| Literature DB >> 35097175 |
Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi1, Mohammadreza Razzaghof1, Mohammad Ali Ghasemi1.
Abstract
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a postoperative wound care method, which has recently become an ongoing field of research in hip and knee arthroplasty. We report the successful management of wound dehiscence and infection after THA in a case of Marfan syndrome by closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT). Our patient also developed a rare postoperative neurologic complication, that is, Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS). To our knowledge, this is the first report of PTS and ciNPWT use for SSI after THA in a Marfan patient. As wound dehiscence and infection can occur after THA in Marfan patients, we propose ciNPWT as an option to treat or even prevent (prophylactic use) such complications in this rare group of patients.Entities:
Keywords: Marfan syndrome; Negative-pressure wound therapy; Parsonage-Turner syndrome; Surgical site infection; Total hip arthroplasty
Year: 2022 PMID: 35097175 PMCID: PMC8783111 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthroplast Today ISSN: 2352-3441
Figure 1The patient’s facies (a) and preopertaive (b) and postoperative pelvic radiographs (c).
Figure 2The patient’s left hip wound through different stages of treatment: (a) severe dehiscence 4 days before the first session of I&D (POD 17); (b) discharge from proximal end of the wound 3 days after first I&D (POD 24); (c) recurrent wound dehiscence 5 days before the second I&D (POD 41); (d) significant response to negative-pressure wound therapy 8 days after the second I&D and NPWD application (POD 54); (e) complete wound closure at the time of patient’s discharge (POD 69); (f) full wound healing 2 weeks after discharge (POD 83).
The patient's four-extremity neurologic examination.
| Limb | Muscular group | Motor | Limb segments | Sensory | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Right | Left | |||
| Upper limb | Shoulder abduction | 5 | 4 | Arm | Medial side: ↓ | Nl |
| Elbow flexion | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Elbow extension | 4 | 3 | ||||
| Wrist extension | 5 | 3 | Forearm | Medial side: ↓ | Nl | |
| Finger extension | 5 | 2 | Elbow | Medial side: ↓ | Lateral margin: ↓ | |
| Finger abduction | 5 | 5 | ||||
| Thumb abduction | 3 | 0 | Hand | Median territory: ↓↓ | Generalized: ↓↓ | |
| Lower limb | Hip flexion | 4 | - | Foot | Nl | Medial margin: ↓ |
| Hip extension | 4 | - | ||||
| Knee flexion | 4 | - | ||||
| Knee extension | 4 | - | ||||
| Ankle dorsiflexion | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Ankle plantar flexion | 4 | 4 | ||||
| 1st toe dorsiflexion | 4 | 3 | ||||
Muscle forces are assessed clinically in a scale of 0-5/5.
The assessment of left hip and knee muscular forces was not accurate due to recent left THA.
The immunologic lab profile of the patient.
| Lab parameter | Result |
|---|---|
| ESR (Frequent) | |
| CRP (Frequent) | |
| RF | |
| ANA | 0.9 (08-1.2: Equivocal) |
| Anti-dsDNA | |
| SSB-LA | 7.2 (<12: Normal) |
| SSA-RO | 17.3 (12-18: Equivocal) |
| P-ANCA | 7 (<12: Negative) |
| C-ANCA | 4.4 (<12: Negative) |
| CH50 | >90% (90-100%: Normal) |
| IgA | 118 (70-400: Normal) |
| Serum cryoglobulin | Negative |
| Anti-cardiolipin IgM | 2 (<12: Negative) |
| Anti-cardiolipin IgG | 3.4 (<12: Negative) |
| Anti-phospholipid IgM | 7.9 (<12: Negative) |
| Anti-phospholipid IgG | 4.9 (<12: Negative) |
| Wright (serum) | Negative |
| Wright (CSF) | Negative |
| RPR | Non-Reactive |
| VDRL (serum) | Non-Reactive |
| VDRL (CSF) | Non-Reactive |
| HIV Ab | Negative |
| HCV Ab | Negative |
| HBs Ag | Negative |
| HBc IgM | Negative |
| HTLV-1 Ab | Negative |
| HTLV-2 Ab | Negative |
| HCV Ab | Negative |
| VZV Ab | Negative |
| EBV IgM | Negative |
Positive values are shown in bold.
Figure 3No wound complication at 26-month follow-up.