| Literature DB >> 35112891 |
Yulin Shi1, Xiaojuan Hu2, Ji Cui1, Jun Li1, Zijuan Bi1, Jiacai Li1, Hongyuan Fu1, Yu Wang1, Longtao Cui1, Jiatuo Xu1.
Abstract
Fatigue is one of the most common subjective symptoms of abnormal health state, there is still no reliable and stable evaluation method to distinguish disease fatigue and non-disease fatigue. Studies have shown that tongue diagnosis and pulse diagnosis are the reflection of overall state of the body. This study aims to explore the distribution rules and correlation of data of tongue and pulse in population with disease fatigue and sub-health fatigue and provide a new method of clinical diagnosis of fatigue from the perspective of tongue diagnosis and pulse diagnosis. In this study, a total of 736 people were selected and divided into healthy controls (n = 250), sub-health fatigue group (n = 242), and disease fatigue group (n = 244). TFDA-1 tongue diagnosis instrument and PDA-1 pulse diagnosis instrument were used to collect tongue image and sphygmogram, simple correlation analysis and canonical correlation analysis were used to analyze the correlation of tongue and pulse data about the two groups of fatigue people. The study had shown that tongue and pulse data could provide a certain reference for the diagnosis of different types of fatigue, tongue and pulse data in disease fatigue and sub-health fatigue population had different distribution rules, and there was a simple correlation and canonical correlation in the disease fatigue population, the coefficient of canonical correlation was .649 (P <.05).Entities:
Keywords: correlation analysis; fatigue; health assessments; pulse data; tongue data
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35112891 PMCID: PMC8819780 DOI: 10.1177/00469580211060781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Inquiry ISSN: 0046-9580 Impact factor: 1.730
Figure 1.TFDA-1 digital tongue and face diagnosis instrument. (A) Front view; (B) Profile view.
Figure 2.Tongue image analysis system.
Figure 3.PDA-1 digital pulse diagnosis instrument.
Figure 4.Sphygmogram and its parameters.
Baseline Characteristics of the 3 Groups.
| Groups | Number | Sex [N (%)] | Age (year) | BMI (‾X ± S ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Minimum | Maximum | Average (‾X ± S ) | |||
| Healthy controls | 250 | 161 (64.4) | 89 (35.6) | 19 | 62 | 32.62 ± 8.98 | 22.83 ± 3.41 |
| Sub-health fatigue group | 242 | 146 (60.3) | 96 (39.7) | 20 | 74 | 33.69 ± 9.00 | 22.76 ± 3.56 |
| Disease fatigue group | 244 | 183 (75.0) | 61 (25.0) | 26 | 79 | 51.18 ± 12.53##** | 25.92 ± 3.35##** |
#vs. Healthy controls, P < .05, ##vs. Healthy controls, P<.01.
*vs. Sub-health fatigue group, P<.05, **vs. Sub-health fatigue group, P<.01.
Statistical Analysis of Tongue Parameters in the 3 Groups [Mean (Standard Deviation), Median (P25, P75)].
