Literature DB >> 35096076

Before Schizophrenia: Schizophrenic Vulnerability in Developmental Age and Its Detection.

Michele Poletti1, Andrea Raballo2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35096076      PMCID: PMC8785426          DOI: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20210602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropsychiatry        ISSN: 1724-4935


× No keyword cloud information.
In the field of psychiatry and mental health, early intervention is one of the hottest issues of the last decades. This increasing attention to early manifestations of risk for mental illness is due to heightened awareness on the fact that the clinical onset of many severe mental illnesses in adolescence or early adulthood is preceded by a period of progressive structuration and manifestation of psychopathological vulnerabilities (Raballo & Poletti, 2020). Along this perspective, apart from acute psychopathological reactions to extreme life-events, severe mental illnesses do not come out of the blue, but rather represent a progressive quantitative and qualitative symptomatic progression accompanied by a progressive functional impairment, with subjective severity signaled by help-seeking. Broadly considered as the period of transition from childhood to adulthood, adolescence is the key developmental stage in which such a vulnerability to psychopathology (the so called ‘p’ factor, Caspi & Moffitt, 2018) begins to be progressively overt (Allegrini et al., 2020), as documented by the epidemiological peak of clinical onset of several mental disorders (Paus et al., 2008). As younger is the manifestation as more transdiagnostic or pluripotent appears the longitudinal psychopathological risk, with many heterotypic directions that can be traced from similar starting points. Indeed, the early detection paradigm has been originally conceived in the field of psychosis, especially schizophrenic psychosis, supported by the clinical staging model of psychosis (McGorry et al., 2006), but subsequently shifted to a transdiagnostic update (McGorry et al., 2018) and other mental disorders, as bipolar disorder (Saraf et al., 2021; Vieta et al., 2018), obsessive compulsive disorder (Fineberg et al., 2019; Preti et al., 2022) and eating disorder (Treasure & Russell, 2011).

Before schizophrenia

In the perspective of an early detection of psychopathological risk, schizophrenia remains one of the most interesting severe mental illnesses, being more characterized in the comparison with other illnesses by evident putative premorbid and prodromal features (Parellada et al., 2017). While prodromal features of schizophrenic psychosis are now well characterized by clinical descriptors of Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) subgroups (Fusar-Poli et al., 2013), putative premorbid features indexing a schizophrenic vulnerability are more elusive, although early manifest and progressively impacting on functioning, so that the clinical stage of schizophrenia in terms of first episode of psychosis is now considered a rather late stage of an altered neurodevelopment (Insel, 2010). As regards the neurodevelopmental trajectory headed to schizophrenia, while early genetic and environmental risk factors (Birnbaum & Weinberger, 2017; Stilo & Murray, 2019) as well as late prodromal features (Fusar-Poli et al., 2013) are well described, intermediate longitudinal dynamics between early triggers and late prodromes are poorly characterized. This divergent cross-eyed view let paradoxically neglected the longest period of schizophrenic vulnerability structuration, i.e., the putative premorbid stage of schizophrenia, in which instead many (endo)phenotypic features in multiple domains can be described and profiled (Poletti & Raballo, 2020; Poletti, 2021). Among these features, childhood motor impairment and intersubjective difficulties are of particular salience for the aim of an early detection of schizophrenic risk and their developmental dynamics are briefly sketched.

From childhood motor impairment to disembodiment

Childhood motor impairment is associated with both early genetic and environmental risk factors for schizophrenia and is predictive of subsequent schizophrenic psychosis in offspring of schizophrenic patients (Burton et al., 2016, 2017). Interestingly, impairments in corollary discharge mechanisms may represent a common pathophysiological correlate of both childhood motor impairment (Poletti et al., 2019a) and psychotic symptoms as hallucinations and passivity phenomena (Feinberg, 1978), with the latter developed through intermediate alteration of the Sense of Agency (Poletti et al., 2017, 2019b). Impairments in corollary discharges and their effects on sensory-motor integration and motor coordination in children may represent the schizotaxic (i.e., neurobiological) basis of vulnerability to schizophrenia that has been hypothesized since seminal conceptualizations of schizotypy proposed by Rado (1960) and Meehl (1962). The childhood motor impairment evident at the phenotypic level may be associated, at the subjective phenomenological level, with the structuration of a progressive alteration of embodiment resulting in the adult schizophrenic disembodiment, i.e., the lack of an immediate and implicit attunement between the Self and the body. This pathological detachment from the bodily side of the Self has been described in various prototypical forms, e. g., deanimated body (that is a body deprived of the possibility of living personal experience as its own) or disembodied spirit (that is a sort of abstract entity which contemplates its own existence from outside, in a third-perspective rather than in a first-perspective) (Stanghellini, 2009)

