Valeriy Zenin1, Julia Ivanova1, Natalia Pugovkina1, Alla Shatrova1, Nikolay Aksenov1, Irina Tyuryaeva1, Kseniya Kirpichnikova1, Ivan Kuneev2, Andrei Zhuravlev3, Ekaterina Osyaeva3, Ekaterina Lyublinskaya2, Ilyuza Gazizova2, Nikita Guriev2, Olga Lyublinskaya4. 1. Department of Intracellular Signaling and Transport, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretskii pr. 4, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia. 2. Department of Intracellular Signaling and Transport, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretskii pr. 4, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia; Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya st. 29, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russia. 3. Department of Intracellular Signaling and Transport, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretskii pr. 4, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia; Faculty of Biology, St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia. 4. Department of Intracellular Signaling and Transport, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tikhoretskii pr. 4, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia. Electronic address: olga.lyublinskaya@incras.ru.
Abstract
Application of genetically encoded biosensors of redox-active compounds promotes the elaboration of new methods for investigation of intracellular redox activities. Previously, we have developed a method to measure quantitatively the intracellular concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in living cells using genetically encoded biosensor HyPer. In the present study, we refined the method and applied it for comparing the antioxidant system potency in human cells of different phenotypes by measuring the gradient between the extracellular and cytoplasmic H2O2 concentrations under conditions of H2O2-induced external oxidative stress. The measurements were performed using cancer cell lines (K-562 and HeLa), as well as normal human cells - all expressing HyPer in the cell cytoplasm. As normal cells, we used three isogenic lines of different phenotypes - mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from MSCs by reprogramming, and differentiated iPSC progenies with the phenotype resembling precursory MSCs. When exposing cells to exogenous H2O2, we showed that at low oxidative loads (<50 μM of H2O2) the gradient depended on extracellular H2O2 concentration. At high loads (>50 μM of H2O2), which caused the exhaustion of thioredoxin activity in the cell cytoplasm, the gradient stabilized, pointing out that it is the functional status of the thioredoxin-depended enzymatic system that drives the dependence of the H2O2 gradient on the oxidative load in human cells. At high H2O2 concentrations, the cytoplasmic H2O2 level in cancer cells was found to be several hundred times lower than the extracellular one. At the same time, in normal cells, extracellular-to-intracellular gradient amounted to thousands of times. Upon reprogramming, the potency of cellular antioxidant defense increased. In contrast, differentiation of iPSCs did not result in the changes in antioxidant system activity in the cell cytoplasm, assuming that intensification of the H2O2-detoxification processes is inherent to a period of early human development.
Application of genetically encoded biosensors of redox-active compounds promotes the elaboration of new methods for investigation of intracellular redox activities. Previously, we have developed a method to measure quantitatively the intracellular concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in living cells using genetically encoded biosensor HyPer. In the present study, we refined the method and applied it for comparing the antioxidant system potency in human cells of different phenotypes by measuring the gradient between the extracellular and cytoplasmic H2O2 concentrations under conditions of H2O2-induced external oxidative stress. The measurements were performed using cancer cell lines (K-562 and HeLa), as well as normal human cells - all expressing HyPer in the cell cytoplasm. As normal cells, we used three isogenic lines of different phenotypes - mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from MSCs by reprogramming, and differentiated iPSC progenies with the phenotype resembling precursory MSCs. When exposing cells to exogenous H2O2, we showed that at low oxidative loads (<50 μM of H2O2) the gradient depended on extracellular H2O2 concentration. At high loads (>50 μM of H2O2), which caused the exhaustion of thioredoxin activity in the cell cytoplasm, the gradient stabilized, pointing out that it is the functional status of the thioredoxin-depended enzymatic system that drives the dependence of the H2O2 gradient on the oxidative load in human cells. At high H2O2 concentrations, the cytoplasmic H2O2 level in cancer cells was found to be several hundred times lower than the extracellular one. At the same time, in normal cells, extracellular-to-intracellular gradient amounted to thousands of times. Upon reprogramming, the potency of cellular antioxidant defense increased. In contrast, differentiation of iPSCs did not result in the changes in antioxidant system activity in the cell cytoplasm, assuming that intensification of the H2O2-detoxification processes is inherent to a period of early human development.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), being a product of oxygen metabolism, is generated in all cells of aerobic organisms and participates in various metabolic and signaling cascades [[1], [2], [3]]. The maintenance of physiological H2O2 intracellular concentration is crucial for cell functioning and viability. Stressful imbalance caused by the elevation of intracellular level of H2O2 over the basal one, which is strictly controlled by cellular redox systems, is classified as ‘oxidative stress’ or, more specifically, ‘oxidative distress’ (the latter is opposed to ‘oxidative eustress’ – an elevation in H2O2 level arising from the physiological needs) [3,4]. The excessive accumulation of intracellular H2O2 can occur due to internal pathological processes and external factors disturbing cellular redox metabolism, as well as due to an increase of H2O2 flow from the outside of a cell. The increase of extracellular H2O2 level can, in turn, arise from environmental stresses (such as radiation, tobacco smoke, toxicants, etc.), activity of the immune system, or due to metabolic disorders in surrounding tissues [4,5].Under conditions of externally induced oxidative stress, the antioxidant defense system, which includes cellular enzymes responsible for H2O2 elimination (peroxiredoxins, glutathione peroxidases, catalase) and reduction of oxidized proteins (thioredoxins and glutaredoxins), counteracts the damaging effects of stress. The finite rate of penetration of H2O2 through plasma membrane and its effective intracellular elimination result in the emergence of H2O2 concentration gradient – the level of H2O2 inside a cell appears to be much lower than that outside [[6], [7], [8]]. The value of the extracellular-to-intracellular H2O2 gradient can be therefore considered as a measure of antioxidative activity in cells. A first theoretical