Literature DB >> 33887317

Antibody response to the BNT162b2 vaccine in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Philippe Attias1, Hamza Sakhi2, Philippe Rieu1, Arvish Soorkia3, David Assayag3, Sabrina Bouhroum1, Patrice Nizard3, Khalil El Karoui4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33887317      PMCID: PMC8055946          DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


× No keyword cloud information.
To the editor: Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) may have altered vaccine responses. Although mRNA vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have demonstrated dramatic efficacy in preventing symptomatic forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the nondialysis population, the characterization of vaccine response in patients receiving MHD remains a major unmet need. We studied the humoral response after the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine using anti–spike(S)1 IgG antibody (Beckman Coulter Access; reference range for antibody positivity signal-to-cutoff >1; gray zone, 0.8–1) in a single-center cohort of 69 patients receiving MHD. Three hundred seventy-eight samples were analyzed (Figure 1 ). Thirteen patients (19%) had a history of previous COVID-19 or positive baseline serology. Samples until week 6 to 7 were available for 64 patients. Overall seropositivity rate at last follow-up was 55 of 64 (86%) (Supplementary Table S1). Patients aged >70 years were less likely to reach seropositivity at last follow-up (28 of 37 [75%]; P = 0.01; Supplementary Table S1). Conversely, immunocompromised status did not influence the seroconversion rate (7 of 8 [87%] seropositive among immunocompromised patients). The rate of early seropositivity was associated with a history of COVID-19 (Supplementary Table S2). Since week 2, the mean anti-S1 levels of these patients were significantly higher than those of infection-naïve individuals, even after both injections (Supplementary Table S3; Figure 1a). No difference in patient characteristics was observed between both groups (Supplementary Table S3). Among infection-naïve patients, anti–S1 IgG levels progressively increased among time (Figure 1b). The seropositivity rate was 10 of 56 (18%) before the second injection and 43 of 52 (82%) at last follow-up (Supplementary Tables S3–S5). Older age was associated with a reduced late seropositivity rate (Supplementary Table S5). Interestingly, 2 infection-naïve patients developed paucisymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection 5 and 6 weeks after first vaccine dose. Anti-S1 titers were 0.5 and 1.4, respectively, in these patients.
Figure 1

Serologic response after first and second injections of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with or without history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). (a) Comparison of the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti–spike antibodies over time (days) after the first (day 0; blue arrow) and second (day 28; red arrow) BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine between a group with previous COVID-19 (n = 13) and a group with no history of COVID-19 (n = 57). Scatterplot with bar is shown. Means ± SEM are shown. The cutoff for negative serology was defined according to the manufacturer (index signal-to-cutoff [S/CO] <1; dashed line). (b). Kinetics of the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 anti–spike antibodies over time (days) with repeated measures matched for each patient, after the first (day 0; blue arrow) and second (day 28; red arrow) BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine between a group with previous COVID-19 (n = 13) and a group with no history of COVID-19 (n = 57). Spaghetti plot is shown. The cutoff for negative serology was defined according to the manufacturer (index S/CO <1; dashed line). Statistical analysis with mixed-effect analysis with Sidak multiple-comparison test. ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. NS, nonsignificant.

Serologic response after first and second injections of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with or without history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). (a) Comparison of the evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti–spike antibodies over time (days) after the first (day 0; blue arrow) and second (day 28; red arrow) BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine between a group with previous COVID-19 (n = 13) and a group with no history of COVID-19 (n = 57). Scatterplot with bar is shown. Means ± SEM are shown. The cutoff for negative serology was defined according to the manufacturer (index signal-to-cutoff [S/CO] <1; dashed line). (b). Kinetics of the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 anti–spike antibodies over time (days) with repeated measures matched for each patient, after the first (day 0; blue arrow) and second (day 28; red arrow) BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine between a group with previous COVID-19 (n = 13) and a group with no history of COVID-19 (n = 57). Spaghetti plot is shown. The cutoff for negative serology was defined according to the manufacturer (index S/CO <1; dashed line). Statistical analysis with mixed-effect analysis with Sidak multiple-comparison test. ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. NS, nonsignificant. In this analysis of postvaccine humoral response, patients receiving MHD have an overall anti-S1 seropositivity rate >80% after 2 doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, but only 18% after a single injection. Moreover, patients receiving MHD with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection have a higher rate of positive anti–S1 IgG (as expected) and higher anti–S1 IgG levels, compared with infection-naïve individuals. Older age is associated with a lower seropositivity rate in our cohort. These data are probably close to those observed in patients not receiving dialysis (as for long-term humoral response post–COVID-19), although seropositivity rates appear to be lower in patients receiving MHD. Although anti–S1 IgG titer is reported to correlate with in vitro virus neutralization, postvaccine immunity longevity (including cellular immunity not studied in this work) and protection from symptomatic infection remain to be studied in patients receiving MHD. Overall, this study suggests that most patients receiving MHD given both doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine are expected to develop an anti–S1 IgG response that may be protective.
  38 in total

1.  Impaired Humoral but Substantial Cellular Immune Response to Variants of Concern B1.1.7 and B.1.351 in Hemodialysis Patients after Vaccination with BNT162b2.