From intersubjective impairment to social anhedonia

In premorbid phases of schizophrenic vulnerability, childhood intersubjective difficulties in the implicit attunement with peers may gradually evolve at the subjective level towards interpersonal oversensitivity to feelings, intermittent sensations of exposure and self-reference, and perceived negative attitudes of others. Such experiences in the social domain may facilitate a gradual loss of spontaneity in the way of relating to others, as well as the developmental of social hypohedonia, alterations of intersubjective resonance, propensity to de-socializing and solipsistic modes of experience (Raballo & Krueger, 2011), up to schizophrenic autism in most severe cases (Parnas et al., 2002). This trajectory is coherent with narratives of adult schizophrenic patients that often allocate a sense of quasi-ontological awareness of interhuman alterity in their childhood. Such a sense of irreducible alterity and alienation is not reduced to common psychological reasons that usually accompany thoughts of loneliness, shyness and normal interpersonal frustrations in children and adolescents. By contrast, in childhood memories of schizophrenic patients, the feeling of alterity and alienation from peers is more subtle, radical and intimate at the same time, and often hard to properly verbalize, so that it can be expressed through the appearance of childhood fantasies (Parnas & Henriksen, 2014).

From the schizotaxic Self to clinical symptoms

Full-blown psychotic symptoms in the schizophrenic spectrum does not generally emerge suddenly, but rather reflect a prolonged developmental trajectory facilitated by progressive anomalies of subjective experience, defined as Self-disorders. Self-disorders are trait-like, non-psychotic anomalies of subjectivity that have been recursively and meta-analytically corroborated as schizophrenia-spectrum disorders vulnerability phenotypes (Raballo et al., 2021). They encompass varieties of depersonalization, derealization and similar distortions of the subjective experience, characterized by a diminished sense of existing as an embodied, coherent subject, vitally immersed in the world and author of his own actions. In the previous sections, two possible developmental trajectories from childhood features to subsequent trait-like anomalous subjective experiences (as disembodiment and social anhedonia) have been outlined, suggesting that Self-disorders may reflect at the subjective experiential level that neurobiological vulnerability associated with early genetic and environmental risk factors and triggering an altered neurodevelopment. These abnormal subjective experiences can constitute the schizotaxic Self (Raballo & Parnas, 2011) of patients within the schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and the interaction of such trait-like basis with risk and protective factors as well as with life-events, might produce a different degree of symptomatic expression towards the negative and the positive dimensions.

Conclusions: early detection of risk is possible

An early detection of features indexing a possible psychotic and schizophrenic longitudinal risk is possible and feasible not only from a neurodevelopmentally late period as the prodromal stage described by CHR-P criteria. Although unspecific and not deterministic as regards their prognostic power, some endophenotypic features of risk may be observed and profiled since childhood premorbid stages, as for example in the motor and in the social domains, progressively focusing on their subjective resonance. Further studies are needed to refine such profiles of risk in the premorbid period as regards the schizophrenia spectrum, as well further studies are needed to profile possible premorbid and prodromal features of other severe mental illnesses in the perspective of their early detection.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Impaired Corollary Discharge in Psychosis and At-Risk States: Integrating Neurodevelopmental, Phenomenological, and Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Michele Poletti; Alfonso Tortorella; Andrea Raballo
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-05-22

Review 2.  All for One and One for All: Mental Disorders in One Dimension.

Authors:  Avshalom Caspi; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  The case for early intervention in anorexia nervosa: theoretical exploration of maintaining factors.

Authors:  Janet Treasure; Gerald Russell
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 4.  Early Intervention in Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Eduard Vieta; Estela Salagre; Iria Grande; André F Carvalho; Brisa S Fernandes; Michael Berk; Boris Birmaher; Mauricio Tohen; Trisha Suppes
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Developmental Psychotic Risk: Toward a Neurodevelopmentally Informed Staging of Vulnerability to Psychosis.

Authors:  Michele Poletti; Andrea Raballo
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Early intervention for obsessive compulsive disorder: An expert consensus statement.

Authors:  Naomi A Fineberg; Bernardo Dell'Osso; Umberto Albert; Giuseppe Maina; Daniel Geller; Lior Carmi; Nick Sireau; Susanne Walitza; Giacomo Grassi; Stefano Pallanti; Eric Hollander; Vlasios Brakoulias; Jose M Menchon; Donatella Marazziti; Konstantinos Ioannidis; Annemieke Apergis-Schoute; Dan J Stein; Danielle C Cath; Dick J Veltman; Michael Van Ameringen; Leonardo F Fontenelle; Roseli G Shavitt; Daniel Costa; Juliana B Diniz; Joseph Zohar
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.600

Review 7.  Research Review: Do motor deficits during development represent an endophenotype for schizophrenia? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Birgitte Klee Burton; Carsten Hjorthøj; Jens Richardt Jepsen; Anne Thorup; Merete Nordentoft; Kerstin J Plessen
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 8.  Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?

Authors:  Tomás Paus; Matcheri Keshavan; Jay N Giedd
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  The silent side of the spectrum: schizotypy and the schizotaxic self.

Authors:  Andrea Raballo; Josef Parnas
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 10.  Non-Genetic Factors in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Simona A Stilo; Robin M Murray
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.