| Literature DB >> 35100981 |
Nana Yang1, Qianghua Wang2, Biao Ding1, Yingying Gong1, Yue Wu1, Junpei Sun1, Xuegu Wang1, Lei Liu1, Feng Zhang1, Danli Du3, Xiang Li4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from upregulated levels of oxidative stress is commonly implicated in preeclampsia (PE). Ferroptosis is a novel form of iron-dependent cell death instigated by lipid peroxidation that likely plays an important role in PE pathogenesis. This study aimed to investigate the expression profiles and functions of ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) in early-onset preeclampsia (EOPE) and late-onset preeclampsia (LOPE).Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; Early-onset preeclampsia; Ferroptosis; Preeclampsia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35100981 PMCID: PMC8805258 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04423-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.105
Fig. 1Differentially expressed genes in the placental samples of PE patients. A Clinical subtypes of PE patients and controls who delivered preterm or at term. B The principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene expression datasets. C The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for the different comparisons. D The overlapping genes between the comparisons of EOPE and LOPE patients, LOPE patients and preterm controls, preterm and term controls and EOPE patients and term controls. E Numbers of up- and downregulated genes in the comparisons
Fig. 2Differentially expressed FRGs in the placental samples of PE patients. A The volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in the placental samples of EOPE patients. B The volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in the placental samples of LOPE patients. C The overlapping genes between FRGs and comparisons of EOPE patients and preterm controls and LOPE patients and term controls. D The overlapping FRGs between drivers, suppressors and markers. E The distribution of up- and downregulated ferroptosis regulators and markers in EOPE and LOPE patients. F The heatmap of differentially expressed FRGs in the placental samples of preeclampsia patients and the dendrogram based on the clustering analysis. Green represents downregulation, while red represents upregulation of the genes. G Deviation plot of up- and downregulated FRGs in the placental samples of EOPE patients
The differentially expressed FRGs in placenta of EOPE patients
| Upregulated | Downregulated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene symbol | Adjusted | logFC | Gene symbol | Adjusted | logFC |
| EGFR | 6.64E-03 | 1.447 | IREB2 | 8.71E-03 | 0.289 |
| CDO1 | 8.76E-03 | 1.365 | CYBB | 6.25E-03 | 1.215 |
| HILPDA | 2.07E-03 | 1.660 | SCP2 | 5.63E-03 | 1.382 |
| DPP4 | 1.18E-02 | 1.010 | |||
| MAPK8 | 1.35E-04 | 1.000 | |||
| GPT2 | 2.49E-03 | 1.871 | FTH1 | 2.65E-03 | 1.272 |
| SLC7A5 | 2.20E-02 | 1.473 | VLDLR | 2.96E-03 | 1.189 |
| HERPUD1 | 9.48E-03 | 1.256 | FTL | 8.90E-03 | 1.004 |
| GDF15 | 2.74E-02 | 2.787 | |||
| ARRDC3 | 1.35E-03 | 1.388 | |||
| SLC2A1 | 1.62E-02 | 1.104 | |||
| LINC00336 | 1.39E-03 | 1.084 | FTH1 | 2.65E-03 | 1.272 |
| PLIN2 | 2.68E-03 | 2.864 | ENPP2 | 5.07E-03 | 1.333 |
| ACSL3 | 2.38E-02 | 0.372 | |||
| HIF1A | 2.95E-02 | 1.088 | |||
Fig. 3Representative results of GO analyses. A Bubble plots of the GO analyses. B Results of the GO analyses
Fig. 4Gene interactions of differentially expressed FRGs in preeclampsia patients. A The network of the differentially expressed FRGs downloaded from the STRING database. B The top 10 hub FRGs distinguished using color shading from yellow to red, according to the score
Top 10 genes in the network ranked by the degree method
| Rank | Name | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | EGFR | 10 |
| 1 | MAPK8 | 10 |
| 3 | SLC2A1 | 8 |
| 4 | HIF1A | 6 |
| 5 | FTH1 | 3 |
| 6 | FTL | 2 |
| 6 | IREB2 | 2 |
| 6 | SLC7A5 | 2 |
| 6 | GDF15 | 2 |
| 6 | PLIN2 | 2 |
Clinical information of the patients
| Category | EOPE( | Normal( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.32 ± 1.152 | 31.96 ± 0.8218 | 0.2244 |
| Gestational age at delivery (weeks) | 33.88 ± 0.5745 | 38.88 ± 0.2505 | < 0.0001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 165.5 ± 3.526 | 113.1 ± 2.185 | < 0.0001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 108.1 ± 3.097 | 73.85 ± 1.316 | < 0.0001 |
| Proteinuria (%) | 100 | 0 | < 0.0001 |
| Neonatal birth weight (g) | 2043 ± 181.1 | 3494 ± 128.9 | < 0.0001 |
| 1 min Apgar(score) | 8.318 ± 0.3443 | 9.885 ± 0.0639 | < 0.0001 |
Fig. 5The relative expression of differentially expressed FRGs in the placental samples. The control (Con) group included normal placental samples, and the EOPE group included placental samples from patients with preeclampsia. The sample sizes (Con: n = 26, EOPE: n = 22) achieve 81–99% power to reject the null hypothesis of equal means using a 2-sided, 2-sample equal-variance t test. **P < 0.01