| Literature DB >> 35093096 |
Md Sajid Hussain1,2, Atul Vashist3,4, Mahadevan Kumar5,6, Neetu Kumra Taneja5,7, Uma Shankar Gautam5,8, Seema Dwivedi1, Jaya Sivaswami Tyagi5, Rajesh Kumar Gupta9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis currently stands as the second leading cause of deaths worldwide due to single infectious agent after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The current challenges of drug resistance in tuberculosis highlight an urgent need to develop newer anti-mycobacterial compounds. In the present study, we report the serendipitous discovery of a bacterial laboratory contaminant (LC-1) exhibiting a zone of growth inhibition on an agar plate seeded with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35093096 PMCID: PMC8799974 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-022-01743-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Antagonistic spectrum of LC-1 against various bacterial strains by spot bioassay. a M. tuberculosis H37Rv; b M. bovis BCG; c M. smegmatis; d E. coli; e S. aureus
Morphological and physiological properties of LC-1
| Test | Result | Test | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration | Round | 37 °C | + |
| Margin | Entire | 42 °C | + |
| Elevation | Raised | 55 °C | − |
| Surface | Smooth | ||
| Pigment | White | ||
| Opacity | Opaque | 5 | + |
| Gram's reaction | + | 6 | + |
| Cell shape | Cocci | 7 | + |
| Size (µm) | 1.2–1.4 µm | 8 | + |
| Spore(s) | − | 9 | + |
| Motility | − | 10.5 | + |
| 4 °C | − | 2 | + |
| 15 °C | + | 4 | + |
| 20 °C | + | 6 | + |
| 30 °C | + | 10 | + |
Biochemical properties of LC-1
| Test | Results | Test | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth on MacConkey agar | − | Tween 20 hydrolysis | + |
| Indole test | − | Tween 40 hydrolysis | − |
| Methyl red test | − | Tween 80 hydrolysis | − |
| Voges Kauer test | − | Arginine dihydrolase | − |
| Citrate utilization | − | ||
| H2S production | − | ||
| Gas production | − | Glucose | + |
| Casein hydrolysis | − | Lactose | + |
| Esculin hydrolysis | − | Sucrose | + |
| Gelatin hydrolysis | − | Arabinose | − |
| Starch hydrolysis | − | Salicin | − |
| Urea hydrolysis | − | Mannose | − |
| Nitrate reduction | + | Mannitol | − |
| Catalase test | + | Xylose | − |
| Oxidase test | − | Glycerol | + |
Fig. 2Anti-mycobacterial activity of culture filtrate (CF) and its molecular weight cut-off fractions against M. bovis BCG. a CF from culture grown in Glycerol enriched medium (G+) and without glycerol (G−), MG+ & MG− represent respective media controls; b 30 kDa retentates of G+ (30RG+) and G− (30RG−); c 10 kDa retentates of 30FG+ (10RG+) and 30FG− (10RG−). 30FG+ and 30FG− are 30 kDa filtrates of G+ and G− respectively
Fig. 3Purification and characterization of 30RG−. a Gel filtration profile of 30RG− using Sephacryl S-100 column; b anti-mycobacterial activity of 30RG−, F-1 (Fraction-1), F-1S (F-1 Shoulder fraction) and F-2 (Fraction-2)
Fig. 4Effect of different physical and chemical treatments on anti-mycobacterial property of F-1. a Proteolytic enzymes treatment—C: untreated F-1 (control); 1: treated with α-chymotrypsin; 2: treated with Proteinase K; b heat treatment—C: untreated F-1 (control); 1: treated for 30 min; 2: treated for 60 min; c pH treatment—1: treated with buffer of pH 3.0; 2: treated with buffer of pH 4.5; 3: treated with buffer of pH 6.0; 4: treated with buffer of pH 7.5; 5: treated with buffer of pH 9.0; 6: treated with buffer of pH 10.5; C: untreated F-1 (control)
