Literature DB >> 35094656

Duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity in hemodialysis patients.

Jun Matsumoto1, Yosuke Saka2, Tetsushi Mimura2, Tomohiko Naruse2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35094656      PMCID: PMC8812731          DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.2013887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is an emerging infectious disease that was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Older patients with underlying illnesses, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease, tend to become severely ill [1]. Most hemodialysis patients have multiple underlying diseases and complications; therefore, SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients has a case fatality rate approaching 20% [2]. Hemodialysis patients also have a very high risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with the general population [3] because they visit a hemodialysis center several times a week and are in close contact with other patients and caregivers. Therefore, hemodialysis patients are extremely vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, knowledge of their immune response after infection is limited. In this study, we investigated the duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity in hemodialysis patients with COVID-19. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 238 consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at Kasugai Municipal Hospital between 1 February 2020 and 30 June 2021. COVID-19 was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen test result. We quantitatively measured the levels of SARS-CoV-2 antigen using the Lumipulse® Presto SARS-CoV-2 Ag (Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) assay, performed using a fully automated Lumipulse® L2400 system (Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Patients who were discharged without confirmation of a negative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test result during hospitalization were excluded. Patients were divided into a hemodialysis (HD) group and a non-hemodialysis (non-HD) group. Data on their clinical characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory test results, and treatment type were obtained from their medical records and the clinical characteristics and duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity in the HD and non-HD groups were compared. The results were summarized as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) or as frequencies and percentages. We performed analysis of covariance to evaluate the duration of antigen positivity after adjustment for parameters with significant differences between the two groups. SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), was used for all statistical analyses. Two-sided p-values <.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The study was approved by Kasugai Municipal Hospital Committee on Human Research (approval number: 445). The requirement for consent was waived because the study was based on a retrospective review of medical records. A total of 127 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 16 were HD patients and 111 were non-HD patients. Patient baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age in the HD and non-HD groups was 69.5 years (IQR: 64.8–77.0 years) and 73.0 years (IQR: 58.0–81.0 years), respectively. The proportion of males was 69% and 67%, respectively.
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and laboratory findings of patients with COVID-19.

CharacteristicsHD (n = 16)non-HD (n = 111)p value
Age (yr), median (IQR)69.5 (64.8−77.0)73.0 (58.0−81.0).733
Male, n (%)11 (69)74 (67)1
Body mass index (kg/m2) > 35, n (%)3 (19)7 (6).114
Current smoker, n (%)0 (0)12 (11).36
Primary cause of ESKD, n (%)   
  Diabetic nephropathy9 (56)NA 
  Hypertension kidney disease3 (19)NA 
  Glomerulonephritis3 (19)NA 
  Others1 (6)NA 
Coexisting disorder, n (%)   
  Cardiovascular disease8 (50)28 (25).071
  Diabetes mellitus10 (63)24 (22).001
  Hypertension13 (81)47 (42).006
Previous medication, n (%)   
  ACEi/ARB6 (38)29 (26).375
Presenting symptoms, n (%)   
  Fever12 (75)93 (84).477
  Cough13 (81)30 (27)<.001
Laboratory findings   
 Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L), median (IQR)253 (221−339)293 (205−426).271
  Albumin (mg/dL), median (IQR)3.2 (2.8−3.5)3.3 (3.0−3.8).143
  eGFR (ml/min/1.73m2), median (IQR)NA65.4 (47.9−83.6) 
  C-reactive protein (mg/dL), median (IQR)7.6 (1.1−9.7)6.0 (1.8−12.0).916
Treatment, n (%)   
  Remdesivir3 (19)28 (25).759
  Dexamethasone10 (63)59 (53).595
Outcome   
  Mechanical ventilation, n (%)2 (13)13 (12)1
  Duration of hospitalization (day), median (IQR)40.0 (24.3−62.0)19.0 (8.0−34.0).003
  Death, n (%)2 (13)12 (11).69

IQR: interquartile range; ESKD: end-stage of kidney disease; ACEi: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin-1 receptor blocker.

