| Literature DB >> 35090431 |
Jianwei Wang1, Zhengqing Bao2, Xiao Xu2, Zhenhua Liu2, Guizhong Li2, Guanglin Huang2, Libo Man2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal acute management of patients with blunt straddle injury to the bulbar urethra remains in question. Conventionally, suprapubic diversion with delayed urethroplasty can always be considered, if necessary, but the role of early endoscopic realignment (EER) in the acute management of blunt straddle injuries to bulbar urethra is controversial. We report our clinical experience and outcomes with EER for patients with straddle injury to the bulbar urethra in a level one trauma center.Entities:
Keywords: Crush injuries; Minimally invasive surgery; Urethra; Urethral obstruction; Wounds and injuries
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35090431 PMCID: PMC8800257 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01489-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.102
Fig. 1Staging of the injury with findings of urethrocystoscopy. A Partial rupture; B Complete rupture. White arrows show the margins of the broken urethal mucosa
Patient characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Partial rupture | Complete rupture | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 44 | 14 (31.8) | 30 (68.2) | ||
| Age, mean and range, y | 39.7±16.1 (16–71) | 38.2±17.0 (20–71) | 40.4±15.9 (16–70) | 0.676 | |
| Injury mechanism, n (%) | |||||
| Fall | 27 (61.4) | 8 | 19 | ||
| Motorcycle accident | 11 (25.0) | 4 | 7 | ||
| Bicycle accident | 6 (13.6) | 2 | 4 | 0.918 | |
| Concomitant injures, n (%) | |||||
| Scrotal hematoma | 9 (20.0) | 2 | 7 | ||
| Perineal hematoma | 10 (22.7) | 3 | 7 | 1.000 | 0.667 (0.084–5.301) |
Surgical outcomes
| Parameters | Total | Partial rupture | Complete rupture | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time from injury to EER, mean and range, h | 11.4±9.0 (2–48) | 8.1±3.7 (2–14) | 13.0±10.3 (4–48) | 0.092 | |
| Lesion location to bulbar urethra, n (%) | |||||
| Distal or middle | 19 (43.2) | 8 | 11 | ||
| Proximal | 25 (56.8) | 6 | 19 | 1.000 | 1.091 (0.275-4.324) |
| Membranous urethral involved | 5 (11.4) | 0 | 5 | ||
| Operation time, mean and range, min | 33.9±10.8 (10–60) | 28.2±9.5 (10–40) | 36.5±10.4 (20–60) | 0.016 | |
| Perioperative complication, n (%) | |||||
| Periurethral abscess | 1 (2.3) | 0 | 1 | ||
| Epididymitis | 2 (4.5) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bleeding | 7 (15.9) | 1 | 6 | ||
| Surgical outcome, n (%) | |||||
| Successful EER attempt | 31 (70.5) | 13 (92.9) | 18 (60.0) | ||
| Failed EER attempt | 13 (29.5) | 1 | 12 | 0.035 | 8.667 (0.998–75.235) |
| Outcomes of Patients with successful EER attempt, n (%) | |||||
| Successful | 7/31 (22.6) | 5 | 2 | ||
| Failed | 24/31 (77.4) | 8 | 16 | 0.099 | 0.200 (0.032–1.267) |
| Follow-up, median and range, mo | 37.5 (12–78) | 32.5 (12-63) | 38.0 (12–78) | 0.000 | |
| Time to spontaneous voiding, mean and range, mo | 4.2±3.1 (1–12) | 4.0±2.9 (1–11) | 4.3±3.3 (1–12) | 0.795 | |
| Stricture length, mean and range, n (%) | |||||
| Failed EER | 2.2±0.6 (1.0–3.0) | ||||
| Occurred after successful EER | 1.8±0.8 (0.5–3.0 | 0.103 | |||
Fig. 2Perineal abscess developed after EER. The yellow arrow indicates the perineal abscess and the necrotic tissue around it