assessment of the gradient in oxidatively stressed human cells was made by Antunes and Cadenas in 2000 [6]. The results of the analysis performed showed that, if H2O2 is constantly present outside the cells, the established intracellular concentration of H2O2 can be ten-fold lower in comparison to extracellular. Later, considering the contribution of such effective H2O2-detoxifying enzymes as peroxiredoxins, it became clear that the gradient can be much higher - about several hundred [8], and that it is established very quickly - during the first milliseconds after the stress induction [9]. Most recent findings showed that this gradient can vary, being dependent on the oxidative load on a cell [10]. At high H2O2 doses, the oxidation/reduction cycle of peroxiredoxins can collapse due to their hyperoxidation [11] that causes the drop in H2O2-detoxification capacity in a cell. Consequently, the extracellular-to-intracellular H2O2 gradients are low at high oxidative loads and high at low ones. It was found that in yeast the H2O2 gradient, which is established at a high oxidative load, is several tens, and at low - about several hundred [10]. To what extent the H2O2 gradient in human cells can vary is still not clear.Recently, we have shown that intracellular concentration of H2O2 can be measured using HyPer, a genetically encoded H2O2 biosensor [12]. HyPer is a chimeric protein [13] composed from the permuted yellow fluorescent protein (cpYFP) and H2O2-sensitive domain of the bacterial transcription factor OxyR, which is responsible for sensing H2O2 in E.coli [14]. Upon HyPer exposure to H2O2, the OxyR domain undergoes conformational changes which influence the protonation of tyrosine residues in cpYFP that, in turn, leads to changes in its fluorescence [15]. In our previous study [12], we have demonstrated that in H2O2-exposed cells, intracellular H2O2 concentration can be derived from the analysis of kinetics of HyPer oxidation, monitored with the use of flow cytometry. Performing such measurements in the model cells (human erythroleukemia K-562 cells, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline), we found that the gradient between the extracellular and cytoplasmic H2O2 concentrations is about 400-fold under micromolar extracellular H2O2 loads. In the present study, we refined the method presented earlier, aiming to achieve a more accurate estimation of H2O2 gradients in oxidatively stressed cells resuspended in a standard growth medium. The improved method allows to measure the extracellular-to-intracellular H2O2 gradients and evaluate the potency of antioxidant defense system in cells of different phenotypes at various oxidative loads. Using this method, we compared H2O2-detoxifying activity in the cytoplasm of human cancer cell lines (K-562 and HeLa), mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from MSCs by reprogramming, and differentiated progenies of iPSCs with the phenotype resembling precursory MSCs (iPSC-MSCs).
Materials and methods
Cell cultures
K-562 cells. Human K-562 erythroleukemia cells (Russian Cell Culture Collection, Institute of Cytology, St.Petersburg, Russia) were transduced [16] with lentiviral vectors (Evrogen Ltd, Moscow, Russia) encoding HyPer-cyto or SypHer-cyto proteins. SypHer is a redox-inactive modification of cpYFP-OxyR protein, which is commonly used as an optimum control molecule for HyPer [15]. K-562 cells were cultured in RPMI medium (Biolot Ltd, Russia) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone, USA), 1% l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and were passaged twice a week at the split ratio of 1:4.HeLa cells. HeLa (cervix carcinoma) cells (Russian Cell Culture Collection, Institute of Cytology, St.Petersburg, Russia) were transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding HyPer-cyto (Evrogen Ltd, Moscow, Russia) using the protocol described previously [16]. Cells were cultivated in DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone, USA), 1% l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were subcultured twice a week at the split ratio of 1:5.Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs). Human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells were isolated from a desquamated endometrium of menstrual blood from a healthy donor (line#2804 [17]). Cells exhibited properties typical of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell cultures: fibroblast-like morphology, multipotency, and expression of standard surface markers [18]. MSCs were cultivated in DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone, USA), 1% l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were maintained at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and were subcultured twice a week at the split ratio of 1:3. At the 6th passage, MSCs were transduced [16] with the lentiviral vector encoding HyPer-cyto (Evrogen Ltd, Moscow, Russia). In the experiments, cells cultivated for up to 15 passages were used.Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). iPSCs were derived from MSCs expressing HyPer in the cell cytoplasm using CytoTune-iPS 2.0 Sendai Reprogramming Kit according to manufacturer's instruction. iPSCs obtained possess clonal growth morphology, a diploid karyotype, express pluripotency markers Oct-4, NANOG, SSEA-4, SOX2, alkaline phosphatase, and are able to differentiate into cell types of three germ layers (see Results section). Cells were cultivated at 37° С and normoxia (21% О2) with 5% CO2 content on Matrigel-coated (Corning, USA) dishes in mTeSR medium (STEMCELL Technologies, Canada) and subcultured mechanically once a week.Differentiated iPSC progenies (iPSC-MSCs). iPSCs, which constantly express HyPer-cyto, were spontaneously differentiated through embryoid bodies (EB) formation. iPSC colonies were cut into pieces and plated into non-adhesive plastic dishes in the Knockout DMEM/F12 (Gibco, USA) medium supplemented with 20% serum replacement, 1% non-essential amino acids (Sigma, USA), 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (Merck, USA), 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Within one week, cystic EB were formed. After that, EB were transferred into the adhesive tissue culture dishes and cultivated in DMEM/F12 medium (Gibco, USA) with 10% FBS (HyClone, USA), 1% l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Spontaneously differentiated cells derived from the attached EB were subcultured once a week at the split ratio 1:3. After 2–3 passages, the culture was composed of morphologically homogenous fibroblast-like HyPer-expressing cells which were positive for the mesenchymal marker vimentin. We characterized these cells and revealed that their phenotype was similar to that of parental MSCs. Cells were positive for CD 90, CD 105, CD 73, CD 44, CD 140b marker expression, negative for HLA DR, and possessed typical for MSCs ability to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes (see Results section). Basing on the minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stem/stromal cells formulated by the International Society for Cellular Therapy [18], we classified differentiated progenies of iPSCs as MSCs and named them iPSC-MSCs.