Baseline characteristics and laboratory findings of patients with COVID-19. IQR: interquartile range; ESKD: end-stage of kidney disease; ACEi: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin-1 receptor blocker. The most common primary cause of end-stage kidney disease in the HD group was diabetic nephropathy (56%). Many patients in the HD group had underlying comorbidities with hypertension (81%), diabetes (63%), and cardiovascular disease (50%) being the most common. Fever was a common symptom in the HD group and the non-HD group (75% and 84%; p = .477); however, cough was more frequent in the HD group than in the non-HD group (81% vs 27%; p < .001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, and C-reactive protein levels, or the type of treatment provided. The duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the HD group than non-HD group (p = 0.003), but there were no significant differences between them in the proportions of mechanical ventilation and death. The duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity was significantly longer in the HD group (median: 20.0 days, IQR: 17.3– 24.8 days) than in the non-HD group (median: 16.0 days, IQR: 11.0 − 21.5 days; p = .022) (Figure 1). In the analysis of covariance, the duration of the positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen test result remained significantly longer in patients on hemodialysis (p = 0.036) after adjustment for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cough, which were parameters with significant differences between the two groups.
Figure 1.

Duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity in hemodialysis patients and non-hemodialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity was significantly longer in the HD group than the non-HD group (20 days vs 16 days; p = .022). After adjustment for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cough, which were the parameters which differed significantly between the groups, the duration of positive SARS-CoV-2 on antigen test remained longer in patients on hemodialysis (p = .036). HD: hemodialysis. *Statistically analysis after adjustment

Duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity in hemodialysis patients and non-hemodialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity was significantly longer in the HD group than the non-HD group (20 days vs 16 days; p = .022). After adjustment for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cough, which were the parameters which differed significantly between the groups, the duration of positive SARS-CoV-2 on antigen test remained longer in patients on hemodialysis (p = .036). HD: hemodialysis. *Statistically analysis after adjustment To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the duration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen positivity in hemodialysis patients. The clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, and treatment type of the HD and non-HD groups were similar, yet the duration of antigen positivity was significantly longer in the HD group than in the non-HD group. Hemodialysis patients have been reported to respond later than healthy age-matched individuals following vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine [4]. In the case of natural infection, hemodialysis patients do not demonstrate effective clearance of the virus, thus persistence of viral antigens leading to continuous stimulation of immune response with antibody production. The seroconversion rates in hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 have been reported to increase with time [5], but as hemodialysis patients have a deficient immune response [6,7], they may remain SARS-CoV-2 antigen test positive for longer than other patients. Hemodialysis patients are at a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection because of their weakened immunocompetence, need for daily hospital visits, and the possibility of close contact with patients in the dialysis unit [8], which requires significant efforts to expand infection prevention. Currently, SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing is not commonly performed when COVID-19 patients are released from isolation. Considering that the duration of antigen positivity is longer in hemodialysis patients, we suggest that antigen tests be performed in hemodialysis patients before they are released from isolation.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Disturbances of acquired immunity in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Theodoros Eleftheriadis; Georgia Antoniadi; Vassilios Liakopoulos; Charalambos Kartsios; Ioannis Stefanidis
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Molecular aspects of T- and B-cell function in uremia.

Authors:  M Girndt; M Sester; U Sester; H Kaul; H Köhler
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.545

3.  Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yang; Yuan Yu; Jiqian Xu; Huaqing Shu; Jia'an Xia; Hong Liu; Yongran Wu; Lu Zhang; Zhui Yu; Minghao Fang; Ting Yu; Yaxin Wang; Shangwen Pan; Xiaojing Zou; Shiying Yuan; You Shang
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 30.700

4.  Persistence of antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of haemodialysis patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Suzanne Forbes; Maria Davari; Sahana Gnanasampanthan; Noam Roth; Gregor Young; Ravindra Rajakariar; Andrea Cove-Smith; Muhammed Magdi Yaqoob; Teresa Cutino-Moguel; Viyaasan Mahalingasivam; Kieran McCafferty
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Antibody response to the BNT162b2 vaccine in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Philippe Attias; Hamza Sakhi; Philippe Rieu; Arvish Soorkia; David Assayag; Sabrina Bouhroum; Patrice Nizard; Khalil El Karoui
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Risk factors for mortality in hemodialysis patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fengping Wang; Guangyu Ao; Yushu Wang; Fuqiang Liu; Mulong Bao; Ming Gao; Shulu Zhou; Xin Qi
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.606

7.  Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcome of COVID-19 in Adults on Kidney Replacement Therapy: A Regionwide Registry Study.

Authors:  Johan De Meester; Dirk De Bacquer; Maarten Naesens; Bjorn Meijers; Marie M Couttenye; An S De Vriese
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Minimizing the risk of COVID-19 among patients on dialysis.

Authors:  T Alp Ikizler; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 28.314

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.