Literature DB >> 35088620

Knowledge and Attitudes of Research Participants in China Toward Electronic Informed Consent in Clinical Trials: A Cross Sectional Study.

Zhanqing Hu1, Chenxi Ouyang2, Jessica Hahne3, Kaveh Khoshnood3, Jinqiang Zhang4, Xiyu Liu1,5, Ying Wu6, Xiaomin Wang1,5.   

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of participants and potential participants in clinical trials toward electronic informed consent. We conducted a survey-based cross-sectional study in Hunan Province, China in March 2021. A total of 547 respondents were included in this study. All questions in an 8-item survey section assessing participants' knowledge of electronic informed consent received correct answers from at least 70% of participants. In terms of attitude scores, most participants (86.3%) believed that electronic informed consent is more convenient than the paper-based version, and more than half (51.2%) believed that electronic informed consent could completely replace the paper-based version. Responses indicated that common concerns about electronic informed consent were its security and confidentiality, legal benefits, and implications for rights protection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitude; clinical trial; electronic consent; informed consent; knowledge

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35088620      PMCID: PMC9149068          DOI: 10.1177/15562646221075884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.978


  15 in total

1.  Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Babette Brumback; Janice L Krieger; Kenneth W Goodman; Arch G Mainous; Ray E Moseley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Perspectives on Electronic Informed Consent From Patients Underrepresented in Research in the United States: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Helen A Schartz; Gary E Rosenthal; Eric L Eisenstein; David W Klein
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Risk based survey evidence supports electronic informed consent as a recruitment method for UK clinical trials.

Authors:  Natasha Stevens; Lara Edwards; Zuhur Balayah; Richard Hooper; Charles Knowles
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Barriers to Change in the Informed Consent Process: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Zachary P Hallinan; Annemarie Forrest; Gina Uhlenbrauck; Sheila Young; Ross McKinney
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 May-Jun

5.  Paving the way to a more effective informed consent process: Recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.

Authors:  Jennifer Lentz; Michele Kennett; Jane Perlmutter; Annemarie Forrest
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Bob Wong; Nancy C Rose; Rebecca Anderson; Beth Fedor; Louisa A Stark; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Golembiewski; Arch G Mainous; Kiarash P Rahmanian; Babette Brumback; Benjamin J Rooks; Janice L Krieger; Kenneth W Goodman; Ray E Moseley; Christopher A Harle
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access.

Authors:  Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Nancy E Adler; Robert Nguyen; Andrea López; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evelien De Sutter; Drieda Zaçe; Stefania Boccia; Maria Luisa Di Pietro; David Geerts; Pascal Borry; Isabelle Huys
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  The Expanding Digital Divide: Digital Health Access Inequities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City.

Authors:  Chukwuma N Eruchalu; Margaret S Pichardo; Maheetha Bharadwaj; Carmen B Rodriguez; Jorge A Rodriguez; Regan W Bergmark; David W Bates; Gezzer Ortega
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.