Yingzi Zhang1, Supriya Mohile2, Eva Culakova2, Sally Norton1, Kah Poh Loh2, Sindhuja Kadambi2, Lee Kehoe3, Valerie Aarne Grossman4, Victor G Vogel5, Brian L Burnette6, Thomas P Bradley7, Marie Flannery1. 1. School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA. 2. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA. 4. SCOREboard Patient and Caregiver Advocacy Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA. 5. Geisinger Cancer Institute NCORP, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA. 7. Northwell Health NCORP, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: One primary source of psychological distress in patients with cancer and their caregivers is uncertainty. However, the uncertainty trajectory and its relationship between older adults with advanced cancer and their caregivers have rarely been examined. This study describes the uncertainty trajectory in patient-caregiver dyads, explores the effect of geriatric assessment (GA) intervention on trajectory, and examines the interdependent relationship of uncertainty. METHODS: This secondary analysis used longitudinal data from a national cluster-randomized controlled trial examining a GA intervention compared to usual care. Participants completed the modified 9-item Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale at enrollment, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The dyadic growth model and cross-lagged actor-partner interdependence model were used. RESULTS: A total of 397 dyads (patient age M = 76.81 ± SD5.43; caregiver age M = 66.69 ± SD12.52) were included. Both had a trend of decreased uncertainty over time (b = -0.16, p < 0.01). There was a greater decrease in uncertainty among caregivers in the GA group than those in the usual care group (b = -0.46, p = 0.02). For both patients and caregivers, their past uncertainty was a significant predictor of their own current uncertainty (i.e., actor effect, p < 0.01). The individual's past uncertainty was a significant predictor of the other dyad member's current uncertainty (i.e., partner effect, p < 0.05), indicating an interdependent relationship between patient and caregiver uncertainty over time. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest patient and caregiver function as a unit with uncertainty levels affecting each other. Future interventions could build on GA to address uncertainty for older patients with advanced cancer and caregivers.
OBJECTIVE: One primary source of psychological distress in patients with cancer and their caregivers is uncertainty. However, the uncertainty trajectory and its relationship between older adults with advanced cancer and their caregivers have rarely been examined. This study describes the uncertainty trajectory in patient-caregiver dyads, explores the effect of geriatric assessment (GA) intervention on trajectory, and examines the interdependent relationship of uncertainty. METHODS: This secondary analysis used longitudinal data from a national cluster-randomized controlled trial examining a GA intervention compared to usual care. Participants completed the modified 9-item Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale at enrollment, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. The dyadic growth model and cross-lagged actor-partner interdependence model were used. RESULTS: A total of 397 dyads (patient age M = 76.81 ± SD5.43; caregiver age M = 66.69 ± SD12.52) were included. Both had a trend of decreased uncertainty over time (b = -0.16, p < 0.01). There was a greater decrease in uncertainty among caregivers in the GA group than those in the usual care group (b = -0.46, p = 0.02). For both patients and caregivers, their past uncertainty was a significant predictor of their own current uncertainty (i.e., actor effect, p < 0.01). The individual's past uncertainty was a significant predictor of the other dyad member's current uncertainty (i.e., partner effect, p < 0.05), indicating an interdependent relationship between patient and caregiver uncertainty over time. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest patient and caregiver function as a unit with uncertainty levels affecting each other. Future interventions could build on GA to address uncertainty for older patients with advanced cancer and caregivers.
Authors: Vida Ghodraty Jabloo; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Margaret Fitch; Ann E Tourangeau; Ana Patricia Ayala; Martine T E Puts Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Laurel L Northouse; Darlene W Mood; Ann Schafenacker; James E Montie; Howard M Sandler; Jeffrey D Forman; Maha Hussain; Kenneth J Pienta; David C Smith; Trace Kershaw Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Arti Hurria; Daneng Li; Kurt Hansen; Sujata Patil; Ravi Gupta; Christian Nelson; Stuart M Lichtman; William P Tew; Paul Hamlin; Enid Zuckerman; Jonathan Gardes; Sewanti Limaye; Mark Lachs; Eva Kelly Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laurel Northouse; Ann Schafenacker; Kathryn L C Barr; Maria Katapodi; Hyojin Yoon; Kelly Brittain; Lixin Song; David L Ronis; Larry An Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.592