Kimberly S Johnson1, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Richard Payne, James A Tulsky. 1. Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA; Division of Geriatrics, Duke University, Durham, USA; Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, USA; Center for Palliative Care, Duke University, Durham, USA; Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: johns196@mc.duke.edu.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although blacks use hospice at lower rates than whites in the U.S., racial differences in hospice use vary by geographic area. OBJECTIVES: To describe intercounty variability in black-white differences in hospice use and the association with the supply of health care resources. METHODS: Subjects were a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries in North and South Carolina who died in 2008. Using Wilcoxon tests and logistic regression, we examined the differences in the supply of health care resources (hospital beds and physicians per population age 65 years and older, percentage of generalists, etc.) between counties with and without racial disparity in hospice use. Counties with a racial disparity had significantly (P < 0.05) higher rates of hospice use among whites than blacks. RESULTS: Of 76,283 decedents in 128 counties, 19.78% were black. In the 39 counties (30.47%) with racial disparity in hospice use, the mean proportion of whites who enrolled in hospice was 41.3% vs. 28.66% of blacks (P < 0.0001). Counties with more hospital beds per population age 65 years and older had a higher odds (OR, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.86) and those with a larger proportion of generalists had a lower odds (OR, 0.01; 95% CI 0.001-0.476) of having a racial disparity in hospice use. CONCLUSION: In most counties, the rates of hospice use were similar for blacks and whites. In counties with a racial disparity, there were more resources to deliver aggressive care (i.e., hospital beds and specialists). Because of a greater preference for life-sustaining therapies, blacks may be more likely to use acute care services at the end of life when resources for the delivery of these services are readily available.
CONTEXT: Although blacks use hospice at lower rates than whites in the U.S., racial differences in hospice use vary by geographic area. OBJECTIVES: To describe intercounty variability in black-white differences in hospice use and the association with the supply of health care resources. METHODS: Subjects were a retrospective cohort of Medicare beneficiaries in North and South Carolina who died in 2008. Using Wilcoxon tests and logistic regression, we examined the differences in the supply of health care resources (hospital beds and physicians per population age 65 years and older, percentage of generalists, etc.) between counties with and without racial disparity in hospice use. Counties with a racial disparity had significantly (P < 0.05) higher rates of hospice use among whites than blacks. RESULTS: Of 76,283 decedents in 128 counties, 19.78% were black. In the 39 counties (30.47%) with racial disparity in hospice use, the mean proportion of whites who enrolled in hospice was 41.3% vs. 28.66% of blacks (P < 0.0001). Counties with more hospital beds per population age 65 years and older had a higher odds (OR, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.86) and those with a larger proportion of generalists had a lower odds (OR, 0.01; 95% CI 0.001-0.476) of having a racial disparity in hospice use. CONCLUSION: In most counties, the rates of hospice use were similar for blacks and whites. In counties with a racial disparity, there were more resources to deliver aggressive care (i.e., hospital beds and specialists). Because of a greater preference for life-sustaining therapies, blacks may be more likely to use acute care services at the end of life when resources for the delivery of these services are readily available.
Authors: Joan M Teno; Brian R Clarridge; Virginia Casey; Lisa C Welch; Terrie Wetle; Renee Shield; Vincent Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Brystana G Kaufman; David Klemish; Andrew Olson; Cordt T Kassner; Jerome P Reiter; Matthew Harker; Laura Sheble; Benjamin A Goldstein; Donald H Taylor; Nrupen A Bhavsar Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ramona L Rhodes; Bryan Elwood; Simon C Lee; Jasmin A Tiro; Ethan A Halm; Celette S Skinner Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2016-02-14 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Winnie Y Zou; Hashem B El-Serag; Yvonne H Sada; Sarah L Temple; Shubhada Sansgiry; Fasiha Kanwal; Jessica A Davila Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Katherine A Ornstein; Melissa D Aldridge; Christine A Mair; Rebecca Gorges; Albert L Siu; Amy S Kelley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Kathryn L Burgio; Beverly R Williams; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; David T Redden; Hyunjin Noh; Patricia S Goode; Elizabeth Kvale; Marie Bakitas; F Amos Bailey Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Channing E Tate; Grace Venechuk; Elinor J Brereton; Pilar Ingle; Larry A Allen; Megan A Morris; Daniel D Matlock Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Marie Bakitas; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Salpy V Pamboukian; Jose Tallaj; Elizabeth Kvale; Keith M Swetz; Jennifer Frost; Rachel Wells; Andres Azuero; Konda Keebler; Imatullah Akyar; Deborah Ejem; Karen Steinhauser; Tasha Smith; Raegan Durant; Alan T Kono Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 3.234