| Literature DB >> 35095835 |
Sofie Olund Villumsen1, Rui Benfeitas2, Andreas Dehlbæk Knudsen1, Marco Gelpi1, Julie Høgh1, Magda Teresa Thomsen1, Daniel Murray3, Henrik Ullum4, Ujjwal Neogi5,6, Susanne Dam Nielsen1.
Abstract
People living with HIV (PLWH) require life-long anti-retroviral treatment and often present with comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome (MetS). Systematic lipidomic characterization and its association with the metabolism are currently missing. We included 100 PLWH with MetS and 100 without MetS from the Copenhagen Comorbidity in HIV Infection (COCOMO) cohort to examine whether and how lipidome profiles are associated with MetS in PLWH. We combined several standard biostatistical, machine learning, and network analysis techniques to investigate the lipidome systematically and comprehensively and its association with clinical parameters. Additionally, we generated weighted lipid-metabolite networks to understand the relationship between lipidomic profiles with those metabolites associated with MetS in PLWH. The lipidomic dataset consisted of 917 lipid species including 602 glycerolipids, 228 glycerophospholipids, 61 sphingolipids, and 26 steroids. With a consensus approach using four different statistical and machine learning methods, we observed 13 differentially abundant lipids between PLWH without MetS and PLWH with MetS, which mainly belongs to diacylglyceride (DAG, n = 2) and triacylglyceride (TAG, n = 11). The comprehensive network integration of the lipidomics and metabolomics data suggested interactions between specific glycerolipids' structural composition patterns and key metabolites involved in glutamate metabolism. Further integration of the clinical data with metabolomics and lipidomics resulted in the association of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and exposure to earlier generations of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Our integrative omics data indicated disruption of glutamate and fatty acid metabolism, suggesting their involvement in the pathogenesis of PLWH with MetS. Alterations in the lipid homeostasis and glutaminolysis need clinical interventions to prevent accelerated aging in PLWH with MetS.Entities:
Keywords: HIV-1; antiretroviral treatment; lipidomics; machine learning; metabolic syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35095835 PMCID: PMC8791652 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.742736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Clinical and demographic characteristics compared between PLWH without MetS and PLWH with MetS.
| Variables | PLWH without MetS | PLWH with MetS | pvalue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample (n) | 100 | 100 | |
| Sex, Male, n (%) | 90 (90.0) | 90 (90.0) | 1.00** |
| Age, mean (sd) | 54.4 (9.5) | 54.6 (8.5) | 0.80* |
| Ethnicity, n (%) | 0.87** | ||
| Caucasian | 88 (88.0) | 86 (86.0) | |
| Asian | 3 (3.0) | 2 (2.0) | |
| Black | 4 (4.0) | 6 (6.0) | |
| Other/unknown | 5 (5.0) | 6 (6.0) | |
| Immunodeficiency, n (%) | 14 (14.0) | 13 (13.0) | 1.00** |
| Exposure to early-generation ART, n (%) | 34 (34.0) | 46 (46.0) | 0.11** |
| VAT, mean (sd) | 76.1 (53.6) | 149.4 (71) |
|
| SAT, mean (sd) | 111.1 (71.1) | 150.6 (77.1) |
|
| ART_NRTI, n (%) | 95 (95.0) | 96 (96.0) | 1.00** |
| ART_NNRTI, n (%) | 54 (54.0) | 45 (45.0) | 0.26** |
| ART_PI, n (%) | 37 (37.0) | 47 (47.0) | 0.20** |
| ART_INSTI, n (%) | 16 (16.0) | 21 (21.0) | 0.47** |
| ART_other/unknown, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.0) | 0.24* |
*Mann-Whitney U test and **Chi-square test.
P-values in bold indicates a significant difference in the concerned variables between the two groups. Immunodeficiency was defined as the lowest CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/µl or previous AIDS condition and exposure to early-generation ART was defined as patients medicated with thymidine analogues, didanosine and/or indinavir.