H2O2-induced oxidative stress
To investigate the ability of cells to counteract oxidative stress, both short-term (10-min) and long-term (24-h) incubations with H2O2 have been exploited. K-562, HeLa, MSCs, and iPSC-MSCs were seeded in 3 cm dishes or 24-well plates overnight before the experiments (25,000 cells per 1 mL of medium). iPSCs were seeded at arbitrary cell density in 24-well plates 3 days before the exposure to H2O2.Short-term (10-min) exposure to H2O2 was used for the analysis of HyPer oxidation immediately after the oxidative stress induction. In these experiments, prior to H2O2 exposure, adherent cells (HeLa, MSCs, iPSCs, iPSC-MSCs) were harvested with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA solution. After that, these cells, as well as suspension K-562 cells, were resuspended in the fresh DMEM/F12 medium (supplemented with FBS and l-glutamine) at the density of 25,000 cells/mL. Cell samples were aliquoted in the flow cytometry tubes (600 μL per tube) and incubated at standard growth conditions for 20 min to provide adaptation of cells to the new environment. After that, H2O2 at concentrations ranged from 2 to 100 μM was added to the tubes and cell samples were immediately analyzed with CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA). High dilution of cell suspensions provided near steady-state conditions of the oxidative load. At cell density used, the drop of extracellular H2O2 concentration due to the peroxide scavenging by cells was negligible during the first 10 min after H2O2 addition [12]. In the experiments on thioredoxin system inhibition, before harvesting, cells were preincubated for 3 h with the auranofin, thioredoxin reductase inhibitor, at standard growth conditions at a concentration of 100 nM. Auranofin was also added to the fresh medium used for cell harvesting and resuspension.Long-term (24-h) expositions were used to assess the damaging effects of H2O2 concentrations applied. Prior to H2O2 exposure, cells in several dishes (wells) were counted to calculate the doses of H2O2 added. Doses were quantified on the mole-per-cell basis [19] by the normalization of the added H2O2 molar quantity to the number of cells in the dish (well). In the rest of the dishes (wells) growth medium was changed to the fresh DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with FBS and l-glutamine. H2O2 was added to cells at concentrations ranging from 2 to 800 μM (corresponding doses 0.08–14 pmol/cell) and was incubated for 24 h. After that, cell viability was evaluated with the use of flow cytometry.
Monitoring of HyPer oxidation kinetics
Kinetics of HyPer oxidation was monitored with CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA). Analysis lasted for 10 min after H2O2 addition. During the analysis, a mixture of air and CO2 (5%) was supplied into the sample tube to stabilize physiological pH in the cell medium. Constant CO2 pumping made it possible to prevent variations in the HyPer signal arising from the alkalization of the cell medium, which is usually detected during long-term measurements in atmospheric air. In the cell cultures used for experiments, the fraction of HyPer-expressing cells was about 90–95%. HyPer fluorescence in gated HyPer-positive cells was examined by monitoring fluorescence signal at 525 nm registered at 488 nm excitation (hereafter denoted as signal), which reflects the accumulation of oxidized form of sensor [16]. Similarly, the signal measured at 525 nm under 405 nm excitation (hereafter denoted as signal) was used to monitor the accumulation of the reduced sensor.For the calibration of HyPer signals (described in the Results section), and were also measured in the cells pretreated with the high doses of dithiothreitol (DTT, 30 mM, 10 min) and H2O2 (0.5 mM, 5 min) to achieve a total HyPer reduction and oxidation, respectively. Cell pretreatments were performed at standard growth conditions (37 °C and 5% of CO2) in flow cytometry tubes.
Calculation of gradient between the extracellular and intracellular H2O2 concentrations
To measure the extracellular-to-intracellular H2O2 concentration gradient in cells exposed to exogenous H2O2 we used equations derived by Brito and Antunes [20]. According to these equations, upon the oxidative stress induction, the fraction of reduced HyPer begins to fall and, under the permanent external oxidative load, reaches with time the steady-state level due to the concurrent processes of sensor oxidation and reduction. In the case of full HyPer reduction at the initial moment of time, the kinetics of HyPer oxidation is described as follows [12]:In these equations, refers to the fraction of HyPer in the reduced form observed in a cell at time t. is the steady-state level of the reduced HyPer fraction established with time. and are apparent first-order rate constants for the oxidation and reduction of HyPer (corresponding to and in Ref. [20]), respectively. depends on the activity of thiol-disulfide exchange systems of the cells. depends on the intracellular level of Н2О2 [20]:where is an intracellular peroxide concentration averaged over the cites of HyPer localization (in this study it is a cell cytosol), and is the second-order rate constant for the reaction between HyPer and hydrogen peroxide (known from the previously published studies [21]).Under conditions of high oxidative loads, which result in the full HyPer oxidation (), , according to Eq. (2), and the kinetics of HyPer oxidation is described by simple exponential dependence (Eq. 12 [20]):Eqs. (1), (4), upon linearization, are transformed into the following dependencies (Eqs. (8) and (16) [20]):In the present study, measuring the dependence after the oxidative stress induction and fitting it with Eq. (1), we determined
, as well as (Eq. (3)). Using the value of and concentration of exogenous H2O2 added to cell suspension , we calculated the extracellular-to-intracellular H2O2 gradient:By measuring H2O2 gradients in cells of different phenotypes, we compare the potency of cell antioxidant systems.
Cell viability
To assess H2O2 toxic effect, cells were exposed to H2O2 at various concentrations for 24 h. Cell viability was estimated by flow cytometry (CytoFLEX flow cytometer, Beckman Coulter, USA; 488 nm laser) using propidium iodide staining (50 μg/mL).
Immunofluorescence
Cells grown on coverslips were fixed with 4% formalin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin for 40 min to block non-specific binding, treated with the primary antibodies for 1 h, washed with PBS/0.1% Tween-20, treated with secondary antibodies for 1 h, washed with PBS/0.1% Tween-20 and counterstained with 1 μg/mL DAPI. The coverslips were mounted in 2% propyl gallate and visualized using a confocal microscope (Olympus FV3000, Olympus Corporation). Primary antibodies: anti-Oct-4 (C-10) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), anti-NANOG (Invitrogen, USA), anti-SOX-2 (Millipore, USA), anti-SSEA-4 (Millipore, USA), anti-Vimentin (BD Pharmingen, USA), all in dilution 1:100.
Cell phenotyping
Cells were harvested with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA solution, washed, suspended in PBS supplemented with 2% FBS, incubated with antibodies to phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies CD 90, CD 105, CD 73, CD, 140b, HLA DR (all from BD Pharmingen), CD 44 (eBioscience, USA) for 30 min in flow cytometry tubes at room temperature in the dark following the manufacturer instructions, and analyzed using CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA; 561 nm laser).
