Literature DB >> 35089500

Does type of robotic platform make a difference in the final cost of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy?

Marcio Covas Moschovas1,2, Talia Helman3, Seetharam Bhat4, Marco Sandri5, Travis Rogers4, Jonathan Noel4, Sunil Reddy4, Cathy Corder4, Vipul Patel4,6.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the difference of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) costs in patients with similar preoperative characteristics operated on using the da Vinci® SP and Xi robotic platforms. We performed a retrospective analysis on 71 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent RARP with the SP robot between June 2019 and April 2020. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed and 71 patients were selected from a cohort of 875 who underwent RARP with the Xi robot in the same period. We divided the total expense per surgery into the cost of disposable materials, robotic instruments (initial purchasing cost divided by the number of "lives"), and operative room costs. Only variable costs are included in this study, as fixed costs do not vary between procedures and are the same for both cohorts. Fixed costs include anesthesia, pathology, surgeon, and hospitalization fees. The median total cost for SP-RARP was $5586 ($5360-$5982) USD and $4875 ($4661-$5093) USD with the XI for a median cost difference of $707 ($584-$832) (P < 0.001). The median cost of disposables for the SP was $1877 ($1588-$2193) USD and for the Xi $1527 ($1407-$1781) USD, P < 0.001. Non-disposable instruments cost per case (fixed cost) was $1610 and $1270 USD for the SP and Xi, respectively. The cost of radical prostatectomy in the SP cohort is higher than the Xi cohort. The greater price was primarily due to the increased cost of instruments and disposable materials. In our experience, the lack of GelPOINT and space maker is also crucial factors to decrease the SP total cost.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost analysis; Economics; Minimally invasive; Prostate cancer; Robotic surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35089500     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01359-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  25 in total

1.  Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery.

Authors:  Hua-yin Yu; Nathanael D Hevelone; Stuart R Lipsitz; Keith J Kowalczyk; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Contemporary National Assessment of Robot-Assisted Surgery Rates and Total Hospital Charges for Major Surgical Uro-Oncological Procedures in the United States.

Authors:  Elio Mazzone; Francesco A Mistretta; Sophie Knipper; Zhe Tian; Alessandro Larcher; Hugues Widmer; Kevin Zorn; Umberto Capitanio; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Seetharam Bhat; Fikret Onol; Travis Rogers; Vipul Patel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Applications of the da Vinci single port (SP) robotic platform in urology: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Seetharam Bhat; Travis Rogers; David Thiel; Fikret Onol; Shannon Roof; Maria C Sighinolfi; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul Patel
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-29

5.  A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-port and Multiport Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hari T Vigneswaran; Logan S Schwarzman; Simone Francavilla; Michael R Abern; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Cost of New Technologies in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy, and Proton Beam Therapy.

Authors:  Florian Rudolf Schroeck; Bruce L Jacobs; Sam B Bhayani; Paul L Nguyen; David Penson; Jim Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial.

Authors:  Annabelle Forsmark; Jacob Gehrman; Eva Angenete; Anders Bjartell; Ingela Björholt; Stefan Carlsson; Jonas Hugosson; Tom Marlow; Karin Stinesen-Kollberg; Johan Stranne; Anna Wallerstedt; Peter Wiklund; Ulrica Wilderäng; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Ivano Morra; Marco Lucci Chiarissi; Matteo Manfredi; Fabrizio Mele; Susanna Grande; Francesca Ragni; Massimiliano Poggio; Cristian Fiori
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Coughlin; John W Yaxley; Suzanne K Chambers; Stefano Occhipinti; Hema Samaratunga; Leah Zajdlewicz; Patrick Teloken; Nigel Dunglison; Scott Williams; Martin F Lavin; Robert A Gardiner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Technical Modifications Necessary to Implement the da Vinci Single-port Robotic System.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Seetharam Bhat; Travis Rogers; Fikret Onol; Shannon Roof; Elio Mazzone; Alexandre Mottrie; Vipul Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contemporary techniques of da Vinci SP radical prostatectomy: multicentric collaboration and expert opinion.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Isabella Brady; Jonathan Noel; Mahmoud Abou Zeinab; Aaron Kaviani; Jihad Kaouk; Simone Crivellaro; Jean Joseph; Alexandre Mottrie; Vipul Patel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Single-site multiport vs. conventional multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity score matching comparative study.

Authors:  Weibin Hou; Bingzhi Wang; Lei Zhou; Lan Li; Chao Li; Peng Yuan; Wei Ouyang; Hanyu Yao; Jin Huang; Kun Yao; Long Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.