Authors:  Constantin J Thieme; Arturo Blazquez-Navarro; Lema Safi; Sviatlana Kaliszczyk; Krystallenia Paniskaki; Isabel E Neumann; Kita Schmidt; Mara Stockhausen; Jan Hörstrup; Ocan Cinkilic; Linus Flitsch-Kiefner; Toni L Meister; Corinna Marheinecke; Stephanie Pfaender; Eike Steinmann; Felix S Seibert; Ulrik Stervbo; Timm H Westhoff; Toralf Roch; Nina Babel
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Humoral Response to BNT1622 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Patients with Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Delphine Kervella; Pierre Braud; Claire Garandeau; Celine Phelizot; Xavier Ambrosi; Gilles Blancho; Maryvonne Hourmant; Lucile Figueres
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Spike and neutralizing antibodies response to COVID-19 vaccination in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Matthieu Giot; Toscane Fourié; Guillaume Lano; Paola Mariela Saba Villarroel; Xavier de Lamballeri; Marion Gully; Laurent Samson; Julien Farault; Dammar Bouchouareb; Océane Jehel; Philippe Brunet; Noémie Jourde-Chiche; Laetitia Ninove; Thomas Robert
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-07-06

4.  Antibody Response to COVID-19 vaccination in Patients Receiving Dialysis.

Authors:  Shuchi Anand; Maria E Montez-Rath; Jialin Han; Pablo Garcia; LinaCel Cadden; Patti Hunsader; Russell Kerschmann; Paul Beyer; Mary Dittrich; Geoffrey A Block; Scott D Boyd; Julie Parsonnet; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-05-12

5.  Predictors and Dynamics of the Humoral and Cellular Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Jens Van Praet; Marijke Reynders; Dirk De Bacquer; Liesbeth Viaene; Melanie K Schoutteten; Rogier Caluwé; Peter Doubel; Line Heylen; Annelies V De Bel; Bruno Van Vlem; Deborah Steensels; An S De Vriese
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Antibody Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients Receiving Dialysis.

Authors:  Shuchi Anand; Maria E Montez-Rath; Jialin Han; Pablo Garcia; LinaCel Cadden; Patti Hunsader; Russell Kerschmann; Paul Beyer; Mary Dittrich; Geoffrey A Block; Scott D Boyd; Julie Parsonnet; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 14.978

7.  The DiaCoVAb Study in South Italy: Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Dialysis Patients.

Authors:  Alessandra Fucci; Simona Giacobbe; Ilaria Guerriero; Yoko Suzumoto; Egildo Luca D'Andrea; Marianna Scrima; Maria Luisa Nolli; Anna Iervolino; Luigi Amedeo Chiuchiolo; Ermanno Salvatore; Roberta Renzulli; Ludovico La Peccerella; Giuseppe Marra; Marco Liuzzi; Domenico Santoro; Enrico Zulli; Romolo Gentile; Gennaro Clemente; Giovambattista Capasso
Journal:  Kidney Blood Press Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.096

8.  Review of Early Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Among Patients With CKD.

Authors:  Edward J Carr; Andreas Kronbichler; Matthew Graham-Brown; Graham Abra; Christos Argyropoulos; Lorraine Harper; Edgar V Lerma; Rita S Suri; Joel Topf; Michelle Willicombe; Swapnil Hiremath
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  The Safety and Immunogenicity of the mRNA-BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Emanuel Zitt; Tamara Davidovic; Judith Schimpf; Armin Abbassi-Nik; Beatrix Mutschlechner; Hanno Ulmer; Magdalena A Benda; Hannelore Sprenger-Mähr; Thomas Winder; Karl Lhotta
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Humoral and Cellular Responses to mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Administered to Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  José Jesús Broseta; Diana Rodríguez-Espinosa; Néstor Rodríguez; María Del Mar Mosquera; María Ángeles Marcos; Natalia Egri; Mariona Pascal; Erica Soruco; José Luis Bedini; Beatriu Bayés; Francisco Maduell
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 8.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.