Statistics
All experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Data are presented as means ± SD, when indicated. Statistical significance in the pairwise comparisons was evaluated by t-test, and p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Flow cytometry histograms and microscopy images shown in the paper correspond to the most representative experiments.
Results
Our previous study [12] showed that upon exposure of HyPer-expressing cells to exogenous H2O2, its intracellular concentration can be estimated quantitatively by analyzing HyPer oxidation kinetics just after the addition of H2O2 to the cell suspension. To monitor the oxidation kinetics, we measured HyPer fluorescence signals by flow cytometry at different time points after the oxidative stress induction and then derived the percentages of oxidized/reduced sensor from these measurements. In the present study, we developed a method that allows real-time tracking of HyPer fluorescence which afterward can be directly converted to the kinetic curves. To elaborate the method, we used human erythroleukemia K-562 cells stably expressing HyPer in the cell cytoplasm (Supplemental Fig. S1).
Elaboration of a method for real-time monitoring of HyPer oxidation
HyPer has two excitation maxima at 420 and 500 nm and emits intense green fluorescence peaked at 516 nm. Upon oxidation of HyPer, the intensity of fluorescence excited at 420 nm () decreases, while the fluorescence excited at 500 nm () proportionally increases. Due to this, it is possible to monitor the ratio between the oxidized and reduced forms of HyPer upon the induction of oxidative stress in real time by recording the time-dependent changes in the fluorescence signals. Indeed, in our experiments, the addition of exogenous H2O2 to K-562 cells led to the immediate gradual increase of signal with simultaneous decrease of the signal, associated with the accumulation of oxidized and exhaustion of the reduced forms of HyPer, respectively (Fig. 1A). In the case of arbitrary device settings, the increase in signal is not equal to the decrease in . However, by varying the voltage or gain settings for the cytometer detectors, the changes in fluorescence signals can be aligned (Fig. 1A). Under these conditions, the sum signal from the oxidized and reduced form of HyPer ( + ) does not depend on the redox status of the sensor and represents only the overall amount of HyPer protein in the cell cytoplasm. Consequently, the normalization of each signal ( or ) to the sum signal allows reducing the level of noise, which results, to a great extent, from various HyPer expression levels in cells (Fig. 1B). That kind of signal processing enables the improvement of the accuracy of the kinetic measurements.
Fig. 1
Real-time monitoring of HyPer oxidation in K562 cells. (A–B) Increase of the HyPer fluorescence signal and simultaneous decrease of the signal registered after the addition of H2O2 (8 μM) to cell suspension; (A) – raw data, (B) – signals normalized to the total signal ( + ); normalization significantly reduces the signal noise; dynamics of fluorescence signals reflects the accumulation of oxidized and exhaustion of reduced forms of HyPer followed after H2O2 addition. (C) Oxidized and reduced HyPer fractions in the control (untreated) K562 cells, cells exposed to DTT (30 mM, 10 min), as well as kinetic curves depicting HyPer oxidation after addition of different concentrations of H2O2. Abbreviations: , EX488/FL525 signal; , EX405/FL525 signal; MFU, mean fluorescence units; , reduced HyPer fraction; , oxidized HyPer fraction; DTT, dithiothreitol; Cntr, control (untreated) cells.
Real-time monitoring of HyPer oxidation in K562 cells. (A–B) Increase of the HyPer fluorescence signal and simultaneous decrease of the signal registered after the addition of H2O2 (8 μM) to cell suspension; (A) – raw data, (B) – signals normalized to the total signal ( + ); normalization significantly reduces the signal noise; dynamics of fluorescence signals reflects the accumulation of oxidized and exhaustion of reduced forms of HyPer followed after H2O2 addition. (C) Oxidized and reduced HyPer fractions in the control (untreated) K562 cells, cells exposed to DTT (30 mM, 10 min), as well as kinetic curves depicting HyPer oxidation after addition of different concentrations of H2O2. Abbreviations: , EX488/FL525 signal; , EX405/FL525 signal; MFU, mean fluorescence units; , reduced HyPer fraction; , oxidized HyPer fraction; DTT, dithiothreitol; Cntr, control (untreated) cells.In the next step, we calibrated the normalized HyPer signals in K-562 cells using high concentrations of H2O2 and DTT providing the total oxidation and total reduction of the sensor, respectively. We found that a saturative dose of H2O2 (0.5 mM, 5 min) resulted in the full oxidation of HyPer, whereas the addition of various concentrations of DTT (up to 30 mM) did not lead to the significant changes of HyPer fluorescence signals, which indicates the fully reduced status of HyPer in the cell cytoplasm under physiological conditions. The calibration allowed linking the HyPer fluorescence signal and the fraction of reduced sensor in the cell cytoplasm :where is a normalized signal measured in the cells of interest at violet laser excitation, and and are normalized signals measured in untreated cells and cells treated with the saturative dose of H2O2, respectively. Using Eq. (8), we finally obtained the kinetic curves which described the oxidation of sensor at various oxidative loads (Fig. 1C).In addition, since HyPer is a pH-dependent sensor, to ensure that measurements are not influenced by pH variations under the experimental conditions used, a set of experiments with K-562 cells constantly expressing SypHer-cyto, redox-inactive modification of cpYFP-OxyR protein (an optimum control molecule for HyPer that exhibits identical fluorescence properties, pH sensitivity, intracellular localization, etc. [15]), have been performed. SypHer-expressing cells did not respond to H2O2 treatments (2–50 μM) (see Supplement, Fig. S2), giving confidence in the reliability of kinetic HyPer-based measurements.Thus, at the first step of experiments, we worked out the method that allows real-time monitoring of the reduced HyPer fraction upon exposure of cells to exogenous H2O2 (Fig. 1C).
