Literature DB >> 35111320

Collaboration between adult patients and practitioners when making decisions about prescribing opioid medicines for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a scoping review.

Nirlas Shantilal Bathia1, Robyn E McAskill2, Jennie E Hancox3, Roger D Knaggs4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term opioid therapy (>12 months) is not effective for improving chronic non-cancer pain and function. Where patients are not experiencing pain relief with long-term opioids, the opioid should be tapered and discontinuation considered. Practitioners may find it challenging to tell patients experiencing pain that they are better off reducing or not taking medicines that do not help. This review aims to ascertain what is published about: (1) the interaction and (2) the nature of the relationship between practitioners and patients when prescribing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care.
METHOD: A scoping review of English-language qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method studies in databases including: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, BNI, CINALH EMCARE and HMIC. The identified papers were reviewed to provide a descriptive summary of the literature.
RESULTS: The review identified 20 studies. The studies used a range of methods including interviews, focus groups, audio and video recordings of clinical consultations, telephone survey and data from patient records. One study reported that researchers had engaged with a patient advisory group to guide their research. Patients expressed the importance of being treated as individuals, not being judged and being involved in prescribing decisions. Practitioners expressed difficulty in managing patient expectations and establishing trust. Opioid risk and practitioner suspicion shape opioid prescribing decisions. There is a paucity of literature about how precisely practitioners overcome interactional challenges and implement personalised care in practice.
CONCLUSION: The studies in this review ascertain that practitioners and patients often find it challenging to achieve shared decisions in opioid review consultations. Effective communication is essential to achieve good clinical practice. Collaborative research with PPI partners should be aimed at identifying communication practices that support practitioners to achieve shared decisions with patients when reviewing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. © The British Pain Society 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; interaction; opioid; patient; relationship

Year:  2021        PMID: 35111320      PMCID: PMC8801689          DOI: 10.1177/20494637211025560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  33 in total

1.  You Present like a Drug Addict: Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Trust and Trustworthiness in Chronic Pain Management.

Authors:  Daniel Z Buchman; Anita Ho; Judy Illes
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Patient and provider characteristics associated with communication about opioids: An observational study.

Authors:  Cleveland G Shields; Lindsay N Fuzzell; Sharon L Christ; Marianne S Matthias
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-12-03

3.  Communicating about opioids for chronic pain: a qualitative study of patient attributions and the influence of the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  M S Matthias; E E Krebs; A A Bergman; J M Coffing; M J Bair
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Amy Gravely; Sean Nugent; Agnes C Jensen; Beth DeRonne; Elizabeth S Goldsmith; Kurt Kroenke; Matthew J Bair; Siamak Noorbaloochi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Patients' Perspectives on Tapering of Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Joseph W Frank; Cari Levy; Daniel D Matlock; Susan L Calcaterra; Shane R Mueller; Stephen Koester; Ingrid A Binswanger
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Medical Record Documentation About Opioid Tapering: Examining Benefit-to-Harm Framework and Patient Engagement.

Authors:  Michele Buonora; Hector R Perez; Jordan Stumph; Robert Allen; Shadi Nahvi; Chinazo O Cunningham; Jessica S Merlin; Joanna L Starrels
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  Patients' Experience With Opioid Tapering: A Conceptual Model With Recommendations for Clinicians.

Authors:  Stephen G Henry; Debora A Paterniti; Bo Feng; Ana-Maria Iosif; Richard L Kravitz; Gary Weinberg; Penney Cowan; Susan Verba
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  'If you can't see a dilemma in this situation you should probably regard it as a warning': a metasynthesis and theoretical modelling of general practitioners' opioid prescription experiences in primary care.

Authors:  Mary-Claire Kennedy; Phoebe Pallotti; Rebecca Dickinson; Clare Harley
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2018-10-22

9.  "Those Conversations in My Experience Don't Go Well": A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Provider Experiences Tapering Long-term Opioid Medications.

Authors:  Laura C Kennedy; Ingrid A Binswanger; Shane R Mueller; Cari Levy; Daniel D Matlock; Susan L Calcaterra; Stephen Koester; Joseph W Frank
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  Voices that may not otherwise be heard: a qualitative exploration into the perspectives of primary care patients living with chronic pain.

Authors:  Lorraine S Wallace; Randell K Wexler; Leon McDougle; W Frederick Miser; J David Haddox
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.