| Literature DB >> 35100325 |
Misato Niibo1,2, Akane Kanasaki1, Tetsuo Iida1, Keisuke Ohnishi2, Taro Ozaki2, Kazuya Akimitsu3, Tetsuo Minamino2.
Abstract
d-allulose is a rare sugar that has been reported to possess anti-hyperglycemic effects. In the present study, we hypothesized that d-allulose is effective in attenuating the progression of diabetic nephropathy in the Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drinking water with or without 3% d-allulose was administered to OLETF rats for 13 weeks. Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka rats that received drinking water without d-allulose were used as non-diabetic control rats. d-allulose significantly attenuated the increase in blood glucose levels and progressive mesangial expansion in the glomerulus, which is regarded as a characteristic of diabetic nephropathy, in OLETF rats. d-allulose also attenuated the significant increases in renal IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α mRNA levels in OLETF rats, which is a proinflammatory parameter. Additionally, we showed that d-allulose suppresses mesangial matrix expansion, but its correlation with suppressing renal inflammation in OLETF rats should be investigated further. Collectively, our results support the hypothesis that d-allulose can prevent diabetic nephropathy in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35100325 PMCID: PMC8803202 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263300
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Nutritional composition of the diet.
| Nutrient | Value per 100 g of diet | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | kcal | 359 |
| Carbohydrates | g | 55.3 |
| Fiber | g | 2.8 |
| Total lipid | g | 5.1 |
| Protein | g | 23.1 |
| Vitamin | g | 0.650 |
| Mineral | g | 3.25 |
Body weight, food and water intake, tissue weights, and plasma and urine parameters of the experimental rats.
| LETO | O-C | O-A | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 460 | ± | 9 | 567 | ± | 16 | 567 | ± | 15 | <0.001 |
| Final body weight (g) | 463 | ± | 9 | 539 | ± | 31 | 576 | ± | 17 | 0.017 |
| Body weight gain (g) | 2.85 | ± | 3.73 | -28.4 | ± | 20.1 | 9.58 | ± | 16.52 | 0.248 |
| Food intake (g/day) | 23.1 | ± | 0.6 | 36.3 | ± | 1.3 | 29.5 | ± | 0.8 | <0.001 |
| Water intake (mL/day) | 29.6 | ± | 1.0 | 93.3 | ± | 16.4 | 46.2 | ± | 8.5 | 0.004 |
| Tissue weights (g/100 g BW) | ||||||||||
| Kidney | 0.490 | ± | 0.008 | 0.694 | ± | 0.055 | 0.629 | ± | 0.041 | 0.027 |
| Liver | 2.39 | ± | 0.02 | 3.66 | ± | 0.15 | 3.56 | ± | 0.19 | <0.001 |
| Perirenal WAT | 2.15 | ± | 0.07 | 6.77 | ± | 0.60 | 7.55 | ± | 0.26 | <0.001 |
| Plasma parameters (mg/dL) | ||||||||||
| Creatinine | 0.450 | ± | 0.019 | 0.270 | ± | 0.015 | 0.252 | ± | 0.008 | <0.001 |
| BUN | 15.7 | ± | 0.7 | 18.6 | ± | 1.9 | 17.1 | ± | 2.4 | 0.661 |
| Urine parameters | ||||||||||
| NAG (U/24 h) | 0.085 | ± | 0.014 | 0.486 | ± | 0.052 | 0.411 | ± | 0.024 | <0.001 |
| Albumin (mg/24 h) | 0.137 | ± | 0.032 | 141 | ± | 46 | 66.5 | ± | 11.8 | 0.025 |
The data show mean ± standard error (SE) (n = 10 for OLETF rats and n = 6 for LETO rats).
abcDifferent letters in the same column indicate statistical difference, P < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. P-values were detected using one-way ANOVA.
BW, body weight; WAT, white adipose tissue; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; NAG, N-acetyl glucosaminidase; LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka; OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty; O-C, OLETF control; O-A, OLETF d-allulose.
Fig 1Periodic changes in the biochemical parameters relating glucose metabolism in OLETF and LETO rats.
(A) Non-fasting blood glucose. (B) Fasting blood glucose. (C) Non-fasting insulin levels. The data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) (n = 10 for OLETF rats and n = 6 for LETO rats). The overall P value from the two-way repeated measures ANOVA with repeated measures is shown in the graph. abDifferent letters in the same column indicate statistical difference, P < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka; OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty; O-C, OLETF control; O-A, OLETF d-allulose.
Fig 2Histological analyses of kidneys in LETO and OLETF rats.
(A) Kidney histological sections by the periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stains (400 ×). (B) PAS-positive area within the total glomerular area. The data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) (n = 10 for OLETF rats and n = 6 for LETO rats). abDifferent letters in the same column indicate statistical difference, P < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. PAS, periodic acid-Schiff; LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka; OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty; O-C, OLETF control; O-A, OLETF d-allulose.
Fig 3Effects of d-allulose on renal mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines.
(A) mRNA levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6). (B) mRNA levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). The data are presented as mean ± standard error (SE) (n = 10 for OLETF rats and n = 6 for LETO rats). abDifferent letters in the same column indicate statistical difference, P < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. GAPDH, Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; LETO, Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka; OLETF, Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty; O-C, OLETF control; O-A, OLETF d-allulose.