Measurement of the extracellular-to-intracellular H2O2 gradient
Next, we analyzed the kinetics of HyPer oxidation upon the oxidative stress induction in K-562 cells. We confirmed that the dependence of reduced HyPer fraction on time is described by Eq. (1) (Methods Section) and can be linearized in the logarithmic scale, in accordance with Eqs. (5), (6)) (Fig. 2A). Fitting the kinetic curves with Eq. (1) allowed us to assess and then calculate the gradient between the extracellular and cytoplasmic concentration of H2O2 established at different oxidative loads (Table 1). At low H2O2 concentrations, the gradient was close to 103 and tended to decrease with increasing loads. In contrast, at high concentrations, which caused full HyPer oxidation, the gradient did not depend on added H2O2 concentration (Fig. 2B) and was equal to 440 ± 20. Importantly, the same gradient value was observed at any oxidative load in cells with the diminished thioredoxin activity (preincubated with thioredoxin reductase inhibitor auranofin), pointing out that the gradient stabilization at high oxidative loads is associated with the saturation of thioredoxin-depended enzymatic activity, presumably, activity of peroxiredoxins (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2
Measurement of the peroxide gradient in K-562 cells exposed to different concentrations of HO. (A) Linearization of the kinetic curves for the reduced HyPer fraction drop after H2O2 addition to cell suspension; the slope represents the sensor oxidation rate constant (Eq. (6), Methods section). (B) Gradients between the extracellular and cytoplasmic peroxide concentrations in the control cells and cells preincubated with the thioredoxin reductase inhibitor auranofin measured at different H2O2 loads (calculated using Eq. (7), Methods section). (C) Total (PI-) and HyPer-positive (HyPer+/PI-) populations of viable K-562 cells, as well as non-viable (PI+) cell fractions, revealed after 24-h exposure to different concentrations of H2O2 (corresponding H2O2 doses are shown below the axis). (D) Gradients between the extracellular (20 μM) and cytoplasmic peroxide concentrations at different levels of HyPer expression in cells; in each cell sample (N = 3), cell populations with low and high HyPer expression were selected by gating (see Supplement Fig. S3), HyPer content in these populations was assessed by normalizing the mean total fluorescence signal ( + ) in gated cells to the mean total signal in ungated HyPer-positive cells in this sample. Data (B–D) are shown as mean ± SD (N > 3). Abbreviations: , reduced HyPer fraction; , rate constant of HyPer oxidation; Cntr, control cells (untreated with auranofin); Aur, auranofin-treated cells; PI-, propidium iodide-negative (viable) cells; PI+, propidium iodide-positive (non-viable) cells; HyPer+/PI-, HyPer-positive viable cells; , EX488/FL525 signal; , EX405/FL525 signal.
Table 1
Intracellular H2O2 levels, H2O2 gradients, as well as rate constants of HyPer oxidation, derived from the analysis of HyPer oxidation kinetics in H2O2-exposed K562 cells.
Abbreviations: k, apparent first-order rate constant of HyPer oxidation; , ratio between the extracellular and intracellular (cytoplasmic) peroxide concentration; [HO] external hydrogen peroxide concentration; [HO], intracellular (cytoplasmic) H2O2 concentration arising from cell exposure to the external peroxide; , steady-state level of the reduced HyPer fraction established with time due to the concurrent processes of sensor oxidation and reduction at different oxidative loads.
Measurement of the peroxide gradient in K-562 cells exposed to different concentrations of HO. (A) Linearization of the kinetic curves for the reduced HyPer fraction drop after H2O2 addition to cell suspension; the slope represents the sensor oxidation rate constant (Eq. (6), Methods section). (B) Gradients between the extracellular and cytoplasmic peroxide concentrations in the control cells and cells preincubated with the thioredoxin reductase inhibitor auranofin measured at different H2O2 loads (calculated using Eq. (7), Methods section). (C) Total (PI-) and HyPer-positive (HyPer+/PI-) populations of viable K-562 cells, as well as non-viable (PI+) cell fractions, revealed after 24-h exposure to different concentrations of H2O2 (corresponding H2O2 doses are shown below the axis). (D) Gradients between the extracellular (20 μM) and cytoplasmic peroxide concentrations at different levels of HyPer expression in cells; in each cell sample (N = 3), cell populations with low and high HyPer expression were selected by gating (see Supplement Fig. S3), HyPer content in these populations was assessed by normalizing the mean total fluorescence signal ( + ) in gated cells to the mean total signal in ungated HyPer-positive cells in this sample. Data (B–D) are shown as mean ± SD (N > 3). Abbreviations: , reduced HyPer fraction; , rate constant of HyPer oxidation; Cntr, control cells (untreated with auranofin); Aur, auranofin-treated cells; PI-, propidium iodide-negative (viable) cells; PI+, propidium iodide-positive (non-viable) cells; HyPer+/PI-, HyPer-positive viable cells; , EX488/FL525 signal; , EX405/FL525 signal.Intracellular H2O2 levels, H2O2 gradients, as well as rate constants of HyPer oxidation, derived from the analysis of HyPer oxidation kinetics in H2O2-exposed K562 cells.Abbreviations: k, apparent first-order rate constant of HyPer oxidation; , ratio between the extracellular and intracellular (cytoplasmic) peroxide concentration; [HO] external hydrogen peroxide concentration; [HO], intracellular (cytoplasmic) H2O2 concentration arising from cell exposure to the external peroxide; , steady-state level of the reduced HyPer fraction established with time due to the concurrent processes of sensor oxidation and reduction at different oxidative loads.To check whether the H2O2 concentrations used were cytotoxic, we assessed the viability of K-562 cells on the next day after the stress induction. 24-hour incubation with H2O2 at concentrations equal or lower than 8 μM did not cause cytotoxic effect, while 25 μM (which matches the dose of 1 pmol/cell) led to 50% cell death and 50 μM (2 pmol/cell) was almost completely lethal (Fig. 2C).Then, we checked the impact of HyPer expression on the cell response to H2O2-induced stress. First, we evaluated the proportion of HyPer-positive and negative cells in K-562 populations that survived the stress and found no difference with the control (nontreated) samples (Fig. 2C). Further, we analyzed the kinetics of HyPer oxidation in cells with the different expression levels of the sensor. Using gating technique (for details see Supplement, Fig. S3), we chose for analysis cell populations with the same average cell size (based on the forward scattering signal) but differed in the average fluorescence intensity ( + ) by 6 times. Again, no difference in H2O2 gradients was found between these populations (Fig. 2D).Thus, we showed that under conditions of external steady-state H2O2-induced stress, our method enables accurately evaluating the extracellular-to-intracellular gradient of H2O2 concentration.
