| Literature DB >> 35096647 |
Xiaoqiang Sun1, Zi Yang1, Yong Nie2, Benxiang Hou1.
Abstract
Microorganisms in the complex root canal system and the extraradicular regions, including the periapical lesions and extraradicular biofilm may cause root canal treatment failures. However, few studies described the difference between the intraradicular and extraradicular infections from the same tooth associated with persistent apical periodontitis. This study aimed to characterize the microbiome present in the root canal, extraradicular biofilm, and periapical lesions associated with persistent apical periodontitis. The microbial communities in the root canal, extraradicular biofilm, and periapical lesions were investigated by Illumina high-throughput sequencing using Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform. The dominant phyla in the extraradicular and intraradicular infections associated with persistent apical periodontitis were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria, and the genera Fusobacterium, Morganella, Porphyromonas, Streptococcus, and Bifidobacterium dominated across all samples. Although extraradicular infection sites showed higher OTU richness and β-diversity compared to intraradicular samples, the occurrence of sinus tract rather than the sampling sites demarcated the microbial communities in the infections associated with persistent apical periodontitis. PERMANOVA analysis confirmed that the samples with or without sinus tracts contained significantly different microbial communities. Porphyromonas, Eubacterium, Treponema, and Phocaeicola were found in significantly higher levels with sinus tracts, whilst Microbacterium and Enterococcus were more abundant in samples without sinus tracts. In conclusion, diverse bacteria were detected in both intraradicular and extraradicular infections associated with persistent apical periodontitis, which might be influenced by the occurrence of the sinus tract. The results may provide new insight into the pathogenesis of persistent apical periodontitis.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; microbial community; periapical lesions; persistent apical periodontitis; root canal; sinus tract
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35096647 PMCID: PMC8791237 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.798367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Comparisons of Alpha diversities of samples collected from the root canal, extraradicular biofilm, and periapical lesions. (A) schematic diagram of sampling; (B) comparison of Shannon index; (C) Comparison of observed OTUs. The P-values were calculated using the student’s t-test.
Sample information.
| Patient Information | Sample information | General sequencing information | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Gender | Age | Tooth ID | Sinus Tract | Sample ID | Sampling Site | Number of sequences | Observed OTUs | Shannon index |
| 1 | Male | 40 | 1 | Yes | A2 | root canal fillings | 55360 | 173 | 3.12 |
| A3 | extraradicular biofilm | 31625 | 241 | 3.50 | |||||
| A4 | periapical lesions | 39316 | 241 | 3.48 | |||||
| 2 | Yes | B2 | root canal fillings | 35541 | 150 | 3.85 | |||
| B4 | extraradicular biofilm | 42688 | 281 | 3.85 | |||||
| B3 | periapical lesions | 35016 | 277 | 2.89 | |||||
| 2 | Female | 29 | 3 | No | C1 | root canal fillings | 45236 | 213 | 4.06 |
| C2 | extraradicular biofilm | 32855 | 368 | 3.73 | |||||
| C5 | periapical lesions | 44039 | 437 | 4.22 | |||||
| C3 | periapical lesions | 44751 | 390 | 4.08 | |||||
| 4 | No | C7 | root canal fillings | 45498 | 279 | 3.86 | |||
| C4 | extraradicular biofilm | 44146 | 327 | 3.72 | |||||
| C8 | periapical lesions | 35702 | 361 | 4.18 | |||||
| 3 | Female | 45 | 5 | No | D4 | root canal fillings | 73876 | 152 | 3.42 |
| D1 | extraradicular biofilm | 50636 | 514 | 4.51 | |||||
| D6 | periapical lesions | 71284 | 303 | 3.60 | |||||
| 4 | Female | 32 | 6 | Yes | D15 | extraradicular biofilm | 48239 | 261 | 3.93 |
| 5 | Male | 47 | 7 | No | D8 | root canal fillings | 34411 | 175 | 0.99 |
| D3 | extraradicular biofilm | 48212 | 66 | 1.27 | |||||
| D5 | periapical lesions | 81702 | 88 | 0.97 | |||||
| 6 | Female | 51 | 8 | Yes | D13 | root canal fillings | 54876 | 200 | 2.69 |
| D10 | periapical lesions | 30569 | 242 | 3.06 | |||||
| 7 | Male | 29 | 9 | Yes | GN | root canal fillings | 50432 | 167 | 1.87 |
| GY | extraradicular biofilm | 70119 | 208 | 1.64 | |||||
| RY | periapical lesions | 66428 | 114 | 3.05 | |||||
| 8 | Male | 32 | 10 | No | D11 | root canal fillings | 39711 | 72 | 0.31 |
| D14 | extraradicular biofilm | 33234 | 229 | 2.38 | |||||
| D7 | periapical lesions | 31693 | 195 | 0.90 | |||||
Figure 2Distribution of OTUs in samples collected from the root canal, extraradicular biofilm, and periapical lesions. (A) the Venn diagram indicates the shared/unique OTUs in samples from the root canal, extraradicular biofilm, and periapical lesions; (B) comparison of beta-diversities between samples within each group. The P-values were calculated using the student’s t-test.
Figure 3Bacterial compositions of samples from the root canal, extraradicular biofilm, and periapical lesions. (A) bacterial compositions at the phylum level; (B) bacterial compositions at the genus level.
Top OTUs classified against the HOMD database.
| Rank | OTU ID | Sum of OTUs in all samples | HOMD | Identity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OTU1570 | 169504 |
| 94.923 |
| 2 | OTU1470 | 132710 |
| 99.065 |
| 3 | OTU983 | 79496 |
| 95.333 |
| 4 | OTU805 | 76149 |
| 99.08 |
| 5 | OTU1567 | 62369 |
| 99.333 |
| 6 | OTU1593 | 35142 |
| 98.824 |
| 7 | OTU1480 | 31288 |
| 99.326 |
| 8 | OTU1402 | 30554 |
| 99.061 |
| 9 | OTU1562 | 30112 |
| 98.824 |
| 10 | OTU365 | 30049 |
| 99.333 |
| 11 | OTU363 | 28506 |
| 99.333 |
| 12 | OTU1435 | 27434 |
| 98.605 |
| 13 | OTU10 | 26143 |
| 99.324 |
| 14 | OTU996 | 23485 |
| 99.532 |
| 15 | OTU113 | 22976 |
| 99.327 |
| 16 | OTU44 | 21569 |
| 98.876 |
| 17 | OTU234 | 21493 |
| 99.113 |
| 18 | OTU1427 | 21433 |
| 98.222 |
| 19 | OTU7 | 17587 |
| 96.222 |
| 20 | OTU126 | 16728 |
| 99.302 |
Figure 4PCoA plots of samples in intraradicular and extraradicular infections associated with persistent apical periodontitis. (A) PCoA plot of samples grouped based on the sampling sites; (B) PCoA plot of samples grouped based on the existence of sinus tract.
Figure 5Genera presented significantly different relative abundances between samples with or without sinus tracts. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 6Classification of samples by Random forest analysis. (A) sample distribution in the Random forest model; (B) the genera with the highest importance scores in the Random forest model.