PURPOSE: The authors of this guideline reviewed the urologic trauma literature to guide clinicians in the appropriate methods of evaluation and management of genitourinary injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE® and EMBASE databases (search dates 1/1/90-9/19/12) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to urotrauma. The review yielded an evidence base of 372 studies after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to inform the statements presented in the guideline as Standards, Recommendations or Options. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence for a particular treatment was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate) or C (low). In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions. RESULTS: Guideline statements were created to inform clinicians on the initial observation, evaluation and subsequent management of renal, ureteral, bladder, urethral and genital traumatic injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Genitourinary organ salvage has become increasingly possible as a result of advances in imaging, minimally invasive techniques, and reconstructive surgery. As the field of genitourinary reconstruction continues to evolve, clinicians must strive to approach clinical problems in a creative, multidisciplinary, evidence-based manner to ensure optimal outcomes.
PURPOSE: The authors of this guideline reviewed the urologic trauma literature to guide clinicians in the appropriate methods of evaluation and management of genitourinary injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE® and EMBASE databases (search dates 1/1/90-9/19/12) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to urotrauma. The review yielded an evidence base of 372 studies after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to inform the statements presented in the guideline as Standards, Recommendations or Options. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence for a particular treatment was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate) or C (low). In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions. RESULTS: Guideline statements were created to inform clinicians on the initial observation, evaluation and subsequent management of renal, ureteral, bladder, urethral and genital traumatic injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Genitourinary organ salvage has become increasingly possible as a result of advances in imaging, minimally invasive techniques, and reconstructive surgery. As the field of genitourinary reconstruction continues to evolve, clinicians must strive to approach clinical problems in a creative, multidisciplinary, evidence-based manner to ensure optimal outcomes.
Authors: Suryanarayana M Siram; Sonja Z Gerald; Wendy R Greene; Kakra Hughes; Tolulope A Oyetunji; Kristin Chrouser; Edward E Cornwell; David C Chang Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Gustavo P Fraga; Gustavo M Borges; Mario Mantovani; Ubirajara Ferreira; Tiago L Laurito; Nelson R Netto Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Connor S McCormick; Mitchell G Dumais; Niels V Johnsen; Bryan B Voelzke; Judith C Hagedorn Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: David B Bayne; Anas Tresh; Nima Baradaran; Gregory Murphy; E Charles Osterberg; Shellee Ogawa; Jessica Wenzel; Lindsay Hampson; Jack McAninch; Benjamin Breyer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.226