Literature DB >> 31308941

'If you can't see a dilemma in this situation you should probably regard it as a warning': a metasynthesis and theoretical modelling of general practitioners' opioid prescription experiences in primary care.

Mary-Claire Kennedy1, Phoebe Pallotti2, Rebecca Dickinson1, Clare Harley1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prescribing of opioids has increased internationally in developed countries in recent decades within primary and secondary care. The majority of patients with chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) are managed by their general practitioner (GP). Recent qualitative studies have examined the issue of opioid prescribing for CNMP from a GP viewpoint. The aim of this study is to identify and synthesise the qualitative literature describing the factors influencing the nature and extent of opioid prescribing by GPs for patients with CNMP in primary care.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, CINAHL and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1986 to February 2018. The full text of included articles was reviewed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative research. The papers were coded by two researchers and themes organised using Thematic Network Analysis. Themes were constructed in a hierarchical manner, basic themes informed organising themes which informed global themes. A theoretical model was derived using global themes to explain the interplay between factors influencing opioid prescribing decisions.
RESULTS: From 7020 records, 21 full text papers were assessed, and 13 studies included in the synthesis; 9 were from the United States, 3 from the United Kingdom and 1 from Canada. Four global themes emerged: suspicion, risk, agreement and encompassing systems level factors. These global themes are inter-related and capture the complex decision-making processes underlying opioid prescribing whereby the physician both consciously and unconsciously quantifies the risk-benefit relationship associated with initiating or continuing an opioid prescription.
CONCLUSION: Recognising the inherent complexity of opioid prescribing and the limitations of healthcare systems is crucial to developing opioid stewardship strategies to combat the rise in opioid prescription morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; family medicine; general practitioner; opioid; prescribing metasynthesis

Year:  2018        PMID: 31308941      PMCID: PMC6613071          DOI: 10.1177/2049463718804572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  36 in total

1.  Analysis of the physician variable in pain management.

Authors:  C R Green; J R Wheeler; B Marchant; F LaPorte; E Guerrero
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  A prescription for better prescribing.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Graeme Henderson; David J Webb; Michael D Rawlins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-02

3.  Exploring beliefs and practice of opioid prescribing for persistent non-cancer pain by general practitioners.

Authors:  Kirsty Hutchinson; Annie M E Moreland; Amanda C de C Williams; John Weinman; Rob Horne
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Prevalence and characteristics of opioid use in the US adult population.

Authors:  Judith Parsells Kelly; Suzanne F Cook; David W Kaufman; Theresa Anderson; Lynn Rosenberg; Allen A Mitchell
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Underutilisation of opioids in elderly patients with chronic pain: approaches to correcting the problem.

Authors:  Kirsten Auret; Stephan A Schug
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Opioid analgesics for pain control: wisconsin physicians' knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and prescribing practices.

Authors:  Marla Z Wolfert; Aaron M Gilson; June L Dahl; James F Cleary
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 7.  Socioeconomic disadvantage and pain.

Authors:  Ellen L Poleshuck; Carmen R Green
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Opioids, chronic pain, and addiction in primary care.

Authors:  Declan T Barry; Kevin S Irwin; Emlyn S Jones; William C Becker; Jeanette M Tetrault; Lynn E Sullivan; Helena Hansen; Patrick G O'Connor; Richard S Schottenfeld; David A Fiellin
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Opioid purchases and expenditure in nine western European countries: 'are we killing off morphine?'.

Authors:  Franco De Conno; Carla Ripamonti; Cinzia Brunelli
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.762

10.  Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.

Authors:  James Thomas; Angela Harden
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  A pharmacist-led intervention to improve the management of opioids in a general practice: a qualitative evaluation of participant interviews.

Authors:  Margaret Jordan; Meredith Young-Whitford; Judy Mullan; Adele Stewart; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-11-09

2.  Collaboration between adult patients and practitioners when making decisions about prescribing opioid medicines for chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Nirlas Shantilal Bathia; Robyn E McAskill; Jennie E Hancox; Roger D Knaggs
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2021-06-23

3.  General practitioners' attitudes towards opioids for non-cancer pain: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Rani Punwasi; L de Kleijn; J B M Rijkels-Otters; M Veen; Alessandro Chiarotto; Bart Koes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.