L P Khoury; D C S Martins; O E M S Martins; E C de Macedo; F Fregni
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  At-Home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) With Telehealth Support for Symptom Control in Chronically-Ill Patients With Multiple Symptoms.

Authors:  Alexa Riggs; Vaishali Patel; Bhaskar Paneri; Russell K Portenoy; Marom Bikson; Helena Knotkova
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of online parietal transcranial electric stimulation on associative memory: a direct comparison between tDCS, theta tACS, and theta-oscillatory tDCS.

Authors:  Marko Živanović; Jovana Bjekić; Uroš Konstantinović; Saša R Filipović
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.