Literature DB >> 35107345

In Vivo Delivery of M0, M1, and M2 Macrophage Subtypes via Genipin-Cross-Linked Collagen Biotextile.

Ilaha Isali1, Phillip McClellan2, Thomas R Wong1, Snigdha Cingireddi1, Mukesh Jain3, James M Anderson4,5, Adonis Hijaz1, Ozan Akkus2,5,6.   

Abstract

Developing strategies to regulate the immune response poses significant challenges with respect to the clinical translation of tissue-engineered scaffolds. Prominent advancements have been made relating to macrophage-based therapies and biomaterials. Macrophages exhibit the potential to influence healing trajectory, and predominance of particular subtypes during early onset of healing influences repair outcomes. This study evaluated short- and long-term healing response and postoperative mechanical properties of genipin-cross-linked, electrochemically aligned collagen biotextiles with comparative administration of M0, M1, and M2 subtypes. Irrespective of macrophage subtype seeded, all the groups demonstrated existence of M2 macrophages at both time points as typified by arginase and Ym-1 expressions, and distinct absence of M1 macrophages, as indicated by lack of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and interleukin-1β expression in all the groups for both time points. M2 macrophage-seeded collagen biotextiles revealed promising host tissue responses, such as reduced fibrous capsule thickness and minimal granulation tissue formation. Furthermore, the M2-seeded group displayed more abundant interstitial collagen deposition following degradation of the collagen threads. M2 macrophage supplementation improved structural and mechanical properties at the tissue and cellular level as indicated by increased modulus and stiffness. This study demonstrates improved biomechanical and histological outcomes following incorporation of M2 macrophages into genipin-cross-linked collagen biotextiles for tissue repair and offers future strategies focused on connective tissue regeneration. Impact statement Macrophages exhibit significant plasticity with complex phenotypes ranging from proinflammatory (M1) to proregenerative (M2). They release cytokines and chemokines governing immunological stability, inflammation resolution, and tissue healing and regeneration. However, utilization of macrophages as therapeutic tools for tissue engineering remains limited. In this study, genipin-cross-linked collagen biotextiles were employed to deliver M0, M1, and M2 macrophages and evaluate tissue responses and postsurgical mechanical properties in vivo. M2-seeded collagen biotextiles showed reduced fibrous capsule and favorable healing response. These outcomes shed new light on designing tissue-engineered constructs that offer a novel cell-based therapeutic approach for applications requiring structural augmentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  M1/M2; collagen; genipin; macrophages; tissue regeneration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35107345      PMCID: PMC9469745          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2021.0203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   4.080


  37 in total

1.  Interleukin-4 Receptor α Signaling in Myeloid Cells Controls Collagen Fibril Assembly in Skin Repair.

Authors:  Johanna A Knipper; Sebastian Willenborg; Jürgen Brinckmann; Wilhelm Bloch; Tobias Maaß; Raimund Wagener; Thomas Krieg; Tara Sutherland; Ariel Munitz; Marc E Rothenberg; Anja Niehoff; Rebecca Richardson; Matthias Hammerschmidt; Judith E Allen; Sabine A Eming
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 2.  Macrophage M1/M2 polarization.

Authors:  Chen Yunna; Hu Mengru; Wang Lei; Chen Weidong
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Macrophage activation and skeletal muscle healing following traumatic injury.

Authors:  Margaret L Novak; Eileen M Weinheimer-Haus; Timothy J Koh
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  New concepts of IL-10-induced lung fibrosis: fibrocyte recruitment and M2 activation in a CCL2/CCR2 axis.

Authors:  Lei Sun; Marisa C Louie; Kevin M Vannella; Carol A Wilke; Ann Marie LeVine; Bethany B Moore; Thomas P Shanley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.464

5.  In vivo response to electrochemically aligned collagen bioscaffolds.

Authors:  Vipuil Kishore; Jorge Alfredo Uquillas; Alexandra Dubikovsky; Musa A Alshehabat; Paul W Snyder; Gert J Breur; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 6.  Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation.

Authors:  David M Mosser; Justin P Edwards
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  The effect of microgeometry, implant thickness and polyurethane chemistry on the foreign body response to subcutaneous implants.

Authors:  W Kenneth Ward; Emily P Slobodzian; Kenneth L Tiekotter; Michael D Wood
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Soft apoptotic-cell-inspired nanoparticles persistently bind to macrophage membranes and promote anti-inflammatory and pro-healing effects.

Authors:  Guanglin Zhang; Haoyu Xue; Dazheng Sun; Shenyu Yang; Mei Tu; Rong Zeng
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 9.  Role of Human Macrophage Polarization in Inflammation during Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Chiraz Atri; Fatma Z Guerfali; Dhafer Laouini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Macrophages During the Fibrotic Process: M2 as Friend and Foe.

Authors:  Tarcio Teodoro Braga; Juan Sebastian Henao Agudelo; Niels Olsen Saraiva Camara
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.