Literature DB >> 20171613

Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification.

Gary D Smith1, Paulo C Serafini, Joyce Fioravanti, Isaac Yadid, Marcio Coslovsky, Pericles Hassun, José Roberto Alegretti, Eduardo L Motta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare cryopreservation of mature human oocytes with slow-rate freezing and vitrification and determine which is most efficient at establishing a pregnancy.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized.
SETTING: Academically affiliated, private fertility center. PATIENT(S): Consenting patients with concerns about embryo cryopreservation and more than nine mature oocytes at retrieval were randomized to slow-rate freezing or vitrification of supernumerary (more than nine) oocytes. INTERVENTION(S): Oocytes were frozen or vitrified, and upon request oocytes were thawed or warmed, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Oocyte survival, fertilization, embryo development, and clinical pregnancy. RESULT(S): Patient use has resulted in 30 thaws and 48 warmings. Women's age at time of cryopreservation was similar. Oocyte survival was significantly higher following vitrification/warming (81%) compared with freezing/thawing (67%). Fertilization was more successful in oocytes vitrified/warmed compared with frozen/thawed. Fertilized oocytes from vitrification/warming had significantly better cleavage rates (84%) compared with freezing/thawing (71%) and resulted in embryos with significantly better morphology. Although similar numbers of embryos were transferred, embryos resulting from vitrified oocytes had significantly enhanced clinical (38%) pregnancy rates compared with embryos resulting from frozen oocyte (13%). Miscarriage and/or spontaneous abortion rates were similar. CONCLUSION(S): Our results suggest that vitrification/warming is currently the most efficient means of oocyte cryopreservation in relation to subsequent success in establishing pregnancy.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20171613     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  60 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer and fertility preservation.

Authors:  S Samuel Kim; Jennifer Klemp; Carol Fabian
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Irene Woo; Kristin Louie; Wael Salem; Sami I Jabara; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Karine Chung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Oocyte cryopreservation: searching for novel improvement strategies.

Authors:  Natalie A Clark; Jason E Swain
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Optimization of cryoprotectant loading into murine and human oocytes.

Authors:  Jens O M Karlsson; Edyta A Szurek; Adam Z Higgins; Sang R Lee; Ali Eroglu
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  Exposing mouse oocytes to necrostatin 1 during in vitro maturation improves maturation, survival after vitrification, mitochondrial preservation, and developmental competence.

Authors:  Jun Woo Jo; Jung Ryeol Lee; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.060

6.  Live birth of healthy twins following transfer of re-cryopreserved blastocysts developed from frozen embryos recovered from a malfunctioning freezer.

Authors:  Yimin Shu; William H Kutteh; Raymond W Ke
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Survival and post-warming in vitro competence of human oocytes after high security closed system vitrification.

Authors:  N De Munck; G Verheyen; L Van Landuyt; D Stoop; H Van de Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Live birth in a 46 year old using autologous oocytes cryopreserved for a duration of 3 years: a case report documenting fertility preservation at an advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  Susan M Maxwell; Kara N Goldman; Patty A Labella; Caroline McCaffrey; Nicole L Noyes; James Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Fertility preservation in reproductive age women with cancer.

Authors:  Peter Kovacs
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-30

Review 10.  Preserving human cells for regenerative, reproductive, and transfusion medicine.

Authors:  Waseem Asghar; Rami El Assal; Hadi Shafiee; Raymond M Anchan; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.