| Literature DB >> 35102183 |
Anika M Toorie1, Fair M Vassoler1, Fangfang Qu2, Donna Slonim2, Christopher M Schonhoff1, Elizabeth M Byrnes3.
Abstract
Adolescence represents a period of significant neurodevelopment during which adverse experiences can lead to prolonged effects on disease vulnerability, including effects that can impact future offspring. Adolescence is a common period for the initiation of drug use, including the use of opioids. Beyond effects on central reward, opioids also impact glucose metabolism, which can impact the risk of diabetes. Moreover, recent animal models suggest that the effects of adolescent opioids can effect glucose metabolism in future offspring. Indeed, we demonstrated that the adult male offspring of females exposed to morphine for 10 days during adolescence (referred to as MORF1 males) are predisposed to the adverse effects of an obesogenic diet. As adults, MORF1 males fed a high fat moderate sucrose diet (FSD) for just 6 weeks had increased fasting glucose and insulin levels when compared to age-matched offspring of females exposed to saline during adolescence (SALF1 males). Clinically, a similar profile of impaired fasting glucose has been associated with hepatic insulin resistance and an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Thus, in the current study, we used RNA sequencing to determine whether adult MORF1 males demonstrate significant alterations in the hepatic transcriptome suggestive of alterations in metabolism. Age-matched SALF1 and MORF1 males were fed either FSD or control diet (CD) for 8 weeks. Similar to our previous observations, FSD-maintained MORF1 males gained more weight and displayed both fasting hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia when compared to FSD-maintained SALF1 males, with no significant effect on glucagon. No differences in bodyweight or fasting-induce glucose were observed in control diet (CD)-maintained F1 males, although there was a trend for CD MORF1 males to display elevated levels of fasting insulin. Unexpectedly, transcriptional analyses revealed profound differences in the hepatic transcriptome of CD-maintained MORF1 and SALF1 (1686 differentially expressed genes) with no significant differences between FSD-maintained MORF1 and SALF1 males. As changes in the hepatic transcriptome were not revealed under 8 weeks FSD conditions, we extended the feeding paradigm and conducted a glucose tolerance test to determine whether impaired fasting glucose observed in FSD MORF1 males was due to peripheral insulin resistance. Impaired glucose tolerance was observed in both CD and FSD MORF1 males, and to a more limited extent in FSD SALF1 males. These findings implicate intergenerational effects of adolescent morphine exposure on the risk of developing insulin resistance and associated comorbidities, even in the absence of an obesogenic diet.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35102183 PMCID: PMC8803846 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05528-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic of experimental design.
Figure 2Panel (A): Mean (± SEM) bodyweight after 8 weeks on diet; N = 9/group. Panel (B): Mean (± SEM) food consumption in kilocalories over a 24 h period after 8 weeks on diet; N = 9/group Panel (C): Mean (± SEM) blood glucose following a 24 h fast; N = 9 for all groups but SALF1 FSD with N = 8 due to removal of statistical outlier; *p < 0.05 as compared to SALF1 FSD.
Figure 3Panel (A): Mean (± SEM) plasma insulin levels (ng/ml) following a 24 h fast; SALF1 CD N = 6; SALF1 FSD N = 5; MORF1 CD N = 5; MORF1 FSD N = 6; *p < 0.05 as compared to SALF1 FSD. Panel (B): Mean (± SEM) plasma glucagon levels (pg/ml) following a 24 h fast; SALF1 CD N = 8; SALF1 FSD N = 9; MORF1 CD N = 6; MORF1 FSD N = 8.
Figure 4Panel (A): MDS Plot comparing all groups. Panel (B): Volcano plot of significant differential gene expression when comparing CD maintained MORF1 and SALF1 males. Panel (C): V Volcano plot of significant differential gene expression when comparing FSD maintained SALF1 and CD maintained SALF1 males. Panels (A–C) N = 6/group. Relative expression of Gnα12 (top) and Plekhh2 (bottom) in punch biopsies of liver samples taken after a 24 h fast. SALF1 CD N = 6; SALF1 FSD N = 6; MORF1 CD N = 7; MORF1 FSD N = 7; *p < 0.05 as compared to all other groups.
Number of differentially expressed genes that reach significance comparing F0 treatment x dietary condition.
| Comparison | Up | Down | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main effect of F0 treatment | 415 | 309 | 724 |
| Effect of F0 treatment CD fed | 1000 | 686 | 1686 |
| Effect of F0 treatment FSD fed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Main effect of diet | 41 | 88 | 129 |
| Effect of FSD in SALF1 | 19 | 75 | 94 |
| Effect of FSD in MORF1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| F0 treatment × diet Interaction | 1 | 0 | 1 |
q value < 0.05.
Figure 5Panel (A): Mean (± SEM) bodyweight after 12 weeks on diet; #p < 0.05 main effect of diet; *p < 0.05 main effect of F0 morphine exposure; SALF1 CD N = 10; SALF1 FSD N = 10; MORF1 CD N = 8; MORF1 FSD N = 8. Panel (B): Mean (± SEM) blood glucose level in response to a glucose challenge in CD or FSD males; *p < 0.05 as compared SALF1 males maintained on the same diet; SALF1 CD N = 10; SALF1 FSD N = 10; MORF1 CD N = 8; MORF1 FSD N = 8.