Literature DB >> 3510084

Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy.

M D Smith, R Handshoe, S Handshoe, O L Kwan, A N DeMaria.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the accuracies of the two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) and Doppler pressure half-time methods for the noninvasive estimation of cardiac catheterization measurements of mitral valve area in patients with pure mitral stenosis both with and without a previous commissurotomy. Data were retrospectively obtained from 74 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization within a 30 month period for evaluation of mitral stenosis, and who had two-dimensional echocardiograms performed before catheterization. Six patients (8.1%) had technically inadequate 2DE images and their data were excluded from analysis. Two of these patients had undergone commissurotomy, while the remaining four had not. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic examinations were attempted in 45 patients and adequate measurements of pressure half-times were obtained in all patients studied. Mitral valve area by two-dimensional echocardiography was measured as the planimetered area along the inner border of the smallest mitral orifice visualized during short-axis scanning, while pressure half-time was calculated as the interval between the peak transmitral velocity and velocity/square root 2 as measured from the envelope of the Doppler spectral signal. Calculations from catheterization represented the minimal valve area at rest as derived from the Gorlin formula with the use of pressure gradients and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output. Thirty-seven of the patients had had a previous mitral commissurotomy a mean of 11.2 +/- 5.4 years before, while the remaining 37 patients were previously unoperated. Mean valve area as determined at catheterization for the total group of patients ranged from 0.37 to 2.30 cm2 (mean = 1.08 +/- 0.42 cm2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510084     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.73.1.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  9 in total

1.  Measurement of vena contracta width for the assessment of severity of mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Tae-Ho Park; Min-Ah Park; Su-Hun Lee; Kwang-Soo Cha; Moo-Hyun Kim; Young-Dae Kim; Young-Seoub Hong
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Value of a modified continuity equation method to quantify mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm.

Authors:  W Voelker; B Regele; H Dittmann; M Schmid; M Mauser; V Kühlkamp; K R Karsch
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1991-12-11

Review 3.  An introduction to transoesophageal echocardiography: I. Basic principles.

Authors:  F Béïque; D Joffe; S Kleiman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Assessment of cardiac hemodynamics and valvular function by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; J Dubin; R B Devereux
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-10

Review 5.  Quantitative applications of Doppler cardiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  S D Colan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Clinical application in routine practice of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis.

Authors:  Ahmed Bennis; Abdennasser Drighil; Christophe Tribouilloy; Asmaa Drighil; Nacer Chraibi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Comparisons between female and male patients with mitral stenosis.

Authors:  C W Chiang; C T Kuo; W J Chen; C B Lee; T S Hsu
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-12

8.  A comparison of the assessment of mitral valve area by continuous wave Doppler and by cross sectional echocardiography.

Authors:  F Loperfido; F Laurenzi; F Gimigliano; F Pennestri; L M Biasucci; C Vigna; F De Santis; A Favuzzi; E Rossi; U Manzoli
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-04

9.  Should all patients with atrial fibrillation be screened with echocardiography?

Authors:  N A Desbiens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.