Resistance to H2O2-induced stress of cells with different phenotypes
In the last part of the study, in order to compare the potency of antioxidant defense systems of different cells, we evaluated the H2O2 gradients established in oxidatively stressed human cells of different phenotypes. To ensure that our results would not depend on the individual characteristics of a donor, we chose for our experiments the set of cell lines that consists of human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) expressing HyPer in the cell cytoplasm, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from MSCs using cell reprogramming method, and differentiated progenies of iPSCs with the phenotype resembling precursory MSCs (iPSC-MSCs). The percentage of iPSCs expressing the sensor remained the same, and in iPSC-MSCs decreased slightly compared to parental MSC cultures (91% against 94%) (Fig. 3). iPSCs possessed all canonical features of pluripotent cells, such as clonal growth morphology, expression of Oct-4, Sox-2, NANOG, SSEA-4, alkaline phosphatase, and the ability to differentiate into cell types of three germ layers (Fig. 4A). iPSC-MSCs meet all minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stem/stromal cells formulated by the International Society for Cellular Therapy [18] – cells were characterized by fibroblast-like morphology, expression of mesodermal marker vimentin, MSC-specific surface markers (CD 90, CD 105, CD 44, CD73, CD 140b) (Fig. 4B), and ability to differentiate into osteoblasts and adipocytes (Supplemental Fig. S4). Apart from the lineages mentioned, we included in the comparison the cancer cell line HeLa that is widely used as a model system in redox biology studies.
Fig. 3
A percentage of HyPer-positive cells in different cell lines assayed. Abbreviations: MSCs, human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells derived from MSCs by reprogramming; iPSC-MSCs, MSC-like differentiated progenies of iPSCs; HyPer-, Hyper-negative cell population; HyPer+, HyPer-positive cell population.
Fig. 4
Characterization of iPSC and iPSC-MSC cultures. (A) Morphology of iPSC clone and expression of pluripotent markers (1st and 2nd rows); the ability of iPSCs to differentiate into different cell types of three germ layers (3rd row), scale bar = 10 μm. (B) Characterization of iPSC-MSC culture – cell morphology, expression of mesenchymal marker vimentin and MSC-specific surface markers, scale bar = 100 μm. Abbreviations: MSCs, human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells derived from MSCs by reprogramming; iPSC-MSCs, MSC-like differentiated progenies of iPSCs; AP, alkaline phosphatase.
A percentage of HyPer-positive cells in different cell lines assayed. Abbreviations: MSCs, human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells derived from MSCs by reprogramming; iPSC-MSCs, MSC-like differentiated progenies of iPSCs; HyPer-, Hyper-negative cell population; HyPer+, HyPer-positive cell population.Characterization of iPSC and iPSC-MSC cultures. (A) Morphology of iPSC clone and expression of pluripotent markers (1st and 2nd rows); the ability of iPSCs to differentiate into different cell types of three germ layers (3rd row), scale bar = 10 μm. (B) Characterization of iPSC-MSC culture – cell morphology, expression of mesenchymal marker vimentin and MSC-specific surface markers, scale bar = 100 μm. Abbreviations: MSCs, human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells derived from MSCs by reprogramming; iPSC-MSCs, MSC-like differentiated progenies of iPSCs; AP, alkaline phosphatase.For these cell lines, we repeated the experiments carried out on K-562 cells. The results partly resembled previously obtained data. In particular, the flow cytometer settings, adjusted earlier to perform normalization of HyPer signals (see Results, 3.1. Section), occurred to be suitable for all types of the cells. Besides, carrying out the calibration of HyPer signals, we found that the addition of DTT in the concentrations of up to 30 mM did not lead to the changes in HyPer fluorescence in any cell line, indicating a full reduction of HyPer in the cytoplasm of cells under normal conditions. In contrast, the reaction of cells to H2O2-induced stress varied between the assayed cell lines (Fig. 5 A, B). For example, a strong difference was observed in the amounts of external H2O2 ensuring full sensor oxidation after the 10-min exposure (Fig. 5 B). 20 μM of H2O2 led to the full oxidation of HyPer only in K-562 cells, while 100 μM oxidized the sensor almost completely in all types of the cells (Fig. 5 B). Correspondingly, to compare the potency of antioxidant defense in different cells both at low and high oxidative loads, we chose the 20–100 μM range of external H2O2 concentrations. To characterize these loads, we investigated their impact on cell viability after 24-h exposure to H2O2 and found a significant difference between the oxidative stress responses in various types of the cells. For example, in some lines (ex: MSCs), 50 μM concentration (2 pmol/cell) did not lead to the cell death (Fig. 5A) but caused DNA breaks (Supplemental Fig. S5). At the same time, in iPSC cultures, this dose caused the death of approximately 50% of the cells (Fig. 5A), and in K-562 cells, as we showed previously (Fig. 2C), it was absolutely lethal. Based on these findings, we classified the 20–100 μM range of H2O2 concentrations as cell-damaging under the experimental conditions used, at least in the case of long-term expositions.