| Domain | Parameters | Healthy controls (N = 250) | Sub-health fatigue group (N = 242) | Disease fatigue group (N = 244) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB | RGB | TB-R | 152.62 (18.37) | 152.62 (18.37)# | 155.12 (20.71) |
| TB-G | 98.12 (15.32) | 98.12 (15.32) | 101.14 (18.31) | ||
| TB-B | 99.50 (90.75,112.00) | 153.00 (138.75,166.00) | 115.50 (100.00,125.00)##** | ||
| Lab | TB-L | 103.75 (5.68) | 103.75 (5.68) | 104.84 (6.53) | |
| TB-a | 19.37 (17.57,21.70) | 20.47 (18.10,22.68) | 21.12 (18.69,23.47)## | ||
| TB-b | 6.41 (5.03,7.70) | 5.04 (.55,6.93)## | 1.71 (-5.33,5.29)##** | ||
| HIS | TB-H | 179.13 (177.00,181.66) | 176.63 (167.87,180.00)## | 170.80 (153.12,176.89)##** | |
| TB-I | 117.00 (107.00,129.00) | 118.00 (106.00,130.00) | 120.00 (112.00,135.00)##* | ||
| TB-S | .17 (.15,0.19) | .18 (.15,0.20) | .19 (.16,0.21)## | ||
| YCrCb | TB-Y | 114.98 (13.50) | 114.98 (13.50) | 117.98 (15.76) | |
| TB-Cr | 151.61 (149.13,153.91) | 151.31 (148.38,153.87) | 150.66 (147.88,153.85) | ||
| TB-Cb | 120.28 (118.98,121.48) | 121.31 (119.83,125.29)## | 124.01 (120.70,130.69)##** | ||
| Texture index | TB-Con | 71.73 (50.19,103.64) | 68.00 (40.93,98.95) | 58.53 (39.59,86.81)## | |
| TB-ASM | .08 (.07,0.09) | .08 (.07,0.10) | .09 (.07,0.10)## | ||
| TB-ENT | 1.21 (1.13,1.29) | 1.20 (1.08,1.28) | 1.16 (1.08,1.26)## | ||
| TB-MEAN | .03 (.02,0.03) | .02 (.02,0.03) | .02 (.02,0.03)## | ||
| TC | RGB | TC-R | 149.00 (139.00,161.25) | 149.00 (137.00,163.00) | 151.00 (139.25,165.75) |
| TC-G | 114.00 (103.00,125.00) | 114.00 (103.00,125.00) | 116.00 (105.00,129.75) | ||
| TC-B | 116.00 (102.00,127.25) | 118.00 (105.00,134.25) | 127.50 (112.00,147.00)##** | ||
| Lab | TC-L | 107.91 (103.96,111.42) | 107.93 (104.09,112.05) | 109.14 (105.15,113.13)# | |
| TC-a | 12.76 (2.75) | 12.76 (2.75) | 12.71 (3.03) | ||
| TC-b | 4.84 (3.77,6.20) | 3.26 (-1.05,5.10)## | .88 (−6.59,4.08)##** | ||
| HIS | TC-H | 181.80 (180.00,184.84) | 177.49 (161.89,182.42)## | 169.76 (132.73,178.59)##** | |
| TC-I | 126.00 (115.00,137.00) | 127.00 (115.00,140.00) | 131.00 (119.00,146.00)##* | ||
| TC-S | .12 (.03) | .12 (.03) | .12 (.03) | ||
| YCrCb | TC-Y | 122.89 (113.53,132.11) | 122.94 (113.80,133.72) | 125.92 (116.58,137.03)# | |
| TC-Cr | 143.66 (141.08,146.02) | 143.23 (140.63,145.77) | 142.44 (138.66,145.91)## | ||
| TC-Cb | 121.78 (120.71,123.11) | 123.24 (121.63,127.73)## | 125.61 (122.51,133.18)##** | ||
| Area index | perAll | .47 (.40,0.60) | .52 (.41,0.76) | .62 (.43,0.90)##* | |
| perPart | 1.14 (1.04,1.26) | 1.09 (1.03,1.22) | 1.05 (1.02,1.18)##* | ||
| Texture index | TC-Con | 84.21 (62.39,118.75) | 88.45 (58.84,125.37) | 88.45 (61.33,122.12) | |
| TC-ASM | .07 (.06,0.08) | .07 (.06,0.08) | .07 (.06,0.08) | ||
| TC-ENT | 1.25 (1.18,1.33) | 1.26 (1.17,1.34) | 1.26 (1.18,1.34) | ||
| TC-MEAN | .03 (.02,0.03) | .03 (.02,0.03) | .03 (.02,0.03) | ||
#vs. Healthy controls, P < .05, ##vs. Healthy controls, P < .01.
*vs. Sub-health fatigue group, P < .05, **vs. Sub-health fatigue group, P < .01.
Statistical Analysis of Pulse Parameters in the 3 Groups [Mean (Standard Deviation), Median (P25, P75)].
