Literature DB >> 35111317

What is the content of virtually delivered pain management programmes for people with persistent musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review.

Gregory Booth1, Deborah Williams1, Hasina Patel1, Anthony W Gilbert1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Virtual consultations (VC) have been embraced by healthcare organisations during the COVID-19 pandemic. VC allows continuation of patient care while adhering to government advised restrictions and social distancing measures. Multidisciplinary pain management programmes (PMPs) are a core element of many pain services and utilising virtual methods to deliver PMPs has allowed them to continue to provide care. This systematic review aimed to explore the content of existing virtually delivered PMPs and discuss if and how these findings can be used to guide clinical delivery.
METHODS: Eligible studies included adults (aged ⩾18 years) with persistent musculoskeletal pain and any virtually delivered intervention that was described as a PMP or that had components of PMPs. Databases were searched from inception until July 2020. We performed a content analysis comparing existing interventions with established evidence-based clinical guidelines published by the British Pain Society (BPS). Intervention reporting quality was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist: an established checklist developed to improve the completeness of the reporting of interventions.
RESULTS: Eight studies were included. One intervention included six of the seven components recommended by the BPS; none included all seven. 'Skills training and activity management' was present in all eight interventions; 'education' and 'cognitive therapy methods' were present in six interventions; 'graded activation' and 'methods to enhance acceptance, mindfulness and psychological flexibility' were present in four interventions; 'physical exercise' was present in two interventions and 'graded exposure' was present in one intervention. None of the studies described all 12 items of the TIDieR checklist adequately enough for replication.
CONCLUSION: Published virtual PMPs partially meet established clinical guidelines. Future virtual PMPs should be based on evidence-based clinical guidelines, and more research is needed to explore the effectiveness of virtually delivered PMPs and each recommended component. © The British Pain Society 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; chronic pain; pain management programme; persistent pain; rehabilitation; virtual consultations

Year:  2021        PMID: 35111317      PMCID: PMC8801687          DOI: 10.1177/20494637211023074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  41 in total

Review 1.  Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  M M Veehof; H R Trompetter; E T Bohlmeijer; K M G Schreurs
Journal:  Cogn Behav Ther       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 2.  The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Serge Perrot; Milton Cohen; Antonia Barke; Beatrice Korwisi; Winfried Rief; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Role of kinesiophobia on pain, disability and quality of life in people suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alejandro Luque-Suarez; Javier Martinez-Calderon; Deborah Falla
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.

Authors:  Tammy C Hoffmann; Paul P Glasziou; Isabelle Boutron; Ruairidh Milne; Rafael Perera; David Moher; Douglas G Altman; Virginia Barbour; Helen Macdonald; Marie Johnston; Sarah E Lamb; Mary Dixon-Woods; Peter McCulloch; Jeremy C Wyatt; An-Wen Chan; Susan Michie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-07

5.  Telemedicine delivery of patient education in remote Ontario communities: feasibility of an Advanced Clinician Practitioner in Arthritis Care (ACPAC)-led inflammatory arthritis education program.

Authors:  Kelly Warmington; Carol Flewelling; Carol A Kennedy; Rachel Shupak; Angelo Papachristos; Caroline Jones; Denise Linton; Dorcas E Beaton; Sydney Lineker
Journal:  Open Access Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02-24

6.  Rapid implementation of virtual clinics due to COVID-19: report and early evaluation of a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Anthony William Gilbert; Joe C T Billany; Ruth Adam; Luke Martin; Rebecca Tobin; Shiv Bagdai; Noreen Galvin; Ian Farr; Adam Allain; Lucy Davies; John Bateson
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-05

7.  Effectiveness of telephone-based interventions for managing osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kate M O'Brien; Rebecca K Hodder; John Wiggers; Amanda Williams; Elizabeth Campbell; Luke Wolfenden; Sze Lin Yoong; Flora Tzelepis; Steven J Kamper; Christopher M Williams
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Comparison of the accuracy of telehealth examination versus clinical examination in the detection of shoulder pathology.

Authors:  Kendall E Bradley; Chad Cook; Emily K Reinke; Emily N Vinson; Richard C Mather; Jonathan Riboh; Tally Lassiter; Jocelyn R Wittstein
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Pain management programmes via video conferencing: a rapid review.

Authors:  Jackie Walumbe; Joletta Belton; Diarmuid Denneny
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2020-10-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid design and implementation of a virtual pain management programme due to COVID-19: a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Deborah Williams; Gregory Booth; Helen Cohen; Anthony Gilbert; Andrew Lucas; Chloe Mitchell; Gayatri Mittal; Hasina Patel; Tamsin Peters; Mia Phillips; Will Rudge; Roxaneh Zarnegar
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2021-09-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.