Literature DB >> 35098026

Modeling Subtypes of Automatically Reinforced Self-Injurious Behavior with the Evolutionary Theory of Behavior Dynamics.

Samuel L Morris1, J J McDowell2.   

Abstract

The subtypes of automatically reinforced self-injurious behavior (ASIB) delineated by Hagopian and colleagues (Hagopian et al., 2015; 2017) demonstrated how functional-analysis (FA) outcomes may predict the efficacy of various treatments. However, the mechanisms underlying the different patterns of responding obtained during FAs and corresponding differences in treatment efficacy have remained unclear. A central cause of this lack of clarity is that some proposed mechanisms, such as differences in the reinforcing efficacy of the products of ASIB, are difficult to manipulate. One solution may be to model subtypes of ASIB using mathematical models of behavior in which all aspects of the behavior can be controlled. In the current study, we used the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics (ETBD; McDowell, 2019) to model the subtypes of ASIB, evaluate predictions of treatment efficacy, and replicate recent research aiming to test explanations for subtype differences. Implications for future research related to ASIB are discussed. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021, corrected publication 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic reinforcement; Behavior dynamics; Evolutionary theory, Self-injurious behavior

Year:  2021        PMID: 35098026      PMCID: PMC8738813          DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00297-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci        ISSN: 2520-8969


  45 in total

Review 1.  On the current status of the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics applied to concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  J J McDowell; Bryan Klapes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the falsifiability of matching theory.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Manipulating parameters of reinforcement to reduce problem behavior without extinction.

Authors:  S Shanun Kunnavatana; Sarah E Bloom; Andrew L Samaha; Timothy A Slocum; Casey J Clay
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 5.  The concept of automatic reinforcement: implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities.

Authors:  T R Vollmer
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1994 May-Jun

6.  Selection by consequences.

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy.

Authors:  J J McDowell
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1982-07

8.  Further analysis of subtypes of automatically reinforced SIB: A replication and quantitative analysis of published datasets.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Griffin W Rooker; Jennifer R Zarcone; Andrew C Bonner; Alexander R Arevalo
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-12-29

9.  Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; L A LeBlanc; A S Worsdell; S E Lindauer; K M Keeney
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

Review 10.  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Foreign Med Chir Rev       Date:  1860-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.