Literature DB >> 21826038

Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' practice bulletins.

Jason D Wright1, Neha Pawar, Julie S R Gonzalez, Sharyn N Lewin, William M Burke, Lynn L Simpson, Abigail S Charles, Mary E D'Alton, Thomas J Herzog.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical guidelines are an important source of guidance for clinicians. Few studies have examined the quality of scientific data underlying evidence-based guidelines. We examined the quality of evidence that underlies the recommendations made by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College).
METHODS: The current practice bulletins of the College were examined. Each bulletin makes multiple recommendations. Each recommendation is categorized based on the quality and quantity of evidence that underlies the recommendation into one of three levels of evidence: A (good and consistent evidence), B (limited or inconsistent evidence), or C (consensus and opinion). We analyzed the distribution of levels of evidence for obstetrics and gynecology recommendations.
RESULTS: A total of 84 practice bulletins that offered 717 individual recommendations were identified. Forty-eight (57.1%) of the guidelines were obstetric and 36 (42.9%) were gynecologic. When all recommendations were considered, 215 (30.0%) provided level A evidence, 270 (37.7%) level B, and 232 (32.3%) level C. Among obstetric recommendations, 93 (25.5%) were level A, 145 (39.7%) level B, and 117 (34.8%) level C. For the gynecologic recommendations, 122 (34.7%) were level A, 125 (35.5%) level B, and 105 (29.8%) level C. The gynecology recommendations were more likely to be of level A evidence than the obstetrics recommendations (P=.049).
CONCLUSION: One third of the recommendations put forth by the College in its practice bulletins are based on good and consistent scientific evidence.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826038     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  16 in total

1.  Diaspora of clinical medicine: exploring the rift between conventional and alternative health care.

Authors:  Stephen J Genuis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Exploring the ethical and regulatory issues in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert M Califf; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential.

Authors:  Catarina Correia; Nuno Almeida; Pedro Narra Figueiredo
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Employment during pregnancy and obstetric intervention without medical reason: labor induction and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Pamela Jo Johnson; Dwenda K Gjerdingen; Patricia M McGovern
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

5.  Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines: how evidence-based are they?

Authors:  K Prusova; L Churcher; A Tyler; A U Lokugamage
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 6.  Human rights in childbirth, narratives and restorative justice: a review.

Authors:  A U Lokugamage; S D C Pathberiya
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Adrian F Hernandez; Gloria D Coronado; Lynn L DeBar; Laura M Dember; Beverly B Green; Patrick J Heagerty; Susan S Huang; Kathryn T James; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Vincent Mor; Richard Platt; Gary E Rosenthal; Edward J Septimus; Gregory E Simon; Karen L Staman; Jeremy Sugarman; Miguel Vazquez; Douglas Zatzick; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Systematic review of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: Implications for research and policy.

Authors:  Arjun K Venkatesh; Dan Savage; Benjamin Sandefur; Kenneth R Bernard; Craig Rothenberg; Jeremiah D Schuur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of the quality, content and perceived utility of local maternity guidelines in hospitals in England implementing the saving babies' lives care bundle to reduce stillbirth.

Authors:  Yu Zhen Lau; Kate Widdows; Stephen A Roberts; Sheher Khizar; Gillian L Stephen; Saima Rauf; Alexander E P Heazell
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-04

10.  Scientific evidence underlying the American College of Gastroenterology's clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Chase Meyer; Aaron Bowers; Cole Wayant; Jake Checketts; Jared Scott; Sanjeev Musuvathy; Matt Vassar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.