Literature DB >> 35110129

Acquired Lymphangioma Circumscriptum Post-neonatal Circumcision.

Jad A Degheili1, Tag Keun Yoo2, Sara Trincao-Batra3, Jun Ho Lee2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35110129      PMCID: PMC8849619          DOI: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr        ISSN: 2757-6256


× No keyword cloud information.
A 9-year-old boy presented from the rural countryside to the urology outpatient department with a chief complaint of genital edema and multiple painless blisters, occasionally rupturing and draining clear fluid (Figure 1). At 20 days of age, he underwent an uncomplicated circumcision. Two weeks later, the parents noticed penile and scrotal edema, with protruding vesicles from the perineal and scrotal skin. Seen by several local dermatologists during all this period, he was treated on several occasions, with liquid nitrogen for the vesicles and Molutrex solution, supposedly treating molluscum contagiosum. Minimal improvement was noted.
Figure 1. a, b.

Gross image of the patient’s genitalia. (a) Presence of translucent vesicles at the penoscrotal junction and significant edema of the penile shaft and scrotum. (b) Few more of those vesicles seen at the scrotum and the perineal area (arrows), resembling a frog spawn.

Upon presentation, a testicular ultrasound showed normal-sized testicles, the right side measuring 20 × 13 mm, and the left-sided testicle measuring 19 × 14 mm. No inter-parenchymal masses or nodes were visible. Bilateral moderate-sized hydroceles were noted. An ultrasound of the abdomen showed normal-sized kidneys, with no ascites or any other intra-abdominal lesions. To better characterize the extent of the external genitalia’s edema and to identify any soft tissue abnormalities, an unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis was performed. Soft tissue edema was noted within the scrotum, penile shaft, and perineal area, along with noted vesicles (Figure 2). Bilateral moderate hydroceles were also noted. Based on the clinical picture and radiological images, a preliminary diagnosis of lymphangioma circumscriptum (LC) was made. A reconstructive surgery was offered as an option with the possibility of recurrence, but the family declined at this point.
Figure 2. a-c.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis. (A) Pelvic MRI shows significant edema of the penis and the scrotum, along with bilateral hydroceles. (B&C) Evident fluid-filled vesicles on the scrotal skin and the perineal area (arrows).

LC is a rare superficial cutaneous lymphatic malformation, presenting at birth or acquired later in life, secondary to infection, surgery, or radiation.[1] The fact that our patient underwent a circumcision, despite no records for how extensive the procedure was or any possible complications, could have impacted the normal lymphatic drainage of the tissues, within the groin area, leading to an acquired form of LC, despite patient’s young age. Initially, Fox and Fox[2] in 1878 highlighted the cause of LC as deep subcutaneous lymphatic cisterns that are not connected to the lymphatic system. Upon contraction, a back pressure occurs; thus transmitted to the epidermis, resulting in translucent vesicles resembling a frog spawn.[3] LC involves the thighs, buttocks, groin, and axilla; rarely involving the genitalia such as the scrotum.[4,5] Infectious etiologies such as molluscum contagiosum, filariasis, and condylomata accuminata must be ruled out.[1] LC is generally a benign disease, but reports of lymphangiosarcoma and malignant transformation to squamous cell carcinoma have been reported in a long-standing history of LC.[3] The differential diagnosis for LC is wide, and each must be ruled out clinically and sometimes with the utility of histopathological biopsies. These include dermatitis herpetiformis, herpes zoster, lymphangiectasia, and various dermatological manifestations of herpes simplex, metastatic malignancies, such as melanoma, and neurofibromatosis type I, among few others.[6] Although less invasive treatment modalities such as cryotherapy, sclerotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation are utilized, surgical resection of the deep lymphatic cisterns represents the only definitive cure.[7] Kumar et al.[5] presented the first case of penoscrotal LC, acquired four months following circumcision. This was treated with excessive surgical resection, followed by raising flaps and a split-thickness skin graft. A potential cause for acquired LC, postcircumcision, could be secondary to manhandling of tissues; yet the exact pathophysiology remains indeterminate.[5] Failure of adequate excision leads to recurrence in 25-50% of cases, within 3 months.[4]
  5 in total

1.  Lymphangioma circumscriptum.

Authors:  J Mordehai; E Kurzbart; D Shinhar; A Sagi; R Finaly; A J Mares
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Penoscrotal lymphangioma circumscriptum following circumcision.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Ankur Mittal; Abhishek Chandna
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-09-01

3.  Lymphangioma circumscriptum in the scrotum: a case report.

Authors:  Saroona Haroon; Sheema H Hasan
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-09

4.  Treatment options of lymphangioma circumscriptum.

Authors:  Neerja Puri
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

5.  Lymphangioma circumscriptum of the male genitalia.

Authors:  Ganesh Avhad; Hemangi Jerajani
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.