| Parameters | Healthy controls (N = 250) | Sub-health fatigue group (N = 242) | Disease fatigue group (N = 244) |
|---|---|---|---|
| t1 (s) | .13 (.12,0.14) | .13 (.12,0.14) | .14 (.13,0.15)##** |
| t2 (s) | .22 (.21,0.23) | .22 (.21,0.24) | .23 (.22,0.26)##** |
| t3 (s) | .26 (.25,0.27) | .26 (.25,0.27) | .27 (.25,0.29)##** |
| t4 (s) | .34 (.33,0.36) | .34 (.33,0.36) | .36 (.34,0.38)##** |
| t5 (s) | .41 (.39,0.42) | .40 (.39,0.42) | .41 (.39,0.43) |
| h1 (mv) | 113.47 (96.27,135.47) | 110.79 (90.78,132.93) | 115.17 (88.77,146.18) |
| h2 (mv) | 80.59 (62.17,100.60) | 76.80 (61.22,97.16) | 77.15 (56.36,114.12) |
| h3 (mv) | 72.90 (56.40,90.74) | 70.12 (56.00,87.64) | 71.40 (52.46,104.51) |
| h4 (mv) | 43.92 (35.09,53.81) | 41.99 (33.05,51.75) | 41.67 (30.19,56.70) |
| h5 (mv) | 3.50 (1.13,6.71) | 3.24 (.65,6.09) | .87 (-.53,3.16)##** |
| w1 (s) | .17 (.13,0.19) | .17 (.14,0.19) | .18 (.15,0.20)##* |
| w2 (s) | .11 (.09,0.14) | .11 (.09,0.14) | .13 (.11,0.16)##** |
| W1/t | .20 (.17,0.23) | .20 (.18,0.23) | .22 (.19,0.24)##* |
| W2/t | .13 (.11,0.16) | .14 (.11,0.17) | .16 (.13,0.18)##** |
| h1/t1 | 878.98 (744.81,1063.52) | 862.66 (695.92,1044.81) | 837.90 (642.70,1047.82) |
| h3/h1 | .64 (.56,0.74) | .64 (.56,0.73) | .67 (.57,0.77) |
| h4/h1 | .38 (.33,0.44) | .38 (.33,0.44) | .37 (.31,0.42) |
| As (mv⋅s) | .20 (.19,0.23) | .21 (.19,0.23) | .22 (.20,0.24)##** |
| Ad (mv⋅s) | .11 (.09,0.13) | .11 (.09,0.13) | .09 (.07,0.11)##** |
| t (s) | .83 (.77,0.90) | .82 (.77,0.90) | .82 (.75,0.92) |
#vs. Healthy controls, P < .05, ##vs. Healthy controls, P < .01.
*vs. Sub-health fatigue group, P < .05, **vs. Sub-health fatigue group, P < .01.
Figure 5.Correlation heat map of tongue and pulse parameters in the three groups of population. (A): Correlation heat map of tongue and pulse parameters in the healthy controls; (B): Correlation heat map of tongue and pulse parameters in the sub-health fatigue group; (C): Correlation heat map of tongue and pulse parameters in the disease fatigue group.
Simple Correlation Analysis of Tongue and Pulse Parameters in the Healthy Controls.
| Parameters | t1 |
|---|---|
| TB-Con | −.143* |
| TB-ASM | .139* |
| TB-ENT | −.144* |
| TB-MEAN | −.144* |
Simple Correlation Analysis of Tongue and Pulse Parameters in the Disease Fatigue Group.
| Parameters | t1 | t3 | h5 | w2 | w1/t | w2/t |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TB-Con | −.136* | .096 | .062 | −.027 | .009 | −.079 |
| TB-ASM | .135* | −.118 | −.052 | .037 | .010 | .098 |
| TB-ENT | −.134* | .106 | .061 | −.032 | .001 | −.090 |
| TB-MEAN | −.134* | .105 | .056 | −.030 | .003 | −.086 |
| TB-b | −.159* | .071 | .138* | −.106 | −.112 | −.175** |
| TB-H | −.141* | .056 | .118 | −.082 | −.075 | −.143* |
| TB-Cb | .160* | −.077 | −.130* | .105 | .116 | .179** |
| TC-B | .136* | −.012 | −.104 | .076 | .100 | .127* |
| TC-b | −.134* | .068 | .136* | −.085 | −.106 | −.158* |
| TC-H | −.125* | .054 | .143* | −.068 | −.068 | −.127* |
| TC-Cr | −.153* | .135☆ | .126 | −.104 | −.194* | −.231** |
| TC-Cb | .131* | −.066 | −.128* | .077 | .102 | .153* |
| perAll | .186** | −.113 | −.184** | .153* | .186* | .247** |
| perPart | −.190** | −.037 | .148* | −.071 | −.100 | −.141* |
*, P < .05, **, P < .01.
