Literature DB >> 3511081

An alternative in terminal care: results of the National Hospice Study.

D S Greer, V Mor, J N Morris, S Sherwood, D Kidder, H Birnbaum.   

Abstract

Hospice is a program of supportive services for terminally ill patients and their families, provided either at home or in designated inpatient settings, which is purported to improve patient and family quality of life at lower cost than conventional terminal care. The National Hospice Study was a multi-site, quasi-experimental study to compare the experiences of terminal cancer patients and their families in hospices with those of similar patients and families receiving conventional terminal care. The results indicate that, although care is different in hospices, e.g. lesser utilization of aggressive interventional therapy and diagnostic testing, patients' quality of life is similar in the hospice and conventional care systems with the exception of pain and symptom control, which may be better in the inpatient hospice setting. Hospice patients are more likely to die at home and their families are satisfied with that outcome. Otherwise, no consistent superiority of family outcome was associated with the hospice approach. The cost of hospice care is less than that of conventional terminal care for patients in hospices without inpatient facilities, but the cost of hospice appears to be equivalent to conventional care for patients in hospices having beds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; National Hospice Study

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3511081     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90103-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  33 in total

1.  Evidence based palliative care. There is some evidence-and there needs to be more.

Authors:  I J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-21

2.  The lack of effect of market structure on hospice use.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Virginia W Chang; James X Zhang; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Strengthening research to improve the practice and management of long-term care.

Authors:  Penny Hollander Feldman; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Predictors of home care expenditures and death at home for cancer patients in an integrated comprehensive palliative home care pilot program.

Authors:  Doris M Howell; Tom Abernathy; Rhonda Cockerill; Kevin Brazil; Frank Wagner; Larry Librach
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-02

5.  Terminal care at home.

Authors:  B D Amesbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The effects of hospice coverage on Medicare expenditures.

Authors:  D Kidder
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  End-of-life care in Medicare beneficiaries dying with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kristin M Sheffield; Casey A Boyd; Jamie Benarroch-Gampel; Yong-Fang Kuo; Catherine D Cooksley; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Medicare use in the last ninety days of life.

Authors:  G L Gaumer; J Stavins
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Effectiveness of home care programmes for patients with incurable cancer on their quality of life and time spent in hospital: systematic review.

Authors:  F W Smeenk; J C van Haastregt; L P de Witte; H F Crebolder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27

10.  Race and residence: intercounty variation in black-white differences in hospice use.

Authors:  Kimberly S Johnson; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; Richard Payne; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.