Literature DB >> 35110256

Association Between Cystic Fibrosis Severity Markers and CFTR Genotypes in Turkish Children.

Abdurrahman Erdem Başaran1, Ayşen Başaran2, Dilara Fatma Kocacik Uygun3, Elanur Yılmaz4, Asef Moballegh4, Latife Öz5, Özgül Alper4, Ayşen Bingöl1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare class I/II cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations to class III-V mutations with regards to cystic fibrosis disease severity markers in children.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was designed as a cross-sectional study in Antalya province, located on the south coast of Turkey. The study included 38 cystic fibrosis patients aged between 0.6 and 18 years. The CFTR genotype of the patients was categorized into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of class I or class II mutations in any of the alleles. Group I comprised 8 homozygous, 8 with unknown alleles, and 8 compound heterozygous patients, and group II comprised 11 homozygous and 3 compound heterozygous patients. The groups were analyzed in respect of cystic fibrosis disease severity markers, such as spirometry, ShwachmanKulczycki score, body mass index (BMI), sweat chloride concentration, chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, annual exacerbation frequency, and severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization during the previous year.
RESULTS: In the comparison of group I and group II patients, a significant difference was observed in pancreas insufficiency (83.3% vs. 35.7%; P = .005), chronic P. aeruginosa infection (58.3% vs. 7.1%; P = .002), cough severity score (1.7 ± 1.1 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5; P = .029), number of severe exacerbations requiring hospitalization during the previous year (0.9 ± 1 vs. 0.3 ± 0.8; P = .03), and sweat chloride levels (76.7 ± 15.2 vs. 61 ± 22.3; P = .02). All these values were higher in group I patients. The mean BMI values (15.8 ± 2.2 vs. 17.6 ± 2.8; P = .03) were lower in group I patients.
CONCLUSION: There seems to be a difference between class I/II CFTR mutations and class III-V mutations on the severity of the disease in cystic fibrosis patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35110256      PMCID: PMC8975339          DOI: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Thorac J        ISSN: 2148-7197


  31 in total

1.  Type of CFTR mutation determines risk of pancreatitis in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Chee Y Ooi; Ruslan Dorfman; Marco Cipolli; Tanja Gonska; Carlo Castellani; Katherine Keenan; Steven D Freedman; Julian Zielenski; Yves Berthiaume; Mary Corey; Susanne Schibli; Elizabeth Tullis; Peter R Durie
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Combination of ENaC and CFTR mutations may predispose to cystic fibrosis-like disease.

Authors:  I Fajac; M Viel; N Gaitch; D Hubert; T Bienvenu
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 3.  Cystic fibrosis: a worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations--correlation with incidence data and application to screening.

Authors:  Joseph L Bobadilla; Milan Macek; Jason P Fine; Philip M Farrell
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection definition: EuroCareCF Working Group report.

Authors:  T Pressler; C Bohmova; S Conway; S Dumcius; L Hjelte; N Høiby; H Kollberg; B Tümmler; V Vavrova
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Relative contribution of genetic and nongenetic modifiers to intestinal obstruction in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Scott M Blackman; Rebecca Deering-Brose; Rita McWilliams; Kathleen Naughton; Barbara Coleman; Teresa Lai; Marilyn Algire; Suzanne Beck; Julie Hoover-Fong; Ada Hamosh; M Daniele Fallin; Kristen West; Dan E Arking; Aravinda Chakravarti; David J Cutler; Garry R Cutting
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Longitudinal analysis of pulmonary function decline in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  M Corey; L Edwards; H Levison; M Knowles
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Prediction of acute pancreatitis risk based on PIP score in children with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  V Terlizzi; A Tosco; R Tomaiuolo; A Sepe; N Amato; A Casale; C Mercogliano; F De Gregorio; F Improta; A Elce; G Castaldo; V Raia
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Cystic fibrosis: genotypic and phenotypic variations.

Authors:  J Zielenski; L C Tsui
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 9.  A new era in the treatment of cystic fibrosis: correction of the underlying CFTR defect.

Authors:  Michael P Boyle; Kris De Boeck
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Applying whole-genome sequencing in relation to phenotype and outcomes in siblings with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilk; Andrew T Braun; Philip M Farrell; Anita Laxova; Donna M Brown; James M Holt; Camille L Birch; Nadiya Sosonkina; Brandon M Wilk; Elizabeth A Worthey
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2020-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.