Fig. 5
Measurement of the peroxide gradient in human cells of different phenotypes upon exposure to different concentrations of HO. (A) Viability of MSCs and iPSCs after long-term exposure to different concentrations of H2O2: total (PI-) and HyPer-positive (HyPer+/PI-) populations of viable cells, as well as non-viable (PI+) cell fractions, revealed after 24-h exposure to different concentrations of H2O2 (corresponding H2O2 doses are shown below the axis). (B) Steady-state level of the reduced HyPer fraction established due to the concurrent processes of sensor oxidation and reduction at different oxidative loads in different cells. (C) Kinetics of the reduced HyPer fraction drop after H2O2 (50 μM) addition to cell suspensions; curves were fitted (red lines) with Eq. (1) (Methods section), and H2O2 gradient values (shown in D) were derived from these fits. (D) Gradients between the extracellular and cytoplasmic peroxide concentrations measured at different H2O2 loads in different cell lines (calculated using Eqs. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), Methods section). Data (A, B, D) are shown as mean ± SD (N > 3). Abbreviations: MSCs, human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells derived from MSCs by reprogramming; iPSC-MSCs, MSC-like differentiated progenies of iPSCs; , reduced HyPer fraction; , the steady-state level of the reduced HyPer fraction; PI-, propidium iodide-negative (viable) cells; PI+, propidium iodide-positive (non-viable) cells; HyPer+/PI-, HyPer-positive viable cells. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Measurement of the peroxide gradient in human cells of different phenotypes upon exposure to different concentrations of HO. (A) Viability of MSCs and iPSCs after long-term exposure to different concentrations of H2O2: total (PI-) and HyPer-positive (HyPer+/PI-) populations of viable cells, as well as non-viable (PI+) cell fractions, revealed after 24-h exposure to different concentrations of H2O2 (corresponding H2O2 doses are shown below the axis). (B) Steady-state level of the reduced HyPer fraction established due to the concurrent processes of sensor oxidation and reduction at different oxidative loads in different cells. (C) Kinetics of the reduced HyPer fraction drop after H2O2 (50 μM) addition to cell suspensions; curves were fitted (red lines) with Eq. (1) (Methods section), and H2O2 gradient values (shown in D) were derived from these fits. (D) Gradients between the extracellular and cytoplasmic peroxide concentrations measured at different H2O2 loads in different cell lines (calculated using Eqs. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), Methods section). Data (A, B, D) are shown as mean ± SD (N > 3). Abbreviations: MSCs, human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells; iPSCs, induced pluripotent stem cells derived from MSCs by reprogramming; iPSC-MSCs, MSC-like differentiated progenies of iPSCs; , reduced HyPer fraction; , the steady-state level of the reduced HyPer fraction; PI-, propidium iodide-negative (viable) cells; PI+, propidium iodide-positive (non-viable) cells; HyPer+/PI-, HyPer-positive viable cells. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)Finally, for all cell lines used, we analyzed the kinetics of sensor oxidation during the first 10 min immediately after H2O2 addition to cell suspensions and calculated the H2O2 gradients in the 20–100 μM range of extracellular concentrations (Fig. 5C and D). We found that the kinetics of HyPer oxidation was exponential in all cell types. Similar to K-562 cells, gradients of H2O2 obtained from the kinetic measurements did not depend on extracellular H2O2 concentration at high oxidative loads (>50 μM), being substantially lower than those at 20 μM of H2O2. Interestingly, in normal human cells (MSCs, iPSCs, and iPSC-MSCs), the gradients were significantly higher than in cancer (K-562 and HeLa). The highest gradients (more than 103 under all loads tested), and, therefore, the most potent antioxidant defense, was found in iPSCs and iPSC-MSCs. In iPSCs, gradients occurred two times higher than that in their parental MSC cultures. Surprisingly, differentiation of iPSCs, which led to the restoration of mesenchymal phenotype, did not result in alterations in antioxidant defense capacity. The antioxidant activity in the cytoplasm of progeny cells (iPSC-MSCs) was similar to that in their pluripotent parental cells and exceeded that of their MSC ancestors.
Discussion
The high rate of redox reactions together with the limited number of analytical methods make it hard to implement the quantitative analysis of various intracellular redox parameters. In this study, H2O2 biosensor HyPer was used as a reporter protein whose oxidation/reduction dynamics allows quantitative assessment of the redox activity in living cells. Analyzing the oxidation dynamics of HyPer sensor in the cytoplasm of the cells exposed to exogenous H2O2, we measured the gradient that is established between the extracellular and cytoplasmic H2O2 concentrations.We found that in all human cell assayed the H2O2 gradient depends on the oxidative loads on cells that perfectly fits with data, previously obtained in the experiments on yeast [10]. At low (<50 μM) H2O2 extracellular concentrations which resulted in the partial cytoplasmic sensor oxidation, the gradient decreased as oxidative loads increased. At high oxidative loads ensuring complete oxidation of HyPer, the gradient value stabilized. It is clear (see Eq. (2)) that the sensor can be fully oxidized only under the condition of , i.e. at complete oxidation of thiol-disulfide exchange enzymes which are responsible for the HyPer redox-active domain reduction (presumably, thioredoxin system [10,22,23]). Correspondingly, we suggested that it is the functional status of the thioredoxin-depended enzymatic system that drives the dependence of the H2O2 gradient on the oxidative load. To check this assumption, using the thioredoxin reductase inhibitor auranofin, we performed experiments on cells with diminished thioredoxin activity. In auranofin-treated cells, the values of the H2O2 gradient perfectly matched those observed in the control cells at high oxidative loads. Thus, our data confirm the principal role of the thioredoxin-depended enzymes (presumably, peroxiredoxins) in the processes of H2O2 detoxification at low oxidative loads in human cells assayed. Importantly, it has been recently shown that the same enzymatic systems shape the intracellular H2O2 gradients as well [27].Measurements of H2O2 gradients made it possible to characterize quantitatively the potency of the antioxidant defense system in human cells of different phenotypes – in cancer and normal cell lines. The gradient in cancer cell lines K-562 and HeLa measured at high oxidative loads amounted to several hundred times that fits well with theoretical and empirical estimates made previously [8,12]. At the same time, we revealed that this gradient can be significantly higher in normal cells, exceeding the value of 103. When analyzing these data, we assumed that K-562 and HeLa cells, maintained in culture for a prolonged time, may differ significantly from cells of parental tumors due to their high adaptive capacity and plasticity. The latter can be the cause of the observed difference in gradients in comparison to normal human cells recently isolated from the donor tissues. Evidently, the method elaborated in this study can be used further to perform a more accurate comparison of redox systems of cancerous and normal human cells.To overcome the problem of specificity of cell sources while comparing the antioxidant potency of cells with different phenotypes, we focused on isogenic