Literature DB >> 32623822

Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience.

Marcio Covas Moschovas1, Seetharam Bhat1, Fikret Onol1, Travis Rogers1, Vipul Patel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the crucial factors related to the implementation of the da Vinci single-port (SP) system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), and the early outcomes after the introduction of this robot for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data from 50 consecutive patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent RARP using this robot. The median follow-up was 53 days. We performed a transperitoneal technique. The robotic (multiport) trocar was placed on the supra-umbilical midline 20 cm from the pubis and an assistant trocar placed in the right lower quadrant. We report our initial experience describing the intra- and postoperative outcomes associated with this new robot. Also, we report the early functional and oncological outcomes in the follow-up period considered. Continuous variables were described as medians and interquartile ranges, while categorical variables as frequencies and proportions.
RESULTS: The median total operative time was 118 min, median console time was 80 min, and median estimated blood loss was 50 mL. There were no intraoperative complications or blood transfusions. The final pathology reported 18% Grade Group (GrGp)1, 58% GrGp2, 18% GrGp3, 2% GrGp4, and 4% GrGp5. In all, 40 patients (80%) were pT2 and 20% were ≥pT3a. The overall positive surgical margin rate was 14%. In all, 39 patients (78%) achieved full continence at median of 21 days after RARP. The median pain scale (0-10) score at 8, 12 and 16 h after RARP was 2, 2, and 0, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The use of the da Vinci SP robot with an additional assistant port for RARP is technically safe and feasible, with acceptable short-term functional and oncological outcomes. However, there is a technical learning curve for this new platform due to the smaller scope of the operative field and the decreased flexibility and strength of the surgical instruments.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; da Vinci single port; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32623822     DOI: 10.1111/bju.15158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Does type of robotic platform make a difference in the final cost of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Talia Helman; Seetharam Bhat; Marco Sandri; Travis Rogers; Jonathan Noel; Sunil Reddy; Cathy Corder; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 2.  Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Vipul Patel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Initial experience of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon's experience with technique description.

Authors:  Tae Il Noh; Jong Hyun Tae; Ji Sung Shim; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon; Jeong Gu Lee; Sung Gu Kang
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 4.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Advancements in surgical technique and perioperative care.

Authors:  Isaac Palma-Zamora; Firas Abdollah; Craig Rogers; Wooju Jeong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.