BACKGROUND: Few intervention studies have been conducted to help couples manage the effects of prostate cancer and maintain their quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine whether a family-based intervention could improve appraisal variables (appraisal of illness or caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness), coping resources (coping strategies, self-efficacy, communication), symptom distress, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer and their spouses. METHODS: For this clinical trial, 263 patient-spouse dyads were stratified by research site, phase of illness, and treatment; then, they were randomized to the control group (standard care) or the experimental group (standard care plus a 5-session family intervention). The intervention targeted couples' communication, hope, coping, uncertainty, and symptom management. The final sample consisted of 235 couples: 123 couples in the control group and 112 couples in the experimental group. Data collection occurred at baseline before randomization and at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: At 4-month follow-up, intervention patients reported less uncertainty and better communication with spouses than control patients, but they reported no other effects. Intervention spouses reported higher quality of life, more self-efficacy, better communication, and less negative appraisal of caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness, and symptom distress at 4 months compared with controls, and some effects were sustained to 8 months and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS:Men with prostate cancer and their spouses reported positive outcomes from a family intervention that offered them information and support. Programs of care need to be extended to spouses who likely will experience multiple benefits from intervention. 2007 American Cancer Society
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few intervention studies have been conducted to help couples manage the effects of prostate cancer and maintain their quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine whether a family-based intervention could improve appraisal variables (appraisal of illness or caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness), coping resources (coping strategies, self-efficacy, communication), symptom distress, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer and their spouses. METHODS: For this clinical trial, 263 patient-spouse dyads were stratified by research site, phase of illness, and treatment; then, they were randomized to the control group (standard care) or the experimental group (standard care plus a 5-session family intervention). The intervention targeted couples' communication, hope, coping, uncertainty, and symptom management. The final sample consisted of 235 couples: 123 couples in the control group and 112 couples in the experimental group. Data collection occurred at baseline before randomization and at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: At 4-month follow-up, intervention patients reported less uncertainty and better communication with spouses than control patients, but they reported no other effects. Intervention spouses reported higher quality of life, more self-efficacy, better communication, and less negative appraisal of caregiving, uncertainty, hopelessness, and symptom distress at 4 months compared with controls, and some effects were sustained to 8 months and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS:Men with prostate cancer and their spouses reported positive outcomes from a family intervention that offered them information and support. Programs of care need to be extended to spouses who likely will experience multiple benefits from intervention. 2007 American Cancer Society
Authors: Lixin Song; Laurel L Northouse; Thomas M Braun; Lingling Zhang; Bernadine Cimprich; David L Ronis; Darlene W Mood Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Catherine Benedict; Eric S Zhou; Mikal Rasheed; Lara Traeger; Bruce R Kava; Mark Soloway; Sara Czaja; Michael H Antoni Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2013-03
Authors: Leslie R Schover; Andrea L Canada; Ying Yuan; Dawen Sui; Leah Neese; Rosell Jenkins; Michelle M Rhodes Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Donna M Zulman; Ann Schafenacker; Kathryn L C Barr; Ian T Moore; Jake Fisher; Kathryn McCurdy; Holly A Derry; Edward W Saunders; Lawrence C An; Laurel Northouse Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-01-23 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Eric S Zhou; Sharon L Bober; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Jim C Hu; Philip W Kantoff; Christopher J Recklitis Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-07-14