human cell lines obtained using the cell reprogramming technique. MSCs expressing HyPer in the cell cytoplasm were reprogrammed to iPSCs. In the latter cells, the H2O2 gradients were markedly increased in comparison to MSCs both at low and high oxidative loads that points to the enhancement of cell antioxidant defense upon reprogramming. To clarify whether the increased antioxidant activity in the cell cytoplasm is a characteristic feature of pluripotent cells, we differentiated iPSCs and measured the H2O2 gradients in differentiated progeny cells (iPSC-MSCs). iPSC-MSCs exhibited a phenotype similar to the MSC ancestors, but, surprisingly, possessed much higher antioxidant activity, resembling that of parental iPSCs. This observation allows us to suggest that the intensification of the H2O2-detoxification process is not a characteristic feature of pluripotent phenotype but is rather related to a period of early human development.When analyzing the ability of different cell cultures to resist H2O2-induced stress, it was important to investigate the impact of applied oxidative loads on cell physiology. For this purpose, we evaluated the viability of cells exposed to H2O2. It is known that under oxidative stress conditions, the damaging factor is not a concentration, but a dose of H2O2 that is detoxified by a cell. Therefore we used long-term (24-h) incubations in the viability tests to achieve the total decomposition of the H2O2 by cells, which enabled us to assess exactly the applied H2O2 doses. Under such conditions and the cell density of 25,000 cells per 1 mL of the medium, the 20–100 μM range of H2O2 concentrations corresponded to the 0.8–4 pmole/cell range of H2O2 doses. Cell viability tests showed that these doses were not cytotoxic to MSCs but yet led to the damage of cell DNA. Our previous studies [24,25] revealed that genotoxic stress induced in these cells by H2O2 dose of 4 pmol/cell can result in premature cellular senescence. In contrast, in the case of iPSCs and K-562 cells, the doses in the range of 0.8–4 pmole/cell caused cytotoxic effects, at least in the part of cell population. In the experiments with K-562 cells we used the wider range of H2O2 doses, and the lowest ones (<0.3 pmole/cell), which did not result in the thioredoxin system exhaustion, were not cytotoxic. Correspondingly, we classified the 20–100 μM range of H2O2 concentrations, which we used for the comparison of antioxidant activity in the different cell types, as damaging ones, associating this damage with the exhaustion of thiol-disulfide capacity in cells observed under the high oxidative loads. Intriguingly, whether these loads are within or beyond the range that cells could see in vivo, still remains unclear. According to published data, the 20–100 μM concentrations exceed the most probable normal values of plasma H2O2 concentrations in humans (1–5 μM), and fall into the diapason which is probably related to certain disease states or chronic inflammation [26]. At the same time, the ratio of plasma volume in tissue capillaries to the mass of cells contacting with plasma is much lower than the ratio of media volume to the mass of cells in the suspensions we used. Therefore, we speculate that the doses of H2O2 which cells detoxified during the 24-h incubations in our experiments (at least, at 20 and may be at 50 μM concentrations) can be relevant to the situation of chronic oxidative stresses in vivo, when cells are exposed to plasma H2O2 concentrations of tens of micromoles for quite a long time. Simultaneously, we suppose that the lowest concentrations (<20 μM), which we used in the experiments with K-562 cells, may have relevance to the normal cell physiology in vivo.Apart from monitoring HyPer oxidation under the oxidative stress conditions, we have evaluated the basal level of HyPer oxidation in different cell types. We found that the cytoplasmic HyPer sensor is fully reduced in cells with normal metabolism suspended in a complete growth medium. These observations are consistent with the already published research [22] but differ from our previously obtained data related to K-562 cells suspended in PBS [12]. According to [12], HyPer is slightly oxidized (∼10%) under such conditions. Our present findings suggest that this effect is probably due to the lack of nutrients in PBS. Perhaps, the full growth medium is needed to support the normal redox metabolism ensuring full reduction of the redox-active thiol groups of HyPer under basal conditions. Indeed, the value of H2O2 gradient measured under low oxidative loads in K-562 cells suspended in PBS (∼400 [12]) is very close to that measured in the present study at fully exhausted thioredoxin activity in the cell cytoplasm (440 ± 20).Another question we raised is the impact of ectopic expression of HyPer on antioxidant system activity in cells under conditions of oxidative distress. To answer it, we compared the H2O2 gradients in K-562 cells with low and high amounts of HyPer and found no differences in these values. Moreover, after administration of exogenous H2O2, the percentage of dead cells was equal in HyPer-positive and negative cells. In accordance with the previously published findings [10], the obtained results can be explained by the slow rate of HyPer redox-active domain reduction. Due to its slow reduction, HyPer cannot compete with the enzymes providing H2O2 detoxification, and thus it cannot be considered as an antioxidant.
Conclusions
In this study, we investigated the potency of antioxidant defense in human cells of different phenotypes based on the quantitative evaluation of the gradient between the extracellular and cytoplasmic H2O2 concentrations under the steady-state oxidative load. We show that at low oxidative loads the gradient depends on the extracellular H2O2 concentration. At the same time, at high oxidative loads, which cause the full exhaustion of thioredoxin activity in the cell cytoplasm, the gradient stabilized, pointing out that it is the functional status of the thioredoxin-depended enzymatic system that drives the dependence of the H2O2 gradient on the oxidative load in human cells. We found that in widely used cancer cell lines (K-562 and HeLa) it amounts to hundreds of times. In normal human cells (MSCs, iPSCs derived from MSCs, and differentiated iPSC progenies with MSC-like phenotype) the gradient can exceed 103. We found that the reprogramming of the cells causes the enhancement of their antioxidant potency, while subsequent differentiation of iPSCs does not necessarily lead to changes in the activity of antioxidant defense systems, assuming that intensification of the H2O2-detoxification process is inherent to a period of early human development. We suggest that the method elaborated in this study can be applied for further in-depth studies of redox activities in human cells.
Authors: V I Zemel'ko; T M Grinchuk; A P Domnina; I V Artsybasheva; V V Zenin; A A Kirsanov; N K Bichevaia; V S Korsak; N N Nikol'skiĭ Journal: Tsitologiia Date: 2011
Authors: M Dominici; K Le Blanc; I Mueller; I Slaper-Cortenbach; Fc Marini; Ds Krause; Rj Deans; A Keating; Dj Prockop; Em Horwitz Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2006 Impact factor: 5.414
Authors: Dmitry S Bilan; Luke Pase; Linda Joosen; Andrey Yu Gorokhovatsky; Yulia G Ermakova; Theodorus W J Gadella; Clemens Grabher; Carsten Schultz; Sergey Lukyanov; Vsevolod V Belousov Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Joseph B Lim; Troy F Langford; Beijing K Huang; William M Deen; Hadley D Sikes Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Aleksandra Borodkina; Alla Shatrova; Polina Abushik; Nikolay Nikolsky; Elena Burova Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.682