Fig. 5Antimicrobial activity of F-1 against different bacteria. a E. coli; b S. aureus; c M. smegmatis; d M. bovis BCG. MC: media control; F-1: Fraction-1; G−: culture filtrate without Glycerol
Fig. 6SDS-PAGE analysis of 30RG− and its various cut-off fractions. Lane 1: molecular weight Marker; lane 2: 30RG−; lane 3: Fraction-1 (F-1); lane 4: F-1 shoulder fraction (F-1S)
Details of protein (~ 35 kDa) of F-1 fraction identified through MALDI-TOF MS/MS analysis
| S. no. | Protein reference | Protein name | Source organism | Molecular weight (kDa) | Mascot score | Matched sequence | Cellular localization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | gi|22846002 | SphX | 34.934 | 964 | 29 | Cytoplasmic membrane | |
| 2 | gi|70726523 | Thioredoxin reductase | 35.097 | 290 | 9 | Cytosol/mitocondria | |
| 3 | gi|15923133 | Alkylphosphonate ABC transporter | 35.038 | 69 | 3 | Cytoplasmic membrane | |
| 4 | gi|70725319 | Hypothetical protein SH0318 | 35.104 | 69 | 3 | Periplasm | |
| 5 | gi|228469577 | Conserved hypothetical protein | 64.548 | 56 | 3 | Unknown | |
| 6 | gi|189183631 | Hypothetical protein OTT_0724 | 44.775 | 56 | 3 | Unknown |
Detail of top 10 proteins in F-1 shoulder fraction (F-1S) identified through MALDI-TOF MS/MS analysis
| S. no. | Protein reference | Protein name | Source organism | Molecular weight (kDa) | Mascot score | Matched sequence | Cellularlocalization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | gi|22847567 | Lipase | 62.029 | 444 | 7 | Cytoplasmic membrane | |
| 2 | gi|228474296 | Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase | 49.716 | 431 | 6 | Cytosol/mitocondria | |
| 3 | gi|228474409 | Phosphopyruvate hydratase | 47.154 | 413 | 9 | Cytoplasm | |
| 4 | gi|228476002 | SphX | 34.934 | 384 | 7 | Cytoplasmic membrane | |
| 5 | gi|228475766 | Alkaline phosphatase 3 | 53.395 | 381 | 7 | Cytoplasmic membrane | |
| 6 | gi|15924086 | Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase | 49.421 | 347 | 4 | Cytosol/mitocondria | |
| 7 | gi|228474919 | Purine nucleoside phosphorylase | 25.905 | 320 | 5 | Cytosol | |
| 8 | gi|228476046 | DNA binding protein HU 1 | 9.650 | 283 | 5 | Cytoplasmic membrane | |
| 9 | gi|70725402 | Alkaline phosphatase III precursor | S | 53.385 | 244 | 6 | Cytoplasmic membrane |
| 10 | gi|224475921 | 2-Phospho- | 47.240 | 240 | 3 | Cytosol/cytoplasmic membrane |
Bacterial strains used in this study
| Bacterial strain | Culture medium and temperature | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Lab contamination strain (LC-1) | NB at 37 °C | A |
| 7H9 at 37 °C | B | |
| 7H9 at 37 °C | C | |
| 7H9 at 37 °C | D | |
| LB at 37 °C | E | |
| LB at 37 °C | F |
NB: nutrient broth; 7H9: 7H9 broth supplemented with 0.2% glycerol, 0.1% Tween 80 and 10% OADC/ADC; LB: Luria Bertani broth; A: Department of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; B: Kind gift from Dr. Richard F. Silver, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; C: Kind gift from Dr. Calvin Boon, Mycobacterium Biology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell biology, Singapore; D: Kind gift from Dr. D. Chatterji, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India; E: Invitrogen Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA; F: Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Fig. 7Flow chart outlining production and partial purification of anti-mycobacterial/s from LC-1. LC-1: lab contaminating strain; NB: nutrient broth; F-1: Fraction-1; F-1S: F-1 Shoulder fraction; F-2: Fraction-2