Literature DB >> 35099778

The Impact of Oocyte Vitrification on Offspring: a Systematic Review.

Caroline M Da Luz1,2, Marília A Caetano1,2, Thalita S Berteli1,2, Alessandra A Vireque3, Paula A Navarro4,5.   

Abstract

Oocyte vitrification is a widespread and well-established assisted reproduction technique that has enabled some patient groups to obtain clinical results equivalent to those using fresh oocytes. However, as the number of babies born from vitrified oocytes has increased, so has the discussion regarding the method's safety for the offspring. Cryogenic oocyte damage caused by chemical, mechanical, and thermal stress has raised concern. In this systematic review, we asked the question of whether oocyte vitrification impacts offspring health. From 2007 to 2021, 13 studies were included in the analysis. All studies were observational and presented neonatal outcomes. A total of 4,159 babies were analyzed. Data from these studies were used to assess the following outcomes: multiple pregnancies, cesarean section, gestational age at delivery, the number of live births, birth weight, Apgar scores, congenital anomalies, and baby health. The most extended follow-ups evaluated children until 1, 2, and 6 years of age. According to the evidence appraised in this systematic review, vitrification seems to be a safe method for oocyte cryopreservation and child health, at least in the short term. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for additional long-term data results from big databases and also for randomized controlled trials to improve the levels of evidence.
© 2022. Society for Reproductive Investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; Offspring; Oocyte; Perinatal outcomes; Vitrification

Year:  2022        PMID: 35099778     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00868-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  27 in total

1.  Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Paulo C Serafini; Joyce Fioravanti; Isaac Yadid; Marcio Coslovsky; Pericles Hassun; José Roberto Alegretti; Eduardo L Motta
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kutluk Oktay; Aylin Pelin Cil; Heejung Bang
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  The current challenges to efficient immature oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Fausta Brambillasca; Maria Cristina Guglielmo; Giovanni Coticchio; Mario Mignini Renzini; Mariabeatrice Dal Canto; Rubens Fadini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Oocyte vitrification: advances, progress and future goals.

Authors:  Ri-Cheng Chian; Yao Wang; Yi-Ran Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  C Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Ziru Jiang; Yinyu Wang; Jing Lin; Jingjing Xu; Guolian Ding; Hefeng Huang
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 7.  Cryopreservation of animal oocytes and embryos: Current progress and future prospects.

Authors:  A A Mandawala; S C Harvey; T K Roy; K E Fowler
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report.

Authors:  L Kuleshova; L Gianaroli; C Magli; A Ferraretti; A Trounson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now?

Authors:  Catrin E Argyle; Joyce C Harper; Melanie C Davies
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Clarisa Gracia; Roberta Maggiulli; Andrew R LaBarbera; Daniel J Kaser; Filippo M Ubaldi; Sheryl Vanderpoel; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  1 in total

1.  "Double Frozen Transfer" Could Influence the Perinatal and Children's Growth: A Nested Case-Control Study of 6705 Live Birth Cycles.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Yiyuan Zhang; Linlin Cui; Tao Zhang; Bingjie Wu; Shanshan Gao; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.055

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.