Figure 6.Correlation heat map of tongue and pulse parameters in the healthy controls.
Figure 7.Correlation heat map of tongue and pulse parameters in the disease fatigue group.
Canonical Correlation of Tongue and Pulse Parameters in the Disease Fatigue Group.
| Canonical variable | Correlation | Eigenvalue | Wilks Statistic | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | .627 | .649 | .025 | 1.180 | .002 |
| 2 | .612 | .600 | .042 | 1.098 | .061 |
| 3 | .575 | .493 | .067 | 1.011 | .424 |
| 4 | .553 | .441 | .100 | .936 | .831 |
| 5 | .541 | .414 | .144 | .861 | .982 |
| 6 | .499 | .332 | .203 | .776 | 1.000 |
| 7 | .465 | .276 | .271 | .703 | 1.000 |
| 8 | .427 | .223 | .345 | .636 | 1.000 |
| 9 | .387 | .176 | .422 | .579 | 1.000 |
| 10 | .343 | .133 | .496 | .533 | 1.000 |
| 11 | .328 | .121 | .563 | .501 | 1.000 |
| 12 | .319 | .113 | .631 | .466 | 1.000 |
| 13 | .286 | .089 | .702 | .420 | 1.000 |
| 14 | .255 | .069 | .765 | .381 | 1.000 |
| 15 | .233 | .057 | .818 | .35 | 1.000 |
| 16 | .216 | .049 | .865 | .320 | 1.000 |
| 17 | .186 | .036 | .907 | .284 | 1.000 |
| 18 | .183 | .035 | .940 | .256 | 1.000 |
| 19 | .130 | .017 | .972 | .186 | 1.000 |
| 20 | .107 | .011 | .989 | .160 | 1.000 |
Loadings Coefficient of Tongue Parameters in the Disease Fatigue Group.
| Parameters | Canonical Loadings | Cross Loadings | Parameters | Canonical Loadings | Cross Loadings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| perAll | −.271 | −.17 | TB-I | .082 | .051 |
| perPart | .344 | .216 | TB-S | −.279 | −.175 |
| TB-Con | −.054 | −.034 | TC-H | .332 | .208 |
| TC-Con | −.099 | −.062 | TC-I | −.101 | −.063 |
| TB-ASM | −.073 | −.046 | TC-S | .055 | .034 |
| TB-ENT | .037 | .023 | TB-L | .137 | .086 |
| TB-MEAN | −.002 | −.001 | TB-a | −.22 | −.138 |
| TC-ASM | .088 | .055 | TB-b | .347 | .218 |
| TC-ENT | −.087 | −.055 | TC-L | −.082 | −.051 |
| TC-MEAN | −.076 | −.048 | TC-a | .187 | .117 |
| TB-B | −.073 | −.046 | TC-b | .34 | .213 |
| TB-R | .146 | .092 | TB-Y | .131 | .082 |
| TB-G | .155 | .097 | TB-Cr | .084 | .053 |
| TC-R | .065 | .041 | TB-Cb | −.344 | −.216 |
| TC-G | −.092 | −.057 | TC-Y | −.067 | −.042 |
| TC-B | −.227 | −.142 | TC-Cr | .353 | .222 |
| TB-H | .222 | .14 | TC-Cb | −.349 | −.219 |
Loadings Coefficient of Pulse Parameters in the Disease Fatigue Group.
| Parameters | Canonical Loadings | Cross Loadings | Parameters | Canonical Loadings | Cross Loadings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t1 | −.085 | −.053 | w1 | −.111 | −.07 |
| t2 | .202 | .126 | w2 | −.176 | −.11 |
| t3 | .228 | .143 | w1/t | −.213 | −.134 |
| t4 | .268 | .168 | w2/t | −.271 | −.17 |
| t5 | .387 | .243 | h1/t1 | .01 | .006 |
| h1 | .022 | .014 | h3/h1 | −.147 | −.092 |
| h2 | −.117 | −.074 | h4/h1 | .114 | .071 |
| h3 | −.098 | −.061 | As | .095 | .06 |
| h4 | .053 | .033 | Ad | −.037 | −.023 |
| h5 | −.209 | −.131 | t | .037 | .023 |
Figure 8.The first canonical correlation variable structure diagram of the tongue and pulse parameters in the disease fatigue group.