Literature DB >> 35111616

Fully automated radiomic screening pipeline for osteoporosis and abnormal bone density with a deep learning-based segmentation using a short lumbar mDixon sequence.

Yinxia Zhao1, Tianyun Zhao2, Shenglan Chen3, Xintao Zhang1, Mario Serrano Sosa2, Jin Liu4, Xianfu Mo1, Xiaojun Chen4, Mingqian Huang5, Shaolin Li4, Xiaodong Zhang1, Chuan Huang2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although lumbar bone marrow fat fraction (BMFF) has been demonstrated to be predictive of osteoporosis, its utility is limited by the requirement of manual segmentation. Additionally, quantitative features beyond simple BMFF average remain to be explored. In this study, we developed a fully automated radiomic pipeline using deep learning-based segmentation to detect osteoporosis and abnormal bone density (ABD) using a <20 s modified Dixon (mDixon) sequence.
METHODS: In total, 222 subjects underwent quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and lower back magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Bone mineral density (BMD) were extracted from L1-L3 using QCT as the reference standard; 206 subjects (48.8±14.9 years old, 140 females) were included in the final analysis, and were divided temporally into the training/validation set (142/64 subjects). A deep-learning network was developed to perform automated segmentation. Radiomic models were built using the same training set to predict ABD and osteoporosis using the mDixon maps. The performance was evaluated using the temporal validation set comprised of 64 subjects, along with the automated segmentation. Additional 25 subjects (56.1±8.8 years, 14 females) from another site and a different scanner vendor was included as independent validation to evaluate the performance of the pipeline.
RESULTS: The automated segmentation achieved an outstanding mean dice coefficient of 0.912±0.062 compared to manual in the temporal validation. Task-based evaluation was performed in the temporal validation set, for predicting ABD and osteoporosis, the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.925/0.899, 0.923/0.667, 0.789/0.873, 0.844/0.844, respectively. These values were comparable to that of manual segmentation. External validation (cross-vendor) was also performed; the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.688/0.913, 0.786/0.857, 0.545/0.944, 0.680/0.920 for ABD and osteoporosis prediction, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our work is the first attempt using radiomics to predict osteoporosis with BMFF map, and the deep-learning based segmentation will further facilitate the clinical utility of the pipeline as a screening tool for early detection of ABD. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Osteoporosis; chemical shift imaging; deep learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 35111616      PMCID: PMC8739149          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  36 in total

1.  Prediction of Abnormal Bone Density and Osteoporosis From Lumbar Spine MR Using Modified Dixon Quant in 257 Subjects With Quantitative Computed Tomography as Reference.

Authors:  Yinxia Zhao; Mingqian Huang; Jie Ding; Xintao Zhang; Karl Spuhler; Shaoyong Hu; Mianwen Li; Wei Fan; Lin Chen; Xiaodong Zhang; Shaolin Li; Quan Zhou; Chuan Huang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Measurement of fat content in vertebral marrow using a modified dixon sequence to differentiate benign from malignant processes.

Authors:  Hye Jin Yoo; Sung Hwan Hong; Dong Hyun Kim; Ja-Young Choi; Hee Dong Chae; Bo Mi Jeong; Joong Mo Ahn; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Fat fraction estimation of the vertebrae in females using the T2*-IDEAL technique in detection of reduced bone mineralization level: comparison with bone mineral densitometry.

Authors:  Fatma Bilge Ergen; Gulsah Gulal; Adalet Elcin Yildiz; Azim Celik; Jale Karakaya; Ustun Aydingoz
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Douglas G Altman; Johannes B Reitsma; John P A Ioannidis; Petra Macaskill; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; David F Ransohoff; Gary S Collins
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers.

Authors:  Kevin K Dobbin; Richard M Simon
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Validation of asynchronous quantitative bone densitometry of the spine: Accuracy, short-term reproducibility, and a comparison with conventional quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Yongbin Su; Qianqian Wang; Yangyang Duanmu; Minghui Yang; Chen Yi; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Automatic Spine Tissue Segmentation from MRI Data Based on Cascade of Boosted Classifiers and Active Appearance Model.

Authors:  Dominik Gaweł; Paweł Główka; Tomasz Kotwicki; Michał Nowak
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  State of the art in osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment.

Authors:  J Liu; E M Curtis; C Cooper; N C Harvey
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping.

Authors:  Alex Zwanenburg; Martin Vallières; Mahmoud A Abdalah; Hugo J W L Aerts; Vincent Andrearczyk; Aditya Apte; Saeed Ashrafinia; Spyridon Bakas; Roelof J Beukinga; Ronald Boellaard; Marta Bogowicz; Luca Boldrini; Irène Buvat; Gary J R Cook; Christos Davatzikos; Adrien Depeursinge; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Nicola Dinapoli; Cuong Viet Dinh; Sebastian Echegaray; Issam El Naqa; Andriy Y Fedorov; Roberto Gatta; Robert J Gillies; Vicky Goh; Michael Götz; Matthias Guckenberger; Sung Min Ha; Mathieu Hatt; Fabian Isensee; Philippe Lambin; Stefan Leger; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Jacopo Lenkowicz; Fiona Lippert; Are Losnegård; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Olivier Morin; Henning Müller; Sandy Napel; Christophe Nioche; Fanny Orlhac; Sarthak Pati; Elisabeth A G Pfaehler; Arman Rahmim; Arvind U K Rao; Jonas Scherer; Muhammad Musib Siddique; Nanna M Sijtsema; Jairo Socarras Fernandez; Emiliano Spezi; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost; Taman Upadhaya; Vincenzo Valentini; Lisanne V van Dijk; Joost van Griethuysen; Floris H P van Velden; Philip Whybra; Christian Richter; Steffen Löck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 29.146

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.