| Literature DB >> 35095486 |
Yang Ye1,2,3,4,5,6, Quan Li2,3,4,5,6, Chun-Shui Pan2,3,4,5,6, Li Yan2,3,4,5,6, Kai Sun2,3,4,5,6, Xiao-Yi Wang1,2,3,4,5,6, Shu-Qi Yao1,2,3,4,5,6, Jing-Yu Fan2,3,4,5,6, Jing-Yan Han1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
Background: Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) remains the only approved drug therapy for acute ischemic stroke. However, delayed tPA treatment is associated with an increased risk of brain hemorrhage. In this study, we assessed whether QiShenYiQi (QSYQ), a compound Chinese medicine, can attenuate tPA-induced brain edema and hemorrhage in an experimental stroke model.Entities:
Keywords: QiShenYiQi; blood-brain barrier; hemorrhage; ischemic stroke; tissue plasminogen activator
Year: 2022 PMID: 35095486 PMCID: PMC8790519 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.759027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Effect of QSYQ on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and infarction in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A) Schematic representation of experimental design. (B) Representative images and (C) quantitative analysis of CBF at baseline, 2.5, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 28.5 h after stroke onset (n = six to seven per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (D) Representative images and (E) quantitative analysis of infarct volume (n = 8 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. CBF indicates cerebral blood flow; MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; BBB, blood-brain barrier; IHC, immunohistochemistry; WB, western blot. *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA.
FIGURE 2Effect of QSYQ on animal survival and neurological dysfunction in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A) Survival rate (n = 12 per group). Data were compared by a Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Neurological deficits were assessed by (B) modified neurological severity score (mNSS) and (C) neurological evaluation scale (NES) (n = 8 per group). Data were compared by a Kruskal–Wallis test. *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA. ns, not statistically significant compared to thrombus + tPA.
FIGURE 3Effect of QSYQ on blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A) Representative images and (B) quantitative analysis of Evans blue extravasation (n = 7 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (C) Representative images and (D) quantitative analysis of albumin leakage (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (E) Quantitative analysis of cerabral water content (n = seven to eight per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA.
FIGURE 4Effect of QSYQ on brain hemorrhage and basement membrane protein expression in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A) Representative slices and (B) quantitative analysis of brain hemorrhage in each group (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (C) Representative images and (D,E) quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence staining for collagen IV and laminin in indicated groups (n = 3 per group). (F) Representative images and (G,H) quantitative analysis of immunoblotting of collagen IV and laminin in mouse brain tissues (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA.
FIGURE 5Effect of QSYQ on tight junctions and adherens junctions protein expression in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A,B) Representative images and (C,D) quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence staining for occludin and VE-cadherin in indicated groups (n = 3 per group). (E) Representative images of immunoblotting of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), junctional adhesion molecule-1 (JAM-1), occludin, claudin-5, VE-cadherin, α-catenin, and β-catenin in mouse brain tissues. Quantitative analysis of immunoblotting of ZO-1 (F), JAM-1 (G), occludin (H), claudin-5 (I), VE-cadherin (J), α-catenin (K), and β-catenin (L) (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA.
FIGURE 6Effect of QSYQ on caveolae-related protein expression, energy-related protein expression, and mitochondrial complex enzyme activity in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A) Representative images and (B,C) quantitative analysis of immunoblotting of Caveolin-1, Src, and phospho-Src in mouse brain tissues (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (D) Representative images and (E,F) quantitative analysis of immunoblotting of ATP 5D and ATP synthase α in mouse brain tissues (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (G-I) Enzyme activities of mitochondrial Complex I, II, and IV (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA.
FIGURE 7Effect of QSYQ on matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A) Representative images and (B,C) quantitative analysis of immunostaining results of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in indicated groups (n = 3 per group). (D) Representative slices and (E,F) quantitative analysis of immunoblotting of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in indicated groups (n = 6 per group). (G) Representative images and (H) quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence staining for aquaporin-4 (AQP4) (n = 3 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA.
FIGURE 8Effect of QSYQ on leukocyte adhesion and leukocyte infiltration in tPA-treated stroke mice. (A) Representative images and (B) quantitative analysis of leukocyte adhesion (n = 6 per group). Data were compared by a two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Red arrows indicate adherent leukocytes. (C) Representative images and (D) quantitative analysis of immunostaining for myeloperoxidase (MPO) (n = 3 per group). (E) Double immunofluorescence staining showing the colocalization of MMP-9 with leukocyte markers (MPO, CD18) and the specific macrophage marker (CD68), but not with endothelial cell marker (von Willebrand factor, vWF) in the thrombus + tPA group (n = 3 per group). *p < 0.05 vs sham; p < 0.05 vs thrombus; & p < 0.05 vs thrombus + tPA.