Literature DB >> 35095130

KEEPING SODA IN SNAP: Understanding the Other Iron Triangle.

Robert Paarlberg1, Dariush Mozaffarian2, Renata Micha2, Carolyn Chelius3.   

Abstract

Participants in SNAP have always been allowed to use their taxpayer-funded benefit to purchase Sugar Sweetened Beverages (SSBs). Despite an acute public health crisis surrounding the consumption of unhealthy products including SSBs, especially among the low-income citizens who also qualify for SNAP benefits, this policy has yet to be changed. Interviews with policy participants in Washington, D.C., reveal that change is being blocked by a culture of "personal responsibility" in America, plus three specific political forces: corporate lobbying primarily by the beverage and food retail industries; a desire by liberals to defend SNAP as income support for the poor even if nutrition outcomes are sub-optimal; and institutional inertia within the Department of Agriculture and the agricultural committees of Congress. In the 2018 farm bill debate, this "iron triangle" of bipartisan resistance to change was strong enough to block even a pilot study of SSB restrictions in SNAP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beverages; Congress; Farm bill; Health; Nutrition; SNAP; Sugar; USDA

Year:  2018        PMID: 35095130      PMCID: PMC8797053          DOI: 10.1007/s12115-018-0260-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Society        ISSN: 0147-2011


  10 in total

1.  Shifts in patterns and consumption of beverages between 1965 and 2002.

Authors:  Kiyah J Duffey; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  A Proposal for Improvements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Authors:  Susan M Levin; Neal D Barnard; Rose E Saltalamacchia
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  The Story of the Human Body: Evolution, Health and Disease.

Authors:  Daniel E Lieberman
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.

Authors:  Tatiana Andreyeva; Joerg Luedicke; Kathryn E Henderson; Amanda S Tripp
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis.

Authors:  D S Ludwig; K E Peterson; S L Gortmaker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-02-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Analysis of Program Administration and Food Law Definitions.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pomeranz; Jamie F Chriqui
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.

Authors:  Renata Micha; Jose L Peñalvo; Frederick Cudhea; Fumiaki Imamura; Colin D Rehm; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Public support for policies to improve the nutritional impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Authors:  Michael W Long; Cindy W Leung; Lilian W Y Cheung; Susan J Blumenthal; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives and disincentives for improving food purchases and health through the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): A microsimulation study.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Junxiu Liu; Stephen Sy; Yue Huang; Colin Rehm; Yujin Lee; Parke Wilde; Shafika Abrahams-Gessel; Thiago de Souza Veiga Jardim; Tom Gaziano; Renata Micha
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.