Figure 1Overview of study workflow. Analysis pipeline for characterizing the effect of MetS in HIV-infected following ART treatment and investigating the underlying biological mechanisms of PLWH with MetS (created with BioRender.com).
Figure 2Lipidomics analyses of PLWH without MetS vs PLWH with MetS identifying key lipids differentiating the two groups. (A) Performance of random forest (RF) models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with area under the curve (AUC) values for the three MUVR models. (B) Important prediction variables separating PLWH without MetS from PLWH with MetS based on lipidomics, diacylglycerol (DAG) and triacylglycerol (TAG). Variable’s importance on projection (VIP) scores plot for the ‘Max’ MUVR model, where lower rank indicates better group separation, thus better prediction variables in the model classification. (C) The intersection of methods identifying key lipids. UpSet plot showing number of significant lipids found via four statistical methods (RF, PLS-DA, limma, and Mann-Whitney U test). Note the 13 lipids (intersection size on the y-axis) are simultaneously identified by all four methods. (D) Separation of PLWH without MetS from PLWH with MetS based on identified key biomolecules. Principal component analysis (PCA) on key biomolecules, where lipidomics and metabolomics data were separated by the 13 identified key lipids and 11 identified key metabolites ( ). Ellipses show the 95% confidence interval of the data. (E) Boxplot of lipid concentration of the identified key lipids, which consist of DAGs and TAGs.
Identified key lipids and key metabolites.
| Key lipids | Key metabolites |
|---|---|
| DAG(16:0/18:1) | 1-carboxyethylisoleucine |
| DAG(16:0/18:3) | 4-cholesten-3-one |
| TAG(44:0)-FA(18:0) | 4-hydroxyglutamate |
| TAG(52:2)-FA(16:0) |
|
| TAG(52:2)-FA(18:1) | carotene diol (2) |
| TAG(52:2)-FA(18:2) |
|
| TAG(52:3)-FA(18:1) | glutamate |
| TAG(54:3)-FA(16:0) | glycerate |
| TAG(54:3)-FA(20:2) | isoleucine |
| TAG(54:3)-FA(20:3) | PC/3-MAPC* |
| TAG(54:4)-FA(16:0) | PSP** |
| TAG(54:4)-FA(20:3) | |
| TAG(54:5)-FA(16:0) |
*pimeloylcarnitine/3-methyladipoylcarnitine (C7-DC).
**palmitoyl-sphingosine-phosphoethanolamine (d18:1/16:0).
Overview of key lipids and key metabolites with significant differential abundance between PLWH without MetS and PLWH with MetS. Listed in alphabetical order.
Figure 3Structural differences of the lipidomic profile of PLWH without MetS vs. PLWH with MetS. Heatmaps for each lipid class show the structural lipid composition differences between PLWH without MetS and PLWH with MetS. Each lipid species is shown as a rectangle and the color shows the abundance difference (red: higher in PLWH with MetS; white: no difference; blue: lower in PLWH with MetS), the lipids were organized by the lipid size (y-axis) and level of saturation (x-axis). Lipids with statistically significant differences between the two groups were highlighted with a symbol. P-values have been FDR adjusted.
Figure 4Global and local biomolecular network of PLWH without MetS vs PLWH with MetS. (A) Global network illustrating the associated clinical variables and ontology terms with each community. Network of positive correlations between lipids and metabolites (FDR < 1e-07, Spearman’s ρ > 0.38), colored based on the three identified communities, c1 (blue), c2 (green) and c3 (red). Communities are connected with associated clinical variables (FDR < 0.12) and ontology terms (FDR < 0.05). Black circled lipids and metabolites correspond to identified key lipids and key metabolites ( ). (B) Global network illustrating up and down-regulated lipids in PLWH with HIV. (C) Local network of community c1 highlighting key biomolecules. Biomolecular correlations within community c1 (FDR < 1e-07, Spearman’s ρ > 0.38). Black circled and named biomolecules correspond to the identified key lipids and metabolites within c1.