| Literature DB >> 35115562 |
Blazej Slazak1,2, Aleksandra Jędrzejska3, Bogna Badyra4, Anna Sybilska5, Mariusz Lewandowski5, Marcin Kozak6, Małgorzata Kapusta7, Reza Shariatgorji8, Anna Nilsson8, Per E Andrén8, Ulf Göransson9, Małgorzata Kiełkiewicz5.
Abstract
Plants employ different chemicals to protect themselves from herbivory. These defenses may be constitutive or triggered by stress. The chemicals can be toxic, act as repellents, phagosuppressants and/or phago-deterrents. The two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) is a generalist arthropod herbivorous pest and its feeding causes extensive damage both to crops and wild plants. Cyclotides are cyclic peptides involved in host-plant defenses. A single Viola sp. can produce more than a hundred cyclotides with different biological activities and roles. The organ and tissue specific cyclotide patterns change over the seasons and/or with environment, but the role of biotic/abiotic stress in shaping them remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate the involvement of cyclotides in mutual interactions between violets and mites. We used immunohistochemistry and mass spectrometry imaging to show the ingested cyclotides in T. urticae and assess the Viola odorata response to mite feeding. Moreover, to assess how mites are affected by feeding on violets, acceptance and reproductive performance was compared between Viola uliginosa, V. odorata and Phaseolus vulgaris. We demonstrate that cyclotides had been taken in by mites feeding on the violets. The ingested peptides were found in contact with epithelial cells of the mite digestive system, in the fecal matter, feces, ovary and eggs. Mites preferred common bean plants (P. vulgaris) to any of the violet species; the latter affected their reproductive performance. The production of particular cyclotides in V. odorata (denoted by molecular weights: 2979, 3001, 3017, 3068, 3084, 3123) was activated by mite feeding and their levels were significantly elevated compared to the control after 5 and 21 days of infestation. Specific cyclotides may affect mites by being indigestible or through direct interaction with cells in the mite digestive tract and reproductive organs. A group of particular peptides in V. odorata appears to be involved in defense response against herbivores.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35115562 PMCID: PMC8814195 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05461-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Immunolocalization of cyclotides in mite-damaged leaf tissues and in mites after ingestion. (a) Transverse sections of mite-infested leaves of V. uliginosa, and (b) V. odorata stained with immunohistochemistry. Cyclotides, found in the lower (le) and upper (ue) epidermis, palisade (pm) and spongy mesophyll (sm), are indicated in red; nuclei and chloroplasts are in blue. In the case of both Viola species, leaf injuries caused by mite feeding were localized in the palisade and spongy mesophyll (indicated with asterisks). (c) Simplified scheme of TSSM female anatomy. (d,e,f), Transections of different female mites fed on bean (control) (d1 and d2); and cyclotide-challenged females fed on V. odorata (e,e1,e2,f1,f2). Different tissues and structures and tissues can be distinguished: salivary gland (sg); nervous tissues or central nervous mass (nm); ovary (ov) with oocytes (OOCs) and egg (eg) adjacent to the ventriculus (v) and posterior midgut (pm); lumen of digestive tract filled with digestive cells (DCs) or floating cells originating mainly from the midgut epithelium and comprising phagocytes containing a bolus of food; generative cell (GCs) and lateral cell (LCs) cells located within caeca as well as from microvilli epithelial cells (MCs) located within the posterior midgut. DCs with undigested plant material containing cyclotides, to be finally extracted as fecal pellets are located in the rectum (r). Ventricular epithelium (VE) is located within the dorsal and ventral parts of the ventriculus, whereas the dorsal midgut is lined with dorsal epithelium (DE). Cyclotides, indicated with red fluorescence, are in close proximity to the epithelial cells (GCs, LCs, MCs), digestive cells (DCs) and ovary (ov). Abbreviations of mite anatomical structures adapted from Bensoussan et al.[60]. Scale bars: a, b = 25 µm; d-f = 50 µm.
Figure 2LC–MS analysis of extracts prepared from mite feces and eggs collected after 2 weeks of TSSM female feeding on V. odorata. The 3 + peaks corresponding to three (cyO2, cyO3 and cyO8) and two (cyO2, cyO3) different cyclotides were found in the mass spectra of the feces and egg extracts, respectively.
Figure 3V. odorata response to mite feeding in terms of cyclotide production: (a) Comparison of mean relative quantities of example peptides denoted with their monoisotopic molecular masses, between infested and control plants, 5 days and 3 weeks after infestation. Asterisks indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 by ANOVA and t-test. (b) The list of significantly (p < 0.05, ANOVA, t-test) more abundant (higher) or less abundant (lower) peptides in infested and control plants. (c) MALDI-MSI image showing particular peptides appearing in the leaf mesophyll in response to mite infestation—heat scale, the warmer color indicates higher abundance. Cyclotides are named according to their monoisotopic molecular masses.
Figure 4Effect of host plant (V. odorata, V. uliginosa, P. vulgaris) on T. urticae mite reproductive potential and feeding (green house experiments): (a) mean number of all T. urticae developmental stages per cm2 per leaf 12 weeks after infestation. (b) Percentage of T. urticae-injured leaves per plant 3 weeks after infestation. (c) Mean number of all T. urticae developmental stages per plant per 2 weeks (d) T. urticae population growth rate (PGR) 2 weeks after plant infestation. Mean values followed by different lowercase or uppercase letters are significantly (p < 0.05) different by ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
The effect of the host-plant on the mean duration of the T. urticae developmental stages and different reproductive parameters.
| n | n | n | p-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg (days) | 4.2 a | 49 | 4.4 a | 52 | 4.2 a | 49 | 0.256 |
| Egg to adult (days) | 9.3 a | 43 | 10.2 b | 46 | 9.3 a | 43 | 0.001 |
| Survival rate of immatures | 0.86 a | 50 | 0.85 a | 54 | 0.81 a | 54 | 0.797 |
| Female longevity (days) | 9.4 a | 30 | 10.7 b | 27 | 11.8 c | 36 | < 0.001 |
| Total fecundity (eggs per female) | 113.9 a | 32.6 b | 10.8 c | < 0.001 | |||
| Daily fecundity (eggs per female per day) | 9.1 a | 2.3 b | 0.8 c | < 0.001 | |||
Different lowercase letters within rows indicate the means to be significantly different (p < 0.05); n = number of replicates.
The comparison of T. urticae population parameters on different host-plants.
| Population parameter (SE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Net reproductive rate ( | 51.8 (4.18) a | 6.9 (0.98) b | 4.9 (0.86) b |
| Mean generation time ( | 14.4 (0.35) a | 16.6 (0.42) b | 15.5 (0.32) c |
| Intrinsic rate of population increase ( | 0.27 (0.0005) a | 0.12 (0.0008) b | 0.10 (0.0120) b |
| Finite rate of population increase (λ) | 1.30 (0.0069) a | 1.12 (0.0088) b | 1.11 (0.0133) b |
Standard errors are given in parentheses. Different lowercase letters within rows indicate significant differences between parameter estimates (p < 0.05).