Kumar Subramanian1, Andre K Mickel. 1. Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. drskumars@gmail.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The microbial etiology of periradicular lesions is recognized; however, the bacterial profile of these lesions is not well elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of bacterial colonization in these lesions and to characterize the bacterial community present in root ends and periradicular lesions. METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients who presented for apicoectomy of persistent periradicular lesions after endodontic therapy were selected for the study and samples of periradicular tissue and resected root ends collected. Total bacterial levels were estimated for 34 paired periradicular lesions and root ends using real-time polymerase chain reaction with universal bacterial primers. Sixteen pairs of these samples were analyzed using ribosomal 16S cloning and sequencing for bacterial identification. RESULTS: Bacteria were detected more consistently and at higher levels in root ends. Periradicular lesions exhibited a diverse microbial profile with many uncultivated phylotypes. Enterococcus faecalis and Burkholderia cepacia predominated in both samples. Campylobacter gracilis and Streptococcus gordonii were associated with root ends, whereas Atopobium rimae, Peptostreptococcus micros, Streptococcus genomospecies C8, Dialister sp E2_20 E1, and Eubacterium strain A35MT were associated with periradicular lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent periradicular lesions are polymicrobial infections with many as-yet-uncultivated and unknown bacterial species. The bacterial load and microbial profile of root ends is significantly different from the soft-tissue lesion, indicating the presence of diverse bacterial populations in these tissues.
INTRODUCTION: The microbial etiology of periradicular lesions is recognized; however, the bacterial profile of these lesions is not well elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of bacterial colonization in these lesions and to characterize the bacterial community present in root ends and periradicular lesions. METHODS: Thirty-four adult patients who presented for apicoectomy of persistent periradicular lesions after endodontic therapy were selected for the study and samples of periradicular tissue and resected root ends collected. Total bacterial levels were estimated for 34 paired periradicular lesions and root ends using real-time polymerase chain reaction with universal bacterial primers. Sixteen pairs of these samples were analyzed using ribosomal 16S cloning and sequencing for bacterial identification. RESULTS: Bacteria were detected more consistently and at higher levels in root ends. Periradicular lesions exhibited a diverse microbial profile with many uncultivated phylotypes. Enterococcus faecalis and Burkholderia cepacia predominated in both samples. Campylobacter gracilis and Streptococcus gordonii were associated with root ends, whereas Atopobium rimae, Peptostreptococcus micros, Streptococcus genomospecies C8, Dialister sp E2_20 E1, and Eubacterium strain A35MT were associated with periradicular lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent periradicular lesions are polymicrobial infections with many as-yet-uncultivated and unknown bacterial species. The bacterial load and microbial profile of root ends is significantly different from the soft-tissue lesion, indicating the presence of diverse bacterial populations in these tissues.
Authors: M S Endo; F C Martinho; A A Zaia; C C R Ferraz; J F A Almeida; B P F A Gomes Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: L Karygianni; A C Anderson; C Tennert; K Kollmar; M J Altenburger; E Hellwig; A Al-Ahmad Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Peter J Moses; Daniel A Power; Amy M Jesionowski; Howard F Jenkinson; Eugene A Pantera; M Margaret Vickerman Journal: J Endod Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: Annette Carola Anderson; Elmar Hellwig; Robin Vespermann; Annette Wittmer; Michael Schmid; Lamprini Karygianni; Ali Al-Ahmad Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 3.240