Literature DB >> 35106184

The Impact of Race and Geographical Location on the Treatment Options of Cervical Cancer in Black and White Women Living in the State of Alabama.

Oyoyo Egiebor-Aiwan1, Isra Elhussin2, David Nganwa3, Ronald Peaster4, Crystal M James5, John Heath5, Lecarde Webb6, Ehsan Abdalla5.   

Abstract

This study assesses the association between age, race, geographical-location, stage, and treatments of Cervical Cancer (CerCancer) in Black and White women, living in Alabama. Data from 2004-2013 was provided by the Alabama Cancer Registry. To perform Chi-square and logistic regression tests, SAS-software was used for analysis. In urban counties, Blacks 40-49 years old diagnosed with localized stage of CerCancer were the most likely to receive surgery (74.14%; P < .0001), followed by Whites 17-39 years old diagnosed with regional stage, were the most likely to receive radiation and surgery-radiation sequence (66.32 and 66.67%; P < .0001) respectively. Also, Whites 50 years and older diagnosed with regional stage were the most likely to receive chemotherapy (65.87%; P < .0001). In rural counties, Blacks 40-49 years old diagnosed with regional stage were the most likely to receive radiation (70.37%) and chemotherapy (83.33%) with P = .005 and .003 respectively, followed by Whites 17-39 years old diagnosed with localized stage were the most likely to receive surgery (76.81%; P < .0001). Adjusting for age, stage and county, Blacks had 1.12 (95% CI = .88-1.42) times the odds of receiving more radiation treatment. Blacks had .76 times adjusted odds (95% CI .59-.99) of receiving less surgery compared to Whites. Treatment disparities exist between Blacks and Whites in Alabama.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blacks; Cervical cancer; SAS software; Urban and rural counties of Alabama; Whites; disparities

Year:  2020        PMID: 35106184      PMCID: PMC8802871     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Sci Humanit        ISSN: 2159-8800


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cervical cancer: disparities in screening, treatment, and survival.

Authors:  Elizabeth I O Garner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Geetanjali D Datta; Graham A Colditz; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Racial disparities in cervical cancer survival over time.

Authors:  J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Joel T Clemmer; Leslie S Bradford; Rachel M Clark; Whitfield B Growdon; Annekathryn Goodman; David M Boruta; John O Schorge; Marcela G del Carmen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Age-specific trends in black-white disparities in cervical cancer incidence in the United States: 1975-2009.

Authors:  Edgar P Simard; Deepa Naishadham; Debbie Saslow; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Equal care ensures equal survival for African-American women with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Farley; J F Hines; R R Taylor; J W Carlson; M F Parker; E R Kost; S J Rogers; T A Harrison; C I Macri; G P Parham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Ethnic differences in patterns of care of stage 1A(1) and stage 1A(2) cervical cancer: a SEER database study.

Authors:  M G del Carmen; F J Montz; R E Bristow; A Bovicelli; T Cornelison; E Trimble
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  United States Life Tables, 2014.

Authors:  Elizabeth Arias; Melonie Heron; Jiaquan Xu
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2017-08

8.  Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2013.

Authors:  Carol DeSantis; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

Authors:  S W Chang; K Kerlikowske; A Nápoles-Springer; S F Posner; E A Sickles; E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Black and white women in Maryland receive different treatment for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Saroj Fleming; Nicholas H Schluterman; J Katthleen Tracy; Sarah M Temkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.