| Literature DB >> 35102211 |
Mehdi Asadollahzadeh1, Rezvan Torkaman2, Meisam Torab-Mostaedi2, Mojtaba Saremi3.
Abstract
The current study focuses on the recovery of zinc ions by solvent extraction in the pulsed contactor. The Zn(II) ions from chloride solution were extracted into the organic phase containing di-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (D2EHPA) extractant. The resulting data were characterized for the relative amount of (a) pulsed and no-pulsed condition; and (b) flow rate of both phases. Based on the mass balance equations for the column performance description, numerical computations of mass transfer in a disc-donut column were conducted and validated the experimental data for zinc extraction. Four different models, such as plug flow, backflow, axial dispersion, and forward mixing were evaluated in this study. The results showed that the intensification of the process with the pulsed condition increased and achieved higher mass transfer rates. The forward mixing model findings based on the curve fitting approach validated well with the experimental data. The results showed that an increase in pulsation intensity, as well as the phase flow rates, have a positive impact on the performance of the extractor. In contrast, the enhancement of flow rate led to the reduction of the described model parameters for the adverse phase.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35102211 PMCID: PMC8804020 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05710-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mass balance equations for four models[31].
| Model | Governing equations | Remarks | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFM | Continuous phase mass balance | The assumptions of this model are pure plug flow, no axial mixing, equal diameter, velocity, residence time and mass transfer rate for all droplets, the constant of mass transfer coefficient for all droplets, no breakage and coalescence of drops | |
| Dispersed phase mass balance | |||
| Boundary Conditions at top of column (z = 0) | |||
| Boundary Conditions at bottem of column (z = H) | |||
| BFM | Continuous phase mass balance | The assumptions of this model are pure plug flow with axial mixing, an axial mixing with backflow coefficients of α and β, equal values for diameter, velocity, residence time and mass transfer rate of droplets, no breakage and coalescence of drops | |
| Dispersed phase mass balance | |||
| Boundary Conditions at top of column (z = 0) | |||
| Boundary Conditions at bottem of column (z = H) | |||
| ADM | Continuous phase mass balance | The assumptions of this model are pure plug flow with axial mixing, a diffusion process with the constant diffusion coefficients of Ec and Ed, equal values for diameter, velocity, residence time and mass transfer rate of droplets, no breakage and coalescence of drops | |
| Dispersed phase mass balance | |||
| Boundary Conditions at top of column (z = 0) | |||
| Boundary Conditions at bottem of column (z = H) | |||
| FMM | Continuous phase mass balance | The main assumptions of this model are the constant values of inlet and outlet flow rates, the use of the axial dispersion coefficient (Ec) for the deviation of the continuous phase from the plug state, no coalescence and breakage of dispersed phase droplets | |
| Dispersed phase mass balance | |||
| Boundary Conditions at top of column (z = 0) | |||
| Boundary Conditions at bottem of column (z = H) | |||
| Dynamic drop size distribution | |||
| Drop velocity | |||
| Volumetric drop size distribution | |||
| Drop specific surface area | |||
| Drop holdup |
Figure 1Mass balance over a volumetric element based on the plug flow, back-flow, axial dispersion and forward mixing models.
Characteristics of chemical system used in the pilot-plant column.
| Phases | Solute | ρc (kg/m3) | ρd (kg/m3) | μc (10−3 kg/m s) | μd (10−3 kg/m s) | Σ (10−3 N/m) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| continuous | Dispersed | ||||||
| Aqueous nitrate solution of Zn(II) | D2EHPA extractant diluted in kerosene | Zinc ions | 1011 | 824 | 0.975 | 1.615 | 18.7 |
Figure 2Schematic view of a pilot plant pulsed disc-donut column.
Comparison of the AARE values between PFM, BFM, ADM, and FMM models.
| Conditions | PFM | BFM | ADM | FMM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAREX (%) | AAREY (%) | AAREX (%) | AAREY (%) | AAREX (%) | AAREY (%) | AAREX (%) | AAREY (%) | |
| Without pulsation | 10.93 | 38.63 | 5.76 | 22.35 | 3.92 | 11.37 | 2.38 | 7.87 |
| With pulsation | 13.66 | 22.48 | 11.44 | 17.12 | 12.88 | 16.37 | 10.74 | 13.28 |
Figure 3Comparison of laboratory concentration profiles with predicted by the forward mixing model under Qc = Qd = 28 (L/h) and (a) without pulsation, (b) Af = 3.4 (cm/s).
Figure 4Comparison of laboratory concentration profiles with predicted by the forward mixing model under Qd = 28 (L/h) and Af = 3.4 (cm/s) and (a) Qc = 18 and (b) Qc = 38 (L/h).
Figure 5The effect of operating parameters [(a) pulsation intensity, (b) aqueous phase flow rate, and (c) organic phase flow rate] on the continuous phase backflow coefficient.
Figure 6The effect of operating parameters [(a) pulsation intensity, (b) aqueous phase flow rate, and (c) organic phase flow rate] on the dispersed phase backflow coefficient.
Figure 7The effect of pulsation intensity on the continuous phase axial dispersion coefficient.
Figure 8The effect of aqueous phase flow rate on the continuous phase axial dispersion coefficient (a) without pulsation, (b) Af = 3.4 (cm/s).
Figure 9The effect of organic phase flow rate on the continuous phase axial dispersion coefficient (a) without pulsation, (b) Af = 3.4 (cm/s).
Figure 10The effect of operating parameters [(a) pulsation intensity, (b) aqueous phase flow rate, and (c) organic phase flow rate] on the dispersed phase axial dispersion coefficient.
Figure 11The effect of operating parameters [(a) pulsation intensity, (b) aqueous phase flow rate, and (c) organic phase flow rate] on the volumetric overall mass transfer coefficient predicted by FMM.
Figure 12The influence of aqueous and organic phase flow